GREEN BAY, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: MIDWEST DENTAL INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MIDWEST DENTAL INC in 844 WILLARD DR., SUITE E, GREEN BAY, WI 54304 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103079687.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIDWEST DENTAL INC
- Site address
- 844 WILLARD DR., SUITE E
- City
- GREEN BAY
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54304
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8021
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
16 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 8, 1990
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
8880
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the following conditions which increase the risk of employees contracting blood-borne diseases: An HBV vaccination program was not made available to the following employees: a) Dentists whose work duties include direct patient care, direct injection of anesthetics and invasive dental procedures. b) Dental Assistants whose work duties include direct patient care in conjunction with the dentist's procedures, instrument handling and washing. c) Dental Hygienists whose work duties include direct patient care, cleaning procedures using various instruments, polishing equipment and an ultrasonic cleaner which can result in widespread splattering of blood/saliva, and occasional washing of contaminated instruments and equipment. d) An X-ray technician whose work duties, include the handling of potentially contaminated materials (e.g., bloody guaze) during patient preparation for X-rays. e) An office housekeeper whose work duties include disposal of blood contaminated waste and clean-up of blood spills on walls or floors. In accordance with recommended practices from the CDC's guidelines for protection from blood-borne diseases, feasible methods of abatement include, but are not limited to: 1) An evaluation of exposure potential based on job duties leading to exposure to infectious materials as a universal precaution. Employees requiring inclusion in an HBV vaccination program shall include but not be limited to those employees listed in the instance description. 2) Make available Hepatitis B (HBV) vaccinations to all potentially exposed employees (e.g., instances listed). 3) Initiate a complete medical surveillance program to allow early identification of HBV infection in non-immunized personnel, track immunization status and provide booster HBV vaccinations as necessary.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 8, 1990
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 1990
8880
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the following conditions which increase the risk of employees contracting blood-borne diseases: Appropriate post exposure evaluation and follow-up procedures were not implemented for the following employees: a) In the central sterilization area, a dental assistant who was punctured with a blood contaminated instrument while removing instruments from the ultrasonic cleaner. b) In the central sterilization area, a dental hygienist who was punctured with a blood contaminated instrument while scrubbing the sink. In accordance with recommded practices from the CDC's guidelines for protection from blood-borne diseases, feasible methods of abatement include, but are not limited to: 1) Implement a determination and documentation of the exposure incident describing: -route of exposure -source patient's antibody status (positive, negative or unknown) -circumstances under which exposure occurred. 2) Request permission from the source patient for antigen/antibody testing HBV or HIV infection status. Such testing is voluntary for the source patient. 3) Offer blood collection and antibody testing to the exposed employee as soon as possible after the exposure incident. Blood testing is voluntary for the employee. Actual antigen/antibody testing may be done at the time of collection or at a later date if the employee so requests. Follow-up testing should be continued according to current standard medical procedures. 4) Provide counseling and illness reporting advice to the exposed employee. 5) Make available information on the exposed employee's job duties as relates to the exposure and on the exposure incident to the evaluating physician. Any medical assessment or written opinion from the evaluating physician must be kept as a medical record, with a copy made available to the employee within 15 working days.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $450
8880
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the following conditions which increase the risk of employees contracting blood-borne diseases: An HBV vaccination program was not made available to the following employees: a) Dentists whose work duties include direct patient care, direct injection of anesthetics and invasive dental procedures. b) Dental Assistants whose work duties include direct patient care in conjunction with the dentist's procedures, instrument handling and washing. c) Dental Hygienists whose work duties include direct patient care, cleaning procedures using various instruments, polishing equipment and a ultrasonic cleaner which can result in widespread splattering of blood/saliva, and occasional washing of contaminated instruments and equipment. d) An X-ray technician whose work duties include the handling of potentially contaminated materials (e.g., bloody gauze) during patient preparation for X-rays. e) An office housekeeper whose work duties include disposal of blood contaminated waste and clean-up of blood spills on walls or floors. In accordance with recommended practices from the CDC's guidelines for protection from blood-borne diseases, feasible methods of abatement include, but are not limited to: 1) An evaluation of exposure potential based on job duties leading to exposure to infectious materials as a universal precaution. Employees requiring inclusion in an HBV vaccination program shall include but not be limited to those employees listed in the instance descriptions. 2) Make available Hepatitis B (HBV) vaccinations to all potentially exposed employees (e.g., instances listed). 3) Initiate a complete medical surveillance program to allow early identification of HBV infection in non-immunized personnel, track immunization status and provide booster HBV vaccinations as necessary.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $450.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $540 · Current $400 Reduced
