COLUMBUS, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN OHIO FABRICATORS,INC DBA SOFCO ERECTORS
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of SOUTHERN OHIO FABRICATORS,INC DBA SOFCO ERECTORS in 1275 WEST LANE AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43221 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103042701.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOUTHERN OHIO FABRICATORS,INC DBA SOFCO ERECTORS
- Site address
- 1275 WEST LANE AVENUE
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43221
- Mailing
- 10333 WAYNE AVENUE, CINCINNATI, OH 45213
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1791
- Employees
- 28
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 31, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $10,000
General-duty citation text
SECTION 5(A)(1) OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970: THE EMPLOYER DID NOT FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND A PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT WHICH WERE FREE FROM RECOGNIZED HAZARDS THAT WERE CAUSING OR LIKELY TO CAUSE DEATH OR SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM TO EMPLOYEES IN THAT EMPLOYEES WERE EXPOSED TO: A) WORKERS WERE EXPOSED TO THE HAZARDS OF FALLS, CRUSHING, AND DEATH WHEN THE EMPLOYER DID NOT PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT A BUILDING ERECTION PLAN. PROJECT NO 100-87-016, DRAWING-31 STRUCTURAL NOTES AND DETAILS, ITEM A.1, READS AS FOLLOWS: "THE STRUCTURE IS DESIGNED TO BE SELF-SUPPORTING AND STABLE AFTER THE BUILDING IS FULLY COMPLETE. IT IS SOLELY THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE ERECTION PROCEDURES AND SEQUENCE TO INSURE THE SAFETY OF THE BUILDING AND ITS COMPONENT PARTS DURING SHORING, SHEETING, TEMPORARY BRACING, GUYS OR TIEDOWNS WHICH MIGHT BE NECESSARY. SUCH MATERIAL SHALL REMAIN THE CONTRACTOR'S PROPERTY AFTER COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT." ITEM A.2 READS AS FOLLOWS: "ITEM IS SOLELY THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY CODES AND REGULATIONS DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION." IN ANSI A10.13-1989 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS STEEL ERECTION SAFETY REQUIREMENTS, UNDER 4.JOB PLANNING 4.1 "SURVEY OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED", STATES: "PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK, THE EMPLOYER SHALL MAKE A SURVEY OF THE WORK TO BE DONE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS; BY DISCUSSION WITH THE OWNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, GENERAL CONTRACTOR, AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER; AND BY A PHYSICAL SURVEY OF THE JOB SITE." THE HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ERECTION OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURE CAN BE ABATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FORMAL REASONED SEQUENTIAL APPROACH TO THE ERECTION PROCESS. ANSI A10.13 CONTAINS GUIDANCE CONCERNING SAFE ERECTION PROCEDURES. THE MINIMUM CONTENT OF THE ERECTION PLAN CAN BE EXPECTED TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: 1) COLLECT NEEDED INFORMATION- IF NECESSARY, REVIEW THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WITH THE ARCHITECT AND DESIGN ENGINEER FIRM. ESTABLISH AN UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING THE UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE BUILDING, STRESSES, AND WEIGHT ON THE COMPONENTS. 2) DEVELOPMENT AN ORDERED PLAN FOR THE ERECTION OF THE BUILDING. 3) INSTRUCT AND TRAIN SUPERVISORS, FOREMEN, AND WORKERS IN THE PLAN AND PROCEDURES THAT WILL BE USED, AND WHAT TO DO IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY. 4) PERFORM THE TASK(S) WHILE MONITORING FOR HAZARDS THAT MAY DEVELOP. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE PLAN IS FLAWED AND THAT SITUATIONS WILL DEVELOPMENT THAT WERE NOT ANTICIPATED. THE WORKERS AND MANAGERS NEED TO BE GIVEN CLEAR INSTRUCTION TO GET KNOWLEDGEABLE ORDER BEFORE PROCEEDING INTO A PLANNED ERECTION PROCEDURE.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 31, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $10,000
General-duty citation text
SECTION 5(A)(1) OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970: THE %% EMPLOYER DID NOT FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND A PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT WHICH WERE FREE FROM RECOGNIZED HAZARDS THAT WERE CAUSING OR LIKELY TO CAUSEDEATH OR SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM TO EMPLOYEES IN THAT EMPLOYEES WERE EXPOSED TO: A) WORKERS WERE EXPOSED TO THE HAZARDS OF BUILDING COLLAPSE. THE EMPLOYER IS IN VIOLATION OF RECOGNIZED PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF STEEL ERECTION AND OF THE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS-STEEL ERECTION SAFETY REQUIREMENTS, ANSI A10.13-1989, PARAGRAGH 11.1 (SECOND SENTENCE), WHICH READS: "THE SEQUENCE OF ERECTION BOLTING, TEMPORARY GUYING, RIVETING, AND WELDING SHALL BE SUCH AS TO MAINTAIN THE STABILITY OF THE STRUCTURAL FORM AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION. CONSIDERATION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE DEAD WEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE, WEIGHT, AND WORKING REACTIONS OF ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT PLACED THEREON AND ALL EXTERNAL FORCES THAT MAY BE APPLIED." THE HAZARDS OF THE COLLAPSE CAN BE ABATED BY A PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING FACTORS: 1) PLUMB THE COLUMNS OF THE BUILDING. 2) CONNECT THE BEAMS TO THE COLUMNS. 3) USING DIAGONAL GUYING, WHICH IS ATTACHED BETWEEN THE COLUMN AND A BEAM TO BE LEVELED, DO THE FOLLOWING: A) LOOSEN THE CONNECTION BOLTS, IF NEEDED. B) POSITION THE BEAM SO THAT IT IS ALIGNED WITH THE BOLT HOLES IN A HORIZONTAL POSITION. C) PLACE FULL-SIZED BOLTS THROUGH THE FLANGE ATTACHMENT HOLES. D) TORQUE THE BOLTS TO SPECIFICATIONS. 4) CHECK THAT COLUMN/BEAM MEETS ERECTION SPECIFICATIONS. 5) REMOVE DIAGONAL BRACING.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $10000.00
- · Z (W) $10000.00
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Oct 31, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $10,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $10000.00
- · Z (W) $10000.00
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Oct 31, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1990
- Penalty
- Current $5,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $5000.00
- · Z (W)
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Oct 31, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1990
Recent events (2)
- · F (W)
- · Z (W)
1926.28 A
- Issued
- Oct 31, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $10,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $10000.00
- · Z (W) $10000.00
1926.750 B01 II
- Issued
- Oct 31, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $5000.00
- · Z (W) $10000.00
1926.750 B02 I
- Issued
- Oct 31, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1990
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (W)
1926.105 A
- Issued
- Oct 31, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1990
Recent events (2)
- · F (W)
- · Z (W)
More inspections at Southern Ohio Fabricators,Inc DBA Sofco Erectors
View Southern Ohio Fabricators,Inc DBA Sofco Erectors's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 103042701.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.