OSHA Inspection: DAYTON-WALTHER CORPORATION/MORAINE DIV.

Issued

Jul 20, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 12, 1989

Penalty

Initial $700 · Current $400 Reduced

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 12, 1989

Penalty

Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 28, 1989

Penalty

Initial $600 · Current $400 Reduced

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 12, 1989

Penalty

Initial $600 · Current $500 Reduced

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 12, 1989

Penalty

Initial $900 · Current $200 Reduced

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Sep 15, 1989

Penalty

Initial $900 · Current $900

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 12, 1989

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Sep 15, 1989

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
(a)
Location:  Drum Machining Area.
Equipment: M-42 Unimate robot operation.
Condition: On or about May 17, 1989 a first shift operator servicing
and/or adjusting the Natco multi-spindle drill press was
within the range of the Unimate robot Serial #112030 and
was exposed to the hazard of being struck by or pinned
between fixed objects by the robot and was not protected
from accidental and/or inadvertent operation of the robot.
One feasible and acceptable method of abatement is use of
a comprehensive "lockout" procedure. Essentials of a lock-
out procedure include:
ESSENTIALS OF A LOCKOUT PROGRAM
1) Before any maintenance, inspection, cleaning, adjusting or servicing
of equipment (electrical, mechanical or other) that requires entrance
into or close contact with the machinery or equipment, the main power
disconnect switch or valve, or both, controlling its source of power
or flow of material, shall be locked out or blocked off with padlock,
blank flange, or similar device. Residual energy in equipment having
systems such as pneumatic, hydraulic, compressed springs or other
shall have these systems bled off, blocked or other effective means
implemented to ensure that all sources of energy have been
deactivated. Prior to any work commencing, however, it must be
verified that the equipment has been rendered safe (either by the
use of electrical test equipment or by attempting to activate the
equipment).
2) Locks keyed separately to ensure removal only by the authorized
person shall be provided to each person working in areas requiring
a lockout. Where more than one person is involved in a single
operation, or where multiple operations such as both electrical and
mechanical maintenance) are being simultaneously performed on a
single piece of equipment, locks shall be used by each person.
3) A written lockout policy shall be established including procedures
for locking out equipment or machinery. Employees involved in
implementing the program shall be trained in all elements thereof.
4) There shall be regualr enforcement and periodic evaluation of the
program to ensure usage and adequacy of the program.

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
(a)
Location:  Drum Machining Area.
Equipment: M-42 Unimate robot operation.
Condition: On or about May 17, 1989 a second shift operator servicing
and/or adjusting the Natco multi-spindle drill press was
within the range of the Unimate robot Serial #112030 and
was exposed to the hazard of being struck by or pinned
between fixed objects by the robot and was not protected
from accidental and/or inadvertent operation of the robot.
One feasible and acceptable method of abatement is use of
a comprehensive "lock-out" procedure.

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from ecognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
(a)
Location:   Drum Machining Area
Eequipment: M-42 Unimate robot operation.
Condition:  On or about May 17, 1989 a third shift operator servicing
and/or adjusting the Natco multi-spindle drill press was
within the range of the Unimate robot Serial #112030 and
was exposed to the hazard of being struck by or pinned
between fixed objects by the robot and was not protected
from accidental and/or inadvertent operation of the robot.
One feasible and acceptable method of abatement is use of
a comprehensive "lock-out" procedure.

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
(a)
Location:  Drum Machining Area:
Equipment: M-42 Unimate robot operation.
Condition: On or about May 17, 1989 a first shift set-up person
servicing and/or adjusting the Natco multi-spindle drill
press was within the range of the Unimate robot Serial
#112030 and was exposed to the hazard of being struck
by or pinned between fixed objects by the robot and was
not protected from accidental and/or inadvertent method
of abatement is use of a comprehensive "lock-out"
procedure.

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
(a)
Location:  Drum Machining Area.
Equipment: M-42 Unimate robot operation.
Condition: On or about May 17, 1989 a second shift set-up person
servicing and/or adjusting the Natco multi-spindle drill
press was within the range of the Unimate robot Serial
#112030 and was exposed to the hazard of being struck
by or pinned between fixed objects by the robot and was
not protected from accidental and/or inadvertent operation
of the robot. One feasible and acceptable method of
abatement is use of a comprehensive "lock-out" procedure.

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
(a)
Location:  Drum Machining Area
Equipment: M-42 Unimate-robot operation.
Condition: On or about May 17, 1989 a third shift set-up person
servicing and/or adjusting the Natco multi-spindle drill
press was within the range of the Unimate robot Serial
#112030 and was exposed to the hazard of being struck by or
pinned between fixed objects by the robot and was not
protected from accidental and/or inadvertent operation of
the robot. One feasible and acceptable method of abatement is
use of a comprehensive "lock-out" procedure.

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
(a)
Location:  Drum Machining Area.
Equipment: M-42 Unimate robot operation.
Condition: On or about May 17, 1989 maintenance employees servicing
and/or adjusting the Natco multi-spindle drill press were
within the range of the Unimate robot Serial #112030 and
were exposed to the hazard of being struck by or pinned
between fixed objects by the robot and were not protected
from accidental and/or inadvertent operation of the robot.
One feasible and acceptable method of abatement is use of
a comprehensive "lock-out" procedure.

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000

Issued

Jun 28, 1989

Abate by

Jul 23, 1989

Penalty

Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000