EAST GREENVILLE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: BROWN PRINTING COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BROWN PRINTING COMPANY in ROUTE 29, EAST GREENVILLE, PA 18041 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102931318.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BROWN PRINTING COMPANY
- Site address
- ROUTE 29
- City
- EAST GREENVILLE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18041
- Mailing
- RR #2, BOX 2614, EAST GREENVILLE, PA 18041
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2752
- Employees
- 620
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $200 Reduced
8302
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform tasks involving repetitive motions resulting in stresses that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumula- tive trauma disorders: a) East Greenville Plant, Bindery Department - Employees (utility workers) performing such tasks as pocket filling, sorting/sacking and cover feeding. Evaluation of these tasks indicates that these employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1990 through 1992, documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements: 1. Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing cumulative trauma disorders in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee quest- ionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged. 2. Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of CTDs. The program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of CTD cases, and should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. 3. Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing CTDs, symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence of CTD. A supervisors' training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of the signs of CTDs and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. 4. Hazard prevention and control which includes enginering, work practice, and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment where relevant. a. Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribu- tion to ergonomic stress. b. Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors. Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include: i. Development of proper work techniques for employees to use when carrying and jogging materials. ii. New employee work hardening policies which slowly work new employees up to a full 12 hour shift. iii. Development of a monitoring program to ensure that all employees continue to use proper work practices. iv. Adjustment of line speeds or staffing as required to ensure that stresses are not increased because of a shortage of personnel. v. Adjustment of work practices to account for changes in size and weight of paper being handled. c. Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonom- ist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change of work methods. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable to this workplace include: i. Work station design which take into consideration the varying height of employees. Lifting and jogging tasks should be done at a level where employees can keep their wrists in a neutral position with a relaxed grip. ii. Extentions on the size of the pockets that feed the binders. This modification could increase employee recovery time between lifting/jogging tasks. iii. A vibrating table with an air dispensing through table surface. This modification may reduce the need for jogging. iv. An air ionization system to reduce static cling between pages. STEP 1 - Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3, above. STEP 2 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement, outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in items 4(a) - 4(c). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. STEP 3 - Implementation of administrative, work practice and engineer- ing controls, as described in items 4(a) - 4(c), above.
Recent events (2)
- — A (S) $200.00
- — Z (S) $1300.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Aug 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
- — A (O) $900.00
- — Z (O) $900.00
1904.4
- Issued
- Aug 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — A (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.95 G07 I
- Issued
- Aug 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 1993
8111
Recent events (2)
- — A (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Brown Printing Company
View Brown Printing Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 102931318.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.