Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.

Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC. in STATE HIGHWAY 360 & AVE K, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75050 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103375663.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bell Helicopter Textron INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bell Helicopter Textron INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
STATE HIGHWAY 360 & AVE K
City
GRAND PRAIRIE
State
TX
ZIP
75050
Mailing
P. O. BOX 482, FORT WORTH, TX 76101
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (Y)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3721
Employees
4000
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 1992
Abate by
May 13, 1992
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
required to enter confined spaces without propr precautions taken
to ensure their safety:
Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing this haard, among
others, are:
a.   Conduct a survey of the premises to identify confined spaces.
Identify hazards for each confined space, including the past and
present uses of the space and changing conditions which may adversely
affect the atmosphere of the space.
b.   Before each entry into a confined space, complete an entry
permit and communicate the contents of the permit to the occupants or
post the permit.
c.   Ensure that ventilation is maintained in order to prevent
the accumulation of toxic or other contaminants during occupancy of
the confined space.
d.   Establish measures to prevent unauthorized employee entry
such as, but not limited to, posting signs and employee training.
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE
29 CFR 1910.134(b)(8):  Appropriate survillanceofworkareaconditions
and degree of employee exposure or stress was not maintained:
a.   Unprotected maintenance employees entering the etch line
plating tank pit in department 65 for such purposes as repair, replace-
ment or maintenance of the sump pumps were exposed to uncharacterized
atmospheres of sulfuric acid and/or other contaminants which were
present from the leaking overhead sulfuric acid tanks.
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(1):   When effective engineering controls were not
feasible or while they were being instituted, appropriate respirators
were not used pursuant to the requirements of this section:
a.   Unprotected maintenance employees entering the etch line
plating tank pit in department 65 for such purposes as repair, replace-
ment or maintenance of the sump pumps were exposed to uncharacterized
atmospheres of sulfuric acid and/or other contaminants which were
present from the leaking overhead sulfuric acid tanks.
The employer is not limited to abatement methods suggested by OSHA,
i.e., methods explained are general and may not be effective in all
cases.  Other methods of abatement may be equally or more appropriate.
Ultimate responsibility for determining the most appropriate abate-
ment method rests with  the employer, given its superior knowledge of
the specific conditions on its worksite.
The violation(s) described in this citation are alleged to have
occurred on or about the day(s) the inspection was made unless other-
wise indicated within the description given below each violation.
Recent events (2)
  • · J (S) $5000.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.334 A04

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 1992
Abate by
Apr 29, 1992
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
Recent events (2)
  • · J (S) $5000.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.1200 H02 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 1992
Abate by
May 13, 1992
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
Recent events (2)
  • · J (S) $5000.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.24 H

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 1992
Abate by
May 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
  • · J (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.334 A04

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 1992
Abate by
Apr 29, 1992
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000

View Bell Helicopter Textron INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 103375663.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.