TALOFOFO, GU ·
OSHA Inspection: BUNGY JUMP INTL., INC. DBA: GUAM BUNGY JUMP CENTER
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of BUNGY JUMP INTL., INC. DBA: GUAM BUNGY JUMP CENTER in TALOFOFO RIVER, TALOFOFO, GU 96930 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106189772.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BUNGY JUMP INTL., INC. DBA: GUAM BUNGY JUMP CENTER
- Site address
- TALOFOFO RIVER
- City
- TALOFOFO
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96930
- Mailing
- 359 "C" MARINE DRIVE, SUITE NO. 4, TAMUNING, GU 96911
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7999
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 24, 1995
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that periodic inspections of a hammerhead tower crane's hoist rope were not performed where: the inspection covered the entire length of the rope, any deterioration resulting in appreciable loss of original strength was noted, and a determination made as to whether further use of the rope would constitute a hazard: a)Bungy Jump Site - Inspections of the hoist rope were not performed on a Raimondi hammerhead tower crane, model number ER 135, serial number TK 5515-8, where: the inspection covered the entire length of the rope, any deterioration resulting in appreciable loss of original strength was noted, and a determination made as to whether further use of the rope would constitute a hazard, exposing employees riding on the personnel platform to assist bungy jump customers, to the hazard of falling from an elevation of about 190 feet to the river below. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform periodic inspections of a hammerhead crane's hoist rope where: the inspection covers the entire length of the rope, any deterioration resulting in appreciable loss of original strength is noted, and a determination is made as to whether further use of the rope would constitute a hazard as delineated in the American National Standards Institute/American Society of Mechanical Engineers standard for Hammerhead Tower Cranes B 30.3, Section 3-2.4.2(b)(2) Inspection.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1500.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 24, 1995
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $42,000 · Current $42,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a hammerhead tower crane that was not provided with a braking means with holding power in both directions to prevent movement of the rotating upper structure during operation, and not capable of being set in the holding position and remaining so without further action on the part of the operator: a)Bungy Jump Site - A braking means with holding power in both directions to prevent movement of the rotating upper structure during operation, and capable of being set in the holding position and remaining so without further action on the part of the operator was not provided to prevent movement of rotating upper structure (Jib) of the Raimondi hammerhead tower crane, model number ER 135, serial number TK 5515-8, exposing employees, working next to the personnel platform being moved and lifted by the crane, to the hazard of being struck by the platform. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide a braking means with holding power in both directions to prevent movement of the rotating upper structure during operation, and capable of being set in the holding position and remaining so without further action on the part of the operator as delineated in the American National Standards Institute/American Society of Mechanical Engineers standard for Hammerhead Tower Cranes B 30.3, Section 3-1.6.2 Slewing Brakes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $42000.00
- · Z (W) $42000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 24, 1995
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $42,000 · Current $42,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a hammerhead tower crane that did not have warning or limiting devices installed to prevent two blocking, the condition when the lower hook assembly comes in contact with the upper hook assembly or trolley: a)Bungy Jump Site - Warning or limiting devices to prevent two blocking were not installed on the Raimondi hammerhead tower crane, model number ER 135, serial number TK 5515-8, exposing employees riding on the personnel platform to assist bungy jump customers, to the hazard of falling from an elevation of about 190 feet to the river below. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to install warning or limiting devices to prevent two blocking as delineated in the American National Standards Institute/American Society of Mechanical Engineers standard for Hammerhead Tower Cranes B 30.3, Section 3-3.2.2(a)(8) Personnel Lifting.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $42000.00
- · Z (W) $42000.00
1910.27 D02
- Issued
- Mar 24, 1995
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $42,000 · Current $42,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $42000.00
- · Z (W) $42000.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 106189772.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.