Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOURNAL SENTINEL INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JOURNAL SENTINEL INC. in 1801 DOLPHIN DRIVE, WAUKESHA, WI 53186 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103315297.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Journal Sentinel INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Journal Sentinel INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1801 DOLPHIN DRIVE
City
WAUKESHA
State
WI
ZIP
53186
Mailing
P.O. BOX 661, MILWAUKEE, WI 53201
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2711
Employees
2930
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 1989
Abate by
Apr 29, 1989
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
The hazards of bursting or failing components caused by an unapproved
pressure vessel on February 16,1989, at the old firs unit off press
#3, in the west press room. The pressure vessel was not marked or
certified under the requiremetn of the ASME (American Society of
Mechanical Engineers) Boiler and Pressure Code, Section VIII, Rules
for Construction of Pressure Vessels, Division 1. For example:
a) The pressre vessel as not constructed in accordance with the rules
of Division 1, as required under paragraph U-1(f) of that code;
b) The user did not establish specific design requirements for the
pressure vessel, taking into consideration factors associated with
normal operation, etc., as required under paragraph U-2(a) of that
code;
c) The pressure vessel did not pass a prescribed hydrostatic test, equal
to at least 1 1/2 times the maximum allowable working pressure, as
required under paragraph UG-99 of the code;
d) The pressure vessel was not provided with the marking required by
paragraph UG-116, which includes:
1) The official code symbol;
2) The manufacturer's name
3) The maximum allowable working pressure;
4) The manufacturer's serial number; and
5) The year of manufacture;
e) The pressure vessel was not provided with protection devices, safety
and relief valves or rupture discs, as required under paragraph
UG-125(a) of the code; and
f) The pressure indicating gage was not graudated to approximately
double the operating pressure, as required under paragraph UG-125(f)
of the code.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct these
hazards is to assure that the design, manufacture, certification, and
use of all pressure vessels is in accordance with the most current ASME
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

View Journal Sentinel INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 103315297.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.