Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BUCK CREEK INDUSTRIES- - VALLEY DIVISION, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BUCK CREEK INDUSTRIES- - VALLEY DIVISION, INC. in MILL STREET, COLUMBIANA, AL 35051 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106235914.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Buck Creek Industries- - Valley Division, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Buck Creek Industries- - Valley Division, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
MILL STREET
City
COLUMBIANA
State
AL
ZIP
35051
Mailing
P. O.BOX 918, COLUMBIANA, AL 35051
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2281
Employees
194
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 07 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Jul 11, 1991
Penalty
Initial $490 · Current $250 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
an unacceptable risk of musculoskeletal injuries and cumulative trauma
disorders, while performing various material handling tasks and
repetitive motions and an effective ergonomics program had not been
implemented:
a) Twisting Department
b) Spinning Department
c) Suessen Department
d) Blending Department
While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the
employer, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this
hazard include, but are not limited to, the development and
implementation of an ergonomics program which would include at least the
following elements:
1) Worksite Analysis-Identify existing ergonomic hazard and work
positions that put employees at risk of developing cumulative
trauma disorders (CTD's) and musculoskeletal injuries.
2) Hazard Prevention and Control-Use appropriate engineering control,
work practice controls, personal protective equipment and
administrative controls to correct or control the ergonomic
hazards identified.
3) Medical Management-Ensure the early identification, evaluation, and
treatment of signs and symptons, and to aid in the prevention of
CTD's musculoskeletal injuries.
4) Training and Education-Ensure that all employees, supervisors,
engineers, managers and health care providers are sufficiently
informed about ergonomic hazards to which employees may be exposed,
and the means to reduce or eliminate the exposures.
ABATEMENT SCHEDULE:
Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement
outlining a schedule for the implementation of the ergonomics program
to control employee exposure to the hazardous conditions referenced in
this citation. This plan shall be submitted within the first forty-five
(45) days of the abatement period. Thereafter, sixty day (60) progress
reports shall be submitted to the Area Director.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $250.00
  • — Z (S) $490.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 07 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Jan 10, 1992
Penalty
Initial $490 · Current $250 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
an unacceptable risk of musculoskeletal injuries and cumulative trauma
disorders, while performing various material handling tasks and
repetitive motions, and administrative and engineering controls had not
been implemented:
a) Twisting Department
b) Spinning Department
c) Suessen Department
d) Blending Department
While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with
the employer, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct
this hazard include, but are not limited to, the implementation of
the following:
1) Control measures to reduce the frequency of repetitive motions
performed by employees;
2) Control measures to provide rest pauses to relieve fatiqued
muscle-tendon groups;
3) Control measures to rotate employees between high and low
stressor jobs as a preventative measure;
4) Control measures to ensure the use of good body mechanics and
proper lfiting techniques;
5) Control measures to increase the number of employees assigned
to certain lifting tasks.
6) Control measures to ensure that new and returning employees are
allowed conditioning or break-in periods;
7) Control measures to ensure that all equipment is in proper working
condition;
8) Control measures to reduce extreme and awkward postures;
9) Control measures to reduce excessive force exerted by employees;
10) Control measures for designing work stations that can be easily
adjustable to accommodate the employees;
11) Control measures to provide mechanical lifting aids;
12) Control measures to provide ergonomically-designed hand tools.
ABATEMENT SCHEDULE:
Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement
outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative and
engineering controls to control employee exposure to the hazardous
conditions referenced in this citation. This plan shall be submitted
within the first forty-five (45) days of the abatement period.
Thereafter, sixty (60) day progress reports shall be submitted to the
Area Director.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $250.00
  • — Z (S) $490.00

1910.95 B01

Serious Gravity 09 2 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Dec 31, 1991
Penalty
Initial $810 · Current $425 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $425.00
  • — I (S) $425.00
  • — Z (S) $810.00

1910.95 G08 IIC

Serious Gravity 09 51 instances 51 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Jun 4, 1991
Penalty
Initial $810 · Current $450 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8110

Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $450.00
  • — Z (S) $810.00

1910.95 I02 IIB

Serious Gravity 08 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Feb 11, 1991
Penalty
Initial $640 · Current $350 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8110

Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $350.00
  • — Z (S) $640.00

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 07 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Feb 11, 1991
Penalty
Initial $420 · Current $250 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8110

Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $250.00
  • — Z (S) $420.00

1904.2 A

Other-than-serious 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Feb 11, 1991

1910.20 G02

Other-than-serious 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Feb 11, 1991

Hazardous substances 8111

1910.95 M02 IIA

Other-than-serious 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Feb 11, 1991

Hazardous substances 8111

1910.95 M02 IIE

Other-than-serious 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 1991
Abate by
Feb 11, 1991

View Buck Creek Industries- - Valley Division, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 106235914.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.