8880
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the following conditions which increase the risk of employees contracting blood-borne diseases: A complete and effective training and information program on the hazards of blood-borne diseases and effective precautions for reducing the risk of infection was not made available to the following employees: a) Dentists whose work duties include direct patient care, direct injection of anesthetics and invasive dental procedures. b) Dental Assistants whose work duties include direct patient care in conjuction with the dentist's procedures, instrument handling and washing. c) Dental Hygienists whose work duties include direct patient care, cleaning procedures using various instruments, polishing equipment and a ultrasonic cleaner which can result in widespread splattering of blood-saliva, and occasional washing of contaminated instruments and equipment. d) An X-ray technician whose work duties include the handling of potentially contaminated materials (e.g., bloody guaze) during patient preparation for X-rays. e) An office housekeeper whose work duties include disposal of blood contaminated waste and clean-up of blood spills on walls or floors. In accordance with recommended practices from the CDC's guidelines for protection from blood-borne diseases, feasible methods of abatement include, but are not limited to the provision of training and information in the following categories: 1) Hazards --e.g., risk factors, illness descriptions, epidemiology and potential for fetal risk. 2) Protective Measures -- e.g., engineering controls, personal protective equipment, biohazard labeling. 3) Emergency or Non-routine Procedures -- e.g., precautions for CPR, spill cleanup and exposure incidence reports and tracking. 4) Medical Procedures -- e.g., medical treatment, surveillance and records.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $400.00
- · Z (S) $540.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $540 · Current $100 Reduced
8880
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $100.00
- · Z (S) $540.00
1910.132 C
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 1989
8880
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 1989
8880
1910.141 A04 I
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $150 Reduced
8880
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $150.00
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.145 F08 I
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $225 Reduced
8880
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $180 Reduced
195313611774
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $180.00
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $100 Reduced
1631
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $100.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
163117201774
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $135 Reduced
1774172015600670
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $135.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $180 · Current $95 Reduced
1774172015600670
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $95.00
- · Z (S) $180.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $3,600
8880
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the following conditions which increase the risk of employees contracting blood-borne diseases: Appropriate post exposure evaluation and follow-up procedures were not implemented for the following employees: a) In the central sterilization area, a dental assistant who was punctured with a blood-contaminated instrument while removing instruments from the ultrasonic cleaner. b) In the central sterilization area, a dental hygienist who was punctured with a blood-contaminated instrument while scrubbing in the sink. In accordance with recommended practices from the CDC's guidelines for protection from blood-borne diseases, feasible methods of abatement include, but are not limited to: 1) Implement a determination and documentation of the exposure incident describing: - route of exposure - source patient's antibody status (positive, negative or unknown) - circumstances under which exposure occurred. 2) Request permission from the source patient for antigen/antibody testing HBV or HIV infection status. Such testing is voluntary for the source patient. 3) Offer blood collection and antibody testing to the exposed employee as soon as possible after the exposure incident. Blood testing is voluntary for the employee. Actual antibody/antigen testing may be done at the time of collection or at a later date if the employee so requests. Follow-up testing should be continued according to current standard medical procedures. 4) Provide counseling and illness reporting advice to the exposed employee. 5) Make available information on the exposed employee's job duties as relates to the exposure and on the exposure incident to the evaluating physician. Any medical assessment or written opinion from the evaluating physician must be kept as a medical record, with a copy made available to the employee within 15 working days.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $3600.00
- · Z (W) $3600.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 1989
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 103079687.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.