FORT WORTH, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: FT. WORTH OSTEOPATHIC HOSP. DBA OSTEO. MED. CTR.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FT. WORTH OSTEOPATHIC HOSP. DBA OSTEO. MED. CTR. in 1000 MONTOMERY ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76107 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103367777.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FT. WORTH OSTEOPATHIC HOSP. DBA OSTEO. MED. CTR.
- Site address
- 1000 MONTOMERY ST.
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8062
- Employees
- 800
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 2, 1991
- Abate by
- May 13, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,875
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: Employees in the hospital were exposed to the hazard of being infected by HBV/HIV through possible direct contact with blood or other bodily fluids. Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing this hazard, among others, are: a. Revising follow-up procedures for implementation after possible exposure to HBV/HIV of workers that includes testing of the source patient for HBV/HIV (after obtaining proper consent). b. Training of nurses on proper removal of needles from arterial blood gas syringes. The employer is not limited to abatement methods suggested by OSHA, i.e., methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. Other methods of abatement may be equally or more appropriate. Ultimate responsibility for determining the most appropriate abatement method rests with the employer, given its superior knowledge of the specific conditions on its worksite. The violation(s) described in this citation are alleged to have occurred on or about the day(s) the inspection was made unless otherwise indicated within the description given below each violation.
1910.141 A04 I
- Issued
- May 2, 1991
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,875
1910.141 A04 II
- Issued
- May 2, 1991
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,875
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- May 2, 1991
- Abate by
- May 13, 1991
1904.2 A
- Issued
- May 2, 1991
- Abate by
- May 20, 1991
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 103367777.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.