Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: OKO CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of OKO CORPORATION in 980 LUNT, ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL 60007 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106143969.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch OKO Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for OKO Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
OKO CORPORATION
Site address
980 LUNT
City
ELK GROVE VILLAGE
State
IL
ZIP
60007
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3471
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 06 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 1989
Abate by
Dec 24, 1989
Penalty
Initial $240 · Current $170 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were ex-
posed to:
(a) Employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of oxygen deficiency
and toxic atmosphere(s) while performing clean up operations in
a 6 foot deep tank containing sulphuric acid and caustic soda.
The employer had not developed and implemented an effective con-
fined space entry program to protect employees from these haz-
ards.
One feasible method among others to correct the hazard would be
to develop a confined area entry procedure incorporating the
following elements:
(1) Written procedure covering a permit system, ventilation,
atmospheric testing, rescue procedures, lockout proce-
dures and employee training. Conduct periodic evalua-
tion of the effectiveness of the procedures.
(2) The completion and posting of a confined space entry
permit which requires authorization and approval in
writing that specifies the location and type of work to
be done and certifies that all existing and potential
hazards have been evaluated by a qualified person and
necessary protective measures have been taken to ensure
the safety of each worker.
(3) Mechanical ventilation of the confined space prior to
entry and continued ventilation to provide a safe atmos-
phere where determined necessary as defined in (2)
above.
(4) Testing the atmosphere of the confined space prior to
entry and on a regular basis for presence of sufficient
oxygen (15.5%) and absence of hazardous levels of toxic
of combustible gases or vapors when determined necessary
as described in (2) above.
(5) Lockout, blocking, stooping and reducing machines to
zero mechanical and thermal state of all mechanical,
electrical, liquid relating to the confined space that
may create a hazard during entry should these systems be
put in motion or otherwise activated. A worker individ-
ual lock is to be applied and a unique and situation tag
shall be attached to the lock and energizing controls.
(6) Emergency rescue procedures, with a requirement that
trained personnel are available and are stationed out-
side the confined space with proper equipment to provide
for the rescue of persons entering the space as deter-
mined necessary as described in (2) above. Such equip-
ment must include safety harness and life lines with
provisions for hoisting employees from the confined
space. If entry is required for a rescue, the rescuing
employee must be equipped with approved air supplied
respiratory equipment and other appropriate personnel
protective equipment.
(7) Training of any and all employees required to enter the
confined space. This training shall include procedures
required prior to entry and the hazards associated with
work in confined spaces.
(8) Periodic review of the procedure(s) with employees and
evaluation of its effectiveness.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $170.00
  • · Z (S) $240.00

1910.38 A01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 1989
Abate by
Dec 24, 1989
Penalty
Initial $120 · Current $80 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $80.00
  • · Z (S) $120.00

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 1989
Abate by
Nov 24, 1989
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 1989
Abate by
Nov 24, 1989
Penalty
Initial $200 · Current $140 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $140.00
  • · Z (S) $200.00

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 1989
Abate by
Nov 24, 1989
Penalty
Initial $120 · Current $80 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $80.00
  • · Z (S) $120.00

View OKO Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 106143969.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.