EVENDALE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. - AIRCRAFT ENGINE GROUP
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. - AIRCRAFT ENGINE GROUP in 1 NEUMAN WAY, EVENDALE, OH 45215 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 103376547.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. - AIRCRAFT ENGINE GROUP
- Site address
- 1 NEUMAN WAY
- City
- EVENDALE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45215
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 156301 N123, EVENDALE, OH 45215
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3724
- Employees
- 1600
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 11, 1992
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) Assemblers in the Building 500 development assembly area were exposed to the potential hazard of being struck by falling loads while working beneath jet engines suspended from the dual rail Westmont system in that there was no cribbing or equivalent protection used to support the load in the event of a failure of the system's suspension components. Some feasible and acceptable methods, among others, to correct this hazard would be to prohibit employees from working beneath the suspended loads, or to crib, block or otherwise support the load so that a failure of the overhead support components would not result in dropping the load. (b) Inspectors in area V6 of the Building 800 basement were exposed to the potential hazard of being struck by falling loads while working under compressors suspended from 1/2 ton hoists on occasions including but not limited to the afternoon of May 14, 1992. Some feasible and acceptable methods, among others, to correct this hazard would be to prohibit employees from working beneath suspended loads, or to crib block or otherwise support the load so that a failure of the hoist or lifting components would not result in dropping the load.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.305 E01
- Issued
- Aug 11, 1992
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $2125.00
1910.22 B01
- Issued
- Aug 11, 1992
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at General Electric CO. - Aircraft Engine Group
View General Electric CO. - Aircraft Engine Group's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 103376547.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.