Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PARMET CO., INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PARMET CO., INC. in 5745 AVERY ROAD, AMLIN, OH 43026 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103043550.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Parmet CO., INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Parmet CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PARMET CO., INC.
Site address
5745 AVERY ROAD
City
AMLIN
State
OH
ZIP
43026
Mailing
5745 AVERY ROAD, AMBER, OH 43026
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1794
Employees
8
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 1991
Abate by
Dec 9, 1991
Penalty
Initial $1,950 · Current $1,950
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to:
a.  Amlin, Ohio, 5745 Avery Road: The Grove RT 65-S mobile
hydraulic crane did not have a positive acting device which prevents
contact between the overhaul ball and the boom tip (anti-two-blocking
device) when lifting equipment from flat bed trailers exposing
employees to a struck by hazard.  Among other methods one feasible
and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to install an anti-
two-blocking device.
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $1950.00
  • · Z (S) $1950.00

1926.550 A06

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 1991
Abate by
Dec 9, 1991
Penalty
Initial $1,950 · Current $875 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $875.00
  • · Z (S) $1950.00

1926.550 A17

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 1991
Abate by
Dec 9, 1991
Penalty
Initial $1,950 · Current $875 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $875.00
  • · Z (S) $1950.00

1926.550 B02

Serious Gravity 05 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 1991
Abate by
Dec 9, 1991
Penalty
Initial $1,950 · Current $875 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $875.00
  • · Z (S) $1950.00

1903.2 A01

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 1991
Abate by
Nov 10, 1991
Penalty
Initial $750
Recent events (2)
  • · F (O)
  • · Z (O) $750.00

1904.2 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 1991
Abate by
Dec 9, 1991
Recent events (2)
  • · F (O)
  • · Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 103043550.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.