Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: PRO TRAN

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PRO TRAN in 5TH AND INDIANA, HINDSBORO, IL 61930 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103305900.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch PRO Tran for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for PRO Tran is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PRO TRAN
Site address
5TH AND INDIANA
City
HINDSBORO
State
IL
ZIP
61930
Mailing
P. O. BOX 247, HINDSBORO, IL 61930
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
7699
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

22 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 1992
Abate by
Feb 18, 1992
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $160 Reduced
The alleged violations below have been  grouped  because  they  involve
%%
similar  or  related  hazards  that  may  increase  the  potential  for
illness.
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to:
A painter spray painting a tank trailer with NAPA Martin Seynour
white polyurethane enamel on 11-8-91 was exposed to hexamethylene
diisocyanate at a level of .035 parts per million (ppm) for an
18 minute sample period, and at a level of .042 ppm for another
18 minute sample period.  Both of these levels are in excess
of the NIOSH recommended ceiling exposure limit of .02 for a
15 minute period.  This recommended level was established to
prevent damage to the respiratory system.
Among other methods, a feasible and acceptable abatement method
could include:
1.   Replace the polyurethane enamel with a paint that does
not use an activator containing isocyanates.
2.   Provide adequate ventilation in the paint room to
reduce and maintain exposure to hexamethylene
diisocyanate below recommended exposure limits.
Disclaimer:
a.   The employer is not limited to abatement methods
suggested by OSHA;
b.   The methods explained are general and may not be
effective in all cases;
c.   The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying
out an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $160.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

1910.134 A02

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 1992
Abate by
Feb 18, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.134 B11

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 1992
Abate by
Feb 18, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.134 E05

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 1992
Abate by
Feb 18, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.134 E05 I

Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 1992
Abate by
Jan 17, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.1000 A03

Serious Gravity 02 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 1992
Abate by
Feb 18, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Feb 3, 1992
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $200 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to:
In October, 1991, and earlier dates, employees entered tank
trailers, which were confined spaces, for the purpose of
inspection and repair, and a confined space entry procedure
as outlined in the abatement methods was not followed.  Among
other methods, a feasible and acceptable abatement method could
include:
1.   Institute a formal confined space entry program such as
stipulated by ANSI Z117.1-1989, American National Standard
Safety Requirements for Confined Spaces, and OSHA's proposed
standard 29 CFR 1910.146, Permit Required Confined Spaces.
A minimally acceptable confined space entry program consists
of the following elements:
a.   Written procedures including a permit system,
ventilation, atmospheric testing, rescue procedures,
and employee training.
b.   Employees shall be required to obtain and post a
confined space entry permit signed by a supervisor
prior to confined space entry.  The permit shall
specify the location and type of work to be done and
certify that all existing and potential hazards have
been evaluated by a qualified person and necessary
protective measures have been taken to ensure the
safety of each worker.
c.   Provide mechanical ventilation of the confined space
prior to entry and during occupancy to assure a safe
atmosphere when determined necessary as described in
(b) above.
d.   Test the atmosphere in the confined space prior to
entry and on a regular basis during occupancy for the
presence of sufficient oxygen (minimum 19.5%) and the
absence of hazardous levels of toxic or combustible
gases, where such gases may be present.  Measurements
shall be made with instruments calibrated daily
according to manufacturers' instructions.  Instrument
operators shall be trained in the use and care of
instruments.
e.   Personal protective equipment such as respirators shall
be chosen on the basis of testing and monitoring.
Users of this equipment shall be trained on its use
and limitation.  Respiratory equipment shall be used
in accordance with section .134 of 29 CFR 1910 General
Industry Standards.  A safety harness with attached
lifeline shall be worn during entry that will allow
the entrant to be rescued through manholes of
restricted size.
f.   An attendant shall be stationed outside the permit
space and shall maintain effective and continuous
contact with authorized entrants during entry.  The
attendant shall be properly trained in hazard
recognition and rescue procedures.
g.   Employees who are required to work in a confined space
shall be trained in all aspects of the confined space
program, including hazard recognition, communication
with the attendant, use of protective equipment, and
emergency rescue procedures.
Disclaimer:
a.   The employer is not limited to the abatement methods
suggested by OSHA;
b.   The methods explained are general and may not be effective
in all cases;
c.   The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out
an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $200.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Feb 3, 1992
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $200.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1910.95 I03

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 17, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Feb 3, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.95 L01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 7, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 02 7 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Feb 3, 1992
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $160 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $160.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

1910.107 C08

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 7, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.305 B01

Serious Gravity 02 27 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Feb 3, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 24, 1992
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $200.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 7, 1992
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $120 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $120.00
  • · Z (S) $450.00

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Feb 3, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 17, 1992
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $160 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $160.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 02 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 17, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.1200 H

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 24, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1903.2 A01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 6, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.94 A05 V

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 1992
Abate by
Jan 31, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 103305900.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.