MT. STERLING, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: TANK SALES AND EQUIPMENT
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of TANK SALES AND EQUIPMENT in ROUTE 3, MT. STERLING, IL 62353 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103296026.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TANK SALES AND EQUIPMENT
- Site address
- ROUTE 3
- City
- MT. STERLING
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62353
- Mailing
- BOX 46, MT. STERLING, IL 62353
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7699
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1990
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $280 · Current $280
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Employee(s) entered various tanks, which were confined spaces having the potential for oxygen deficient atmospheres and/or hazardous levels of toxic or combustible gases. for the purpose of inspection and/or welding, and the procedures followed were inadequate to insure safe entry and egress in that: 1) The atmosphere inside the tanks was not tested for oxygen deficiency prior to entry to insure oxygen levels were adequate for breathing purposes and for the proper functioning of the cumbustible gas indicator. 2) The MSA Model 2A combustible gas indicator was not calibrated before each use according to manufacturer's directions using a known concentration of calibration gas. 3) The safety belt sometimes worn by the entrant working in tanks was not adequate in that it could cause him to block the exit manhole if he had to be rescued with the lifeline. Among other methods, a feasible and acceptable abatement method could include: 1) Institute a formal confined space entry program such as stipulated by ANSI Z117.1-1977, American National Standard of Safety Requirements for Working in Tanks and Confined Spaces, and OSHA's proposed standard 29 CFR 1910.146, Permit Required Confined Spaces. A minimally acceptable confined space entry procedure consists of the following elements: a) Written procedures including ventilation, atmospheric testing, rescue procedures, personal protective equipment, and employee training. b) Provide mechanical ventilation of the confined space prior to entry and during occupancy to assure a safe atmosphere. c) Test the atmosphere in the confined space prior to entry and on a regular basis during occupancy for the presence fo sufficient oxygen (minimum 19.5%) and the absence of hazardous levels of toxic or combustible gases, where such gases may be present. Measurements shall be made with instrucments calibrated daily or before each use according to manufacturer's instructions. Instrument operators shall be trained in the use and care of instruments. d) Personal protective equipment such as respirators shall be chosen and provided on the basis of testing and monitoring. Users of this equipment shall be trained on its use and limitation. Respiratory equipment shall be used in accordance with Section .134 of 29 CFR 1910 General Industry Standards. A safety harness with attached lifeline shall be worn during entry that will allow the entrant to be rescued through manholes of restriced size. e) An attendant shall be stationed outside the confined space and shall maintain effective and continous contact with the entrant during entry. The attendant shall be properly trained in hazard recognition and rescue procedures. f) Employees who are required to work in a confined space shall be trained in all aspects of the confined space program, including hazard recognition, communication with the attendant, use of protective equipment, and emergency rescue procedures. Disclaimer: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement methods suggested by OSHA; b) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases; c) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an effective abatement method.
1910.252 E04 IV
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 1990
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $200 · Current $200
1910.134 B02
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 1990
1910.134 B07
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 1990
1910.134 B10
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 1990
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jun 11, 1990
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 1990
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 103296026.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.