GRAND PRAIRIE, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.
Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC. in STATE HIGHWAY 360 & AVE K, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75050 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103375663.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.
- Site address
- STATE HIGHWAY 360 & AVE K
- City
- GRAND PRAIRIE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75050
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 482, FORT WORTH, TX 76101
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3721
- Employees
- 4000
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 24, 1992
- Abate by
- May 13, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to enter confined spaces without propr precautions taken to ensure their safety: Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing this haard, among others, are: a. Conduct a survey of the premises to identify confined spaces. Identify hazards for each confined space, including the past and present uses of the space and changing conditions which may adversely affect the atmosphere of the space. b. Before each entry into a confined space, complete an entry permit and communicate the contents of the permit to the occupants or post the permit. c. Ensure that ventilation is maintained in order to prevent the accumulation of toxic or other contaminants during occupancy of the confined space. d. Establish measures to prevent unauthorized employee entry such as, but not limited to, posting signs and employee training. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE 29 CFR 1910.134(b)(8): Appropriate survillanceofworkareaconditions and degree of employee exposure or stress was not maintained: a. Unprotected maintenance employees entering the etch line plating tank pit in department 65 for such purposes as repair, replace- ment or maintenance of the sump pumps were exposed to uncharacterized atmospheres of sulfuric acid and/or other contaminants which were present from the leaking overhead sulfuric acid tanks. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE 29 CFR 1910.134(a)(1): When effective engineering controls were not feasible or while they were being instituted, appropriate respirators were not used pursuant to the requirements of this section: a. Unprotected maintenance employees entering the etch line plating tank pit in department 65 for such purposes as repair, replace- ment or maintenance of the sump pumps were exposed to uncharacterized atmospheres of sulfuric acid and/or other contaminants which were present from the leaking overhead sulfuric acid tanks. The employer is not limited to abatement methods suggested by OSHA, i.e., methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. Other methods of abatement may be equally or more appropriate. Ultimate responsibility for determining the most appropriate abate- ment method rests with the employer, given its superior knowledge of the specific conditions on its worksite. The violation(s) described in this citation are alleged to have occurred on or about the day(s) the inspection was made unless other- wise indicated within the description given below each violation.
Recent events (2)
- · J (S) $5000.00
- · Z (S) $5000.00
1910.334 A04
- Issued
- Apr 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
Recent events (2)
- · J (S) $5000.00
- · Z (S) $5000.00
1910.1200 H02 III
- Issued
- Apr 24, 1992
- Abate by
- May 13, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
Recent events (2)
- · J (S) $5000.00
- · Z (S) $5000.00
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Apr 24, 1992
- Abate by
- May 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
- · J (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.334 A04
- Issued
- Apr 24, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
More inspections at Bell Helicopter Textron INC.
View Bell Helicopter Textron INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 103375663.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.