WAUKESHA, WI —
OSHA Inspection: JOURNAL SENTINEL INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JOURNAL SENTINEL INC. in 1801 DOLPHIN DRIVE, WAUKESHA, WI 53186 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103315297.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOURNAL SENTINEL INC.
- Site address
- 1801 DOLPHIN DRIVE
- City
- WAUKESHA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53186
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 661, MILWAUKEE, WI 53201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2711
- Employees
- 2930
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 26, 1989
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: The hazards of bursting or failing components caused by an unapproved pressure vessel on February 16,1989, at the old firs unit off press #3, in the west press room. The pressure vessel was not marked or certified under the requiremetn of the ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Boiler and Pressure Code, Section VIII, Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, Division 1. For example: a) The pressre vessel as not constructed in accordance with the rules of Division 1, as required under paragraph U-1(f) of that code; b) The user did not establish specific design requirements for the pressure vessel, taking into consideration factors associated with normal operation, etc., as required under paragraph U-2(a) of that code; c) The pressure vessel did not pass a prescribed hydrostatic test, equal to at least 1 1/2 times the maximum allowable working pressure, as required under paragraph UG-99 of the code; d) The pressure vessel was not provided with the marking required by paragraph UG-116, which includes: 1) The official code symbol; 2) The manufacturer's name 3) The maximum allowable working pressure; 4) The manufacturer's serial number; and 5) The year of manufacture; e) The pressure vessel was not provided with protection devices, safety and relief valves or rupture discs, as required under paragraph UG-125(a) of the code; and f) The pressure indicating gage was not graudated to approximately double the operating pressure, as required under paragraph UG-125(f) of the code. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct these hazards is to assure that the design, manufacture, certification, and use of all pressure vessels is in accordance with the most current ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
More inspections at Journal Sentinel INC.
View Journal Sentinel INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 103315297.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.