FORT LAUDERDALE, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: J.M. BEESON COMPANY
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of J.M. BEESON COMPANY in 2400 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33305 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106104698.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J.M. BEESON COMPANY
- Site address
- 2400 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY
- City
- FORT LAUDERDALE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33305
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1542
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 29, 1988
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 1988
- Penalty
- Initial $810 · Current $810
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a) On and before May 11, 1988, at the Capital Bank Plaza Project, employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of being struck by or crushed while erecting concrete tilt slab panels adjacent to previously erected panels which were not anchored and braced properly. Particular concerns include the following hazards: 1) The minimum allowable skew angle of 5 degrees with braces set perpendicular (90 degrees) to a panel was exceeded. 2) Expansion bolts were used to anchor the braces to the panels: Wall brace inserts are required. 3) With panels of a cantilevered configuration the stiff leg supporting the over hand was attached to the panel with expansion bolts: Wall brace inserts are required. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to abate these hazards is to follow the recommendations and requirements as provided by the bracing material manufacturer and supplier; as found in Burke Catalog No. 870 and to follow the blue print requirements (Print and Page No. PN-17; as furnished to the site).
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 29, 1988
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 1988
- Penalty
- Initial $720 · Current $720
1926.152 A01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 1988
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 1988
1926.500 E01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 1988
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 1988
1926.602 B01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 1988
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 1988
More inspections at J.M. Beeson Company
View J.M. Beeson Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 106104698.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.