Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: BAY WEST PAPER COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BAY WEST PAPER COMPANY in 700 COLUMBIA AVE., MIDDLETOWN, OH 45042 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103228383.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BAY West Paper Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BAY West Paper Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
700 COLUMBIA AVE.
City
MIDDLETOWN
State
OH
ZIP
45042
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2679
Employees
169
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.179 B05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 1999
Abate by
Jan 28, 2000
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000.00
  • — Z (S) $4500.00

1910.184 D

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 1999
Abate by
Dec 14, 1999
Penalty
Initial $4,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $4500.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 1999
Abate by
Jan 28, 2000
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
in the wet end area were exposed to the potential of falling loads,
hoists, and/or hoist
components due to the following condiitons:
a)  Two Coffing 1 and 1/4 ton hoists, in the wet end area, were not marked
on the bridge to
show its rated capacity. The bridge showed signs of deterioration, in that
the left portion of the
bridge was blocked off to prevent its use due to the poor condition of the
bridge. Moisture from
the wet end had rusted the beam.
b) The two Coffing 1 and 1/4 ton hoists in the wet end, were not separated
by a bumper to
prevent damage to internal parts, in that the hoists were hitting together
on the bridge.
c) The newly installed Jib Hoist in the wet end area was not marked to
show its rated capacity
on the supporting structure.
One feasible and acceptable method of abatement is to develop and adopt
rules and procedures
which are consistent with ANSI B30.16 including weight capacity to be seen
from the floor on
both sides of the bridge; bumpers  be installed to prevent damage when two
hoists are on a
bridge, and when a new hoist is installed, the hoisting and supporting
structures be marked to
show its rated capacity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4500.00
  • — Z (S) $4500.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 103228383.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.