Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: KEYSER DEVELOPMENT CO., INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of KEYSER DEVELOPMENT CO., INC in FAIRVIEW & CREEK ROADS, GLENMORE, PA 19343 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102944675.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Keyser Development CO., INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Keyser Development CO., INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
FAIRVIEW & CREEK ROADS
City
GLENMORE
State
PA
ZIP
19343
Mailing
809 MERRIMAC LN., UNIONVILLE, PA 19375
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1542
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 31, 1997
Abate by
Nov 8, 1997
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to crushing and struck by hazards:
a) New Glenmore Post Office (19343) - On 09/05/97 workers were exposed to
crushing
and struck by hazards due to the inadequate temporary bracing and
resultant collapse of
the pre-fab wooden roof trusses.  There were 43 trusses with a span of 59
feet that had
been set atop the 11.5 foot high wall top plates.  The trusses were
approximately 11.5
feet from the bottom chord to the top chord.  Workers had installed on the
trusses 8 top
chord lateral braces and 3 bottom chord lateral braces only.  There were
no diagonal
braces on either the top or bottom chords nor were there any cross braces
at the
webbing.  The exterior ground bracing was also inadequate in that the
number
of ground
braces did not equal the number of required top chord lateral braces, also
there was no
lateral bracing, struts or end bracing installed on the ground braces.
These bracing
requirements were all detailed in publication "HIB-91 Summary Sheet"
issued by the
Truss Plate Institute.  Observed 09/08/97.
ABATEMENT NOTE: One feasible means of abatement would be to install
temporary
bracing in accordance with the Truss Plate Institute publication "HIB-91
Summary
Sheet".
NOTE:  ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S)
  • · Z (S) $1500.00

1926.501 B15

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 31, 1997
Abate by
Nov 8, 1997
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S)
  • · Z (S) $1500.00

1926.701 B

Deleted Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 31, 1997
Abate by
Nov 8, 1997
Penalty
Initial $225
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S)
  • · Z (S) $225.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 102944675.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.