Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FARR COMPANY INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FARR COMPANY INC. in 103 ROTARY DRIVE, VALMONT IND. PARK, WEST HAZLETON, PA 18201 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106465248.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Farr Company INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Farr Company INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FARR COMPANY INC.
Site address
103 ROTARY DRIVE, VALMONT IND. PARK
City
WEST HAZLETON
State
PA
ZIP
18201
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3569
Employees
35
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Aug 7, 1995
Penalty
Initial $2,625 · Current $1,575 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to
cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees
were required to perform tasks involving repetitive motions
resulting in stresses that had caused, were causing, or were likely
to cause cumulative trauma disorders:
Assemblers and Mid-assemblers - The evaluation of this tasks
indicates that employees were exposed to a hazard which is
causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders.  The
employer did not implement an effective control strategy to
reduce or eliminate such disorders.  The injury and illness
records for 1991, 1992 and 1993 documented a pattern of
repetitive motion injuries.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct this hazard is the
implementation of an ergonomics management program
consisting of the following four elements.
(1)  Worksite analysis to recognize and identify
existing manual lifting hazards in the workplace.  This
analysis should include development and use of an
ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire.
Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at
least annually to evaluate work practices and
engineering controls.  Employee participation in the
ergonomic program should be encouraged through a
mechanism such as a safety committee.
(2)  Medical management which includes accurate
recordkeeping of manual lifting injuries.  The program
should address recognition, evaluation, treatment and
referral of lifting cases.  Systematic worksite review
by the medical team should also be included in the
program.
(3)  Training and education for exposed employees,
including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the
training. Re-training should be done annually, or as
operations change. Training should address hazards
associated with the job, the risks of manual material
handling, and how to prevent lifting injuries.  A
supervisor's training program should also be
implemented to allow recognition of manual lifting
hazards, and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic
program.
(4)  Hazard prevention and control which includes
engineering, work practices and administrative
controls:
(a)  Administrative controls are implemented whichreduce the duration,
frequency, and severity of
exposure to manual lifting    hazards.  These
controls may include job rotation, reduction of
repetitions, multiple person lifts, and
preventative maintenance   of related equipment.
(b)  Work practice controls are implemented which
include proper work techniques, new employee
conditioning, proper placement of loads, and
reduction of weight lifted.
Examples of work practice controls applicable
to this workplace include:
(i)Utilize proper work techniques
(ii)Employee rotation
(iii)Employee training and
conditioning
(c)  Engineering controls are designed by a qualified
ergonