CLEVELAND, OH —
OSHA Inspection: CLEPRO, INC.
Follow-up inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a follow-up safety inspection of CLEPRO, INC. in 6800 UNION AVENUE, CLEVELAND, OH 44105 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103020343.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLEPRO, INC.
- Site address
- 6800 UNION AVENUE
- City
- CLEVELAND
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Follow-up (F)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3469
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 13, 1988
- Abate by
- Dec 22, 1988
- Penalty
- Initial $120 · Current $120
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: No positive means of protection were being used where the absence of effective blocking of the starting mechanism would subject employees to the hazards of being caught in, crushing, amputation and death while working to perform inspections, adjustments, and maintenance on equipment and machinery: a) Although some protection was provided by the tag on the Hiles and Jones #3 shear, no positive lock out of its power source was in use. b) Although some protection was provided by the tag on the Cincinnati #2 shear, no positive lock out of it's power source was in use. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to establish and enforce an adequate plant lockout/tagout procedure such as that stipulated by NFPA 70E-1983. National Fire Protection Association Standard for Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces. Essential elements of the lockout tagout procedure would include: 1) Develop safe work practices for de-energizing circuits and equipment to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from direct or indirect electrical contacts when the work is performed near or on equipment circuits which are or may be energized. These practices shall be consistent with the nature and extent of the associated electrical hazards and developed before the circuits and equipment are de-energized (1910.333(a) and 333 (b)(1)(A)(i)). 2) De-engergize live parts to which an employee may be exposed before the employee works on or near them, unless it can be demonstrated that de-energizing introduces additional or increased hazards or is infeasible due to equipment design or operational limitations. In such cases, the procedures outlined in item 9 for working on energized equipment shall be followed (1910.333(a)(1). 3) Disconnect all electric sources from circuits and equipment upon which work is to be performed. Control circuit devices, such as push buttons, selector switches and interlocks, may not be used as the safe means for de-energizing circuits or equipment. Interlocks for electric equipment may not be used as a substitute for lockout and tagging procedures (1910.333(b)(2)(i)(b). 4) Release stored electrical energy in circuits and equipment which might endanger personnel. Capacitors shall be discharged and high capacitance elements shall be short-circuited and grounded (1910.333(b)(2)(i)(c). 5) Place a lock and a tag on each disconnecting means used to de- energize circuits and equipment on which work is to be performed. The The lock shall be attached so as to prevent persons from operating the disconnecting means unless they resort to undue force or use of tools. The tag shall contain a statement prohibiting unauthorized operations of the disconnecting means and removal of the tag (1910. 333(b)(1)(2)(A). 6) If a lock cannot be applied, a tag may be used without a lock provided the following additional requirements are met: i) Tags are of a distinctive, employer-standardized, design that clearly prohibits unauthorized enrgizing of circuits and removal of the tag. ii) Additional safety measures, such as removal of isolating circuits elements, blocking of controlling switches or opening extra disconnecting devices, are employed. iii) Only one circuit or piece of equipment is de-energized. iv) The tagout period does not extend beyond the work shift. v) All persons who have access to controlling devices are trained and familiar with the employer's tagging procedures (1910.333(b)(2)(ii) (c) and (d). 7) A qualified person, see 29 CFR 1910.399(a)(100), shall operate the equipment operating controls or otherwise verify that the equipment cannot be restarted. The qualified person shall use test equipment to test circuit elements and electrical parts to which employees will be exposed and shall verify that the circuit elements and equipment parts are de-energized before work is allowed to proceed. The test shall also determine if any energized condition exists as a result of inadvertently induced voltage or unrelated voltage backfeed even though specific parts of the circuit have been de-energized and presumed to be safe (1910.333(b)(2)(iii). 8) Before circuits or equipment are re-energized, even temporarily, a qualified person shall conduct tests and visual inspections, as necessary, to verify all tools, electrical jumpers, shorts, grounds and other such devices have been removed so that the circuits and equipment can be safely energized. A visual determination shall be made to assure all employees are clear of circuits and equipments before they are energized (1910.333(b)(2)(iv). 9) Only qualified persons may work on electric circuit parts or equipment that have not been de-energized in accordance with items 1 through 8 above. Such persons shall be capable of working safely on energized circuits and shall be familiar with proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment, insulating and shielding, materials, and insulating tools. Safety-related work practices shall be developed which are suitable to the work being performed and for the voltage level of the exposed electric conductors or circuit parts (1910.333(a)(a) and (c). 10) Employees who may reasonably be expected to face a risk of injury due to electric shock or other electrical hazards shall be trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices outlined in item 1 through 7 above the pertain to their respective job assignments. Furthermore, qualified persons (i.e. those permitted to work or near exposed energized parts) shall, in addition to the above training requirements, also be trained in and familiar with the following: i) The skills and techniques necessary to distinguish exposed live parts from other parts of electric equipment. ii) The skills and techniques necessary to determine the nominal voltage or exposed live parts. iii) Safety-related work practices used to protect employees against contact with energized circuit parts directly with any part of their body or indirectly through other conductive objects (1910.332(b)(1) -(3).
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Dec 13, 1988
- Abate by
- Dec 22, 1988
- Penalty
- Initial $120 · Current $120
1910.252 D01 I
- Issued
- Dec 13, 1988
- Abate by
- Dec 22, 1988
1910.252 D02 IV
- Issued
- Dec 13, 1988
- Abate by
- Dec 22, 1988
More inspections at Clepro, INC.
View Clepro, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 103020343.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.