COLUMBIANA, AL —
OSHA Inspection: BUCK CREEK INDUSTRIES- - VALLEY DIVISION, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BUCK CREEK INDUSTRIES- - VALLEY DIVISION, INC. in MILL STREET, COLUMBIANA, AL 35051 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106235914.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BUCK CREEK INDUSTRIES- - VALLEY DIVISION, INC.
- Site address
- MILL STREET
- City
- COLUMBIANA
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35051
- Mailing
- P. O.BOX 918, COLUMBIANA, AL 35051
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2281
- Employees
- 194
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to an unacceptable risk of musculoskeletal injuries and cumulative trauma disorders, while performing various material handling tasks and repetitive motions and an effective ergonomics program had not been implemented: a) Twisting Department b) Spinning Department c) Suessen Department d) Blending Department While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include, but are not limited to, the development and implementation of an ergonomics program which would include at least the following elements: 1) Worksite Analysis-Identify existing ergonomic hazard and work positions that put employees at risk of developing cumulative trauma disorders (CTD's) and musculoskeletal injuries. 2) Hazard Prevention and Control-Use appropriate engineering control, work practice controls, personal protective equipment and administrative controls to correct or control the ergonomic hazards identified. 3) Medical Management-Ensure the early identification, evaluation, and treatment of signs and symptons, and to aid in the prevention of CTD's musculoskeletal injuries. 4) Training and Education-Ensure that all employees, supervisors, engineers, managers and health care providers are sufficiently informed about ergonomic hazards to which employees may be exposed, and the means to reduce or eliminate the exposures. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE: Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the ergonomics program to control employee exposure to the hazardous conditions referenced in this citation. This plan shall be submitted within the first forty-five (45) days of the abatement period. Thereafter, sixty day (60) progress reports shall be submitted to the Area Director.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $250.00
- — Z (S) $490.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to an unacceptable risk of musculoskeletal injuries and cumulative trauma disorders, while performing various material handling tasks and repetitive motions, and administrative and engineering controls had not been implemented: a) Twisting Department b) Spinning Department c) Suessen Department d) Blending Department While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include, but are not limited to, the implementation of the following: 1) Control measures to reduce the frequency of repetitive motions performed by employees; 2) Control measures to provide rest pauses to relieve fatiqued muscle-tendon groups; 3) Control measures to rotate employees between high and low stressor jobs as a preventative measure; 4) Control measures to ensure the use of good body mechanics and proper lfiting techniques; 5) Control measures to increase the number of employees assigned to certain lifting tasks. 6) Control measures to ensure that new and returning employees are allowed conditioning or break-in periods; 7) Control measures to ensure that all equipment is in proper working condition; 8) Control measures to reduce extreme and awkward postures; 9) Control measures to reduce excessive force exerted by employees; 10) Control measures for designing work stations that can be easily adjustable to accommodate the employees; 11) Control measures to provide mechanical lifting aids; 12) Control measures to provide ergonomically-designed hand tools. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE: Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative and engineering controls to control employee exposure to the hazardous conditions referenced in this citation. This plan shall be submitted within the first forty-five (45) days of the abatement period. Thereafter, sixty (60) day progress reports shall be submitted to the Area Director.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $250.00
- — Z (S) $490.00
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $810 · Current $425 Reduced
8111
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $425.00
- — I (S) $425.00
- — Z (S) $810.00
1910.95 G08 IIC
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $810 · Current $450 Reduced
8110
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $450.00
- — Z (S) $810.00
1910.95 I02 IIB
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $640 · Current $350 Reduced
8110
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $640.00
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $250 Reduced
8110
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $250.00
- — Z (S) $420.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 1991
1910.20 G02
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 1991
8111
1910.95 M02 IIA
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 1991
8111
1910.95 M02 IIE
- Issued
- Jan 8, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 1991
More inspections at Buck Creek Industries- - Valley Division, INC.
View Buck Creek Industries- - Valley Division, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 106235914.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.