Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: HAARMANN & REIMER CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HAARMANN & REIMER CORPORATION in 5600 BRENTLINGER DRIVE, DAYTON, OH 45414 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103031142.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Haarmann & Reimer Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Haarmann & Reimer Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5600 BRENTLINGER DRIVE
City
DAYTON
State
OH
ZIP
45414
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (Y)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2869
Employees
87
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 8 instances 32 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Oct 10, 1991
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to:
a) Where employees are required to enter confined spaces to perform
various maintenance, repair, and clean-up activities were exposed to the
hazards of entering a confined space which could have contained hazard-
ous airborne contaminants such as but not limited to carbon dioxide,
ammonia, chlorine, nitrogen, and hydrogen or lacked sufficient oxygen
without adequate confined space entry procedures.
1) During the time period April through August 1991 confined space
entry procedures were not followed in that:
a. Monitoring for toxic and combustible gases and/or oxygen
deficiency was not done prior to and/or during at least five separate
entries.
b. Mechanical ventilation was not used or continued for confined
space entry.
c. Standby personnel were not always properly trained.
d. Standby rescue equipment was not available during at least two
separate entries.
e. Standby rescue personnel were not always available at the confined
space during at least one entry.
f. The confined space rescue procedures did not include a specific
procedure for summoning assistance.
g. Confined spaces were not evaluated prior to entry for special entry
requirements which may be encountered if a rescue is necessary.
Among other methods of abatement of the hazards, one feasible method to
abate these deficiencies, includes, but is not limited to the following:
1)   Require employees to obtain written authorization, signed by at least
one supervisor prior to confined space entry.  (confined space entry
permit).  The permit must indicate special precautions and time period
for which it is valid.
2)   Lockout, blocking or equivalent of all mechanical, electrical, liquid
and gas systems relating to the confined space that may create a hazar d
during entry should these systems be put in motion or otherwise ac-
tivated.
3)   Testing of the atmosphere prior to entry into the confined space and
on a regular basis during occupancy  for presence of sufficient oxygen
(19.5%) and absence of hazardous levels of toxic or combustible gases
(maximum 10% LEL) or dusts.  When toxic substances are present for
which no equipment to test the atmosphere is available, the employee
shall be permitted to enter the confined space only with the use of ai r
supplied respiratory equipment and other appropriate personal protec-
tive equipment.
4)   Establish a tag-out system to mark the confined space unsafe for entry
should tests indicate the space is unsafe for entry.  Marking is to
remain in place until tests indicate entry is safe.
5)   Mechanical ventilation of the confined space prior to entry and
continued ventilation during entry to assure a safe atmosphere.
6)   Written emergency rescue procedures with a requirement that trained
personnel are available and are stationed outside of the confined
space with proper equipment to provide forthe rescue   of persons
entering the space.  Such equipment must include safety harness and
lifelines with provisions for hoisting employees from the confined
space.  If entry is required for rescue, the rescue employee must
be equipped with approved air supplied respiratory equipment and other
appropriate personal protective equipment.
7)   The confined space entry procedures shall be written and the
responsible employees shall be trained in all aspects of the
procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $2500.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.20 G01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 03 1 instance 87 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Oct 10, 1991
Penalty
Initial $2,125 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (O) $200.00
  • · Z (S) $2125.00

1910.147 C06 IC

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 28 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Oct 10, 1991
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $1000.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 28 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Oct 10, 1991
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $2000.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.147 F03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 28 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Sep 27, 1991
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $2000.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Oct 10, 1991
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $2500.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious Gravity 03 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Sep 27, 1991
Penalty
Initial $2,125 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (O) $500.00
  • · Z (S) $2125.00

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 03 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Sep 20, 1991
Penalty
Initial $2,125 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $500.00
  • · Z (S) $2125.00

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 00 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Sep 27, 1991
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.141 A03 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 1991
Abate by
Sep 27, 1991
Recent events (2)
  • · F (O)
  • · Z (O)

View Haarmann & Reimer Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 103031142.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.