CINCINNATI, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: CINCINNATI SPORTS MEDICINE & ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER IN
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CINCINNATI SPORTS MEDICINE & ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER IN in 311 STRAIGHT STREET, CINCINNATI, OH 45219 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103242442.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CINCINNATI SPORTS MEDICINE & ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER IN
- Site address
- 311 STRAIGHT STREET
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45219
- Mailing
- 1 LYTLE PLACE SUITE 415, CINCINNATI, OH 45202
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8062
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 12, 1990
- Abate by
- May 23, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $490
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a) Employees having contact with human blood and body fluids were exposed to the hazards of bloodborne diseases in that the training of these employees in regard to "Universal Precautions" had not yet been conducted. Also, the employer's training program for all affected employees did not specify procedures for corrective action to the taken if blood-permeable clothing being worn by employees would become contaminated with human blood or body fluids. In addition, employees had not been instructed on proper disposal pro- cedures of all needles contaminated with human blood to prevent re-capping of contaminated needles and possible needle sticks. A feasible method of abatement would include the training of all employees exposed to human blood and body fluids which must cover: Precautionary measures, epidemiology, modes of transmission and prevention of HIV/HBV and other associated infectious agents, the location and proper use of PPE, proper work practices, the concept of "universal precautions" and procedures to follow if employees exposure to a needlestick or other body fluids occurs and how to prevent needlesticks from occurring. Feasible methods for blood contaminated employee clothing would include but not necessarily be limited to the following options. All affected employees must be instructed to remove blood permeable clothing if it becomes contaminated with human blood to the extent that it may keep the blood in contact with employee skin. The removal should occur as soon as feasible and within the same general area in which the contamination occurred. The clothing which has become soaked or significantly contaiminated with human blood must be placed into an impermeable bag or container. If the clothing is disposable, it can be discarded in accordance with standard infectious waste procedures. If the clothing is non-disposable and employer-owned, it should be placed into an impermeable, sealed and properly labeled or color-coded bag and then opened only by trained laundry department workers wearing proper protective clothing and equipment. For amployee-owned and non-disposable clothing which has become soaked or significantly contaminated with patient blood, the garments could be tagged with the identity of the employee who owns the garment and then handled in the same manner as employer-owned garments. Alternatively, the employee-owned clothing can be disinfected with a sodium hypochlorite solution or other disinfectant before it is removed from the worksite and laundered by the employee. Regardless of what type of clothing may be involved, any area of employee skin which does become contaminated with patient blood must be quickly and thoroughly washed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $490.00
- · Z (S) $490.00
1910.141 A04 II
- Issued
- Apr 5, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $490
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $490.00
- · Z (S) $490.00
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 5, 1990
- Abate by
- May 23, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $210 · Current $210
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $210.00
- · Z (S) $210.00
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Apr 5, 1990
- Abate by
- May 23, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $210 · Current $210
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $210.00
- · Z (S) $210.00
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Apr 5, 1990
- Abate by
- May 23, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $210 · Current $210
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $210.00
- · Z (S) $210.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 103242442.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.