ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: OKO CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of OKO CORPORATION in 980 LUNT, ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL 60007 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106143969.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OKO CORPORATION
- Site address
- 980 LUNT
- City
- ELK GROVE VILLAGE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60007
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3471
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Dec 24, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $240 · Current $170 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were ex- posed to: (a) Employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of oxygen deficiency and toxic atmosphere(s) while performing clean up operations in a 6 foot deep tank containing sulphuric acid and caustic soda. The employer had not developed and implemented an effective con- fined space entry program to protect employees from these haz- ards. One feasible method among others to correct the hazard would be to develop a confined area entry procedure incorporating the following elements: (1) Written procedure covering a permit system, ventilation, atmospheric testing, rescue procedures, lockout proce- dures and employee training. Conduct periodic evalua- tion of the effectiveness of the procedures. (2) The completion and posting of a confined space entry permit which requires authorization and approval in writing that specifies the location and type of work to be done and certifies that all existing and potential hazards have been evaluated by a qualified person and necessary protective measures have been taken to ensure the safety of each worker. (3) Mechanical ventilation of the confined space prior to entry and continued ventilation to provide a safe atmos- phere where determined necessary as defined in (2) above. (4) Testing the atmosphere of the confined space prior to entry and on a regular basis for presence of sufficient oxygen (15.5%) and absence of hazardous levels of toxic of combustible gases or vapors when determined necessary as described in (2) above. (5) Lockout, blocking, stooping and reducing machines to zero mechanical and thermal state of all mechanical, electrical, liquid relating to the confined space that may create a hazard during entry should these systems be put in motion or otherwise activated. A worker individ- ual lock is to be applied and a unique and situation tag shall be attached to the lock and energizing controls. (6) Emergency rescue procedures, with a requirement that trained personnel are available and are stationed out- side the confined space with proper equipment to provide for the rescue of persons entering the space as deter- mined necessary as described in (2) above. Such equip- ment must include safety harness and life lines with provisions for hoisting employees from the confined space. If entry is required for a rescue, the rescuing employee must be equipped with approved air supplied respiratory equipment and other appropriate personnel protective equipment. (7) Training of any and all employees required to enter the confined space. This training shall include procedures required prior to entry and the hazards associated with work in confined spaces. (8) Periodic review of the procedure(s) with employees and evaluation of its effectiveness.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $170.00
- · Z (S) $240.00
1910.38 A01
- Issued
- Oct 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Dec 24, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $120 · Current $80 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $80.00
- · Z (S) $120.00
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Oct 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 24, 1989
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Oct 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 24, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $200 · Current $140 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $140.00
- · Z (S) $200.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 20, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 24, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $120 · Current $80 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $80.00
- · Z (S) $120.00
More inspections at OKO Corporation
View OKO Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 106143969.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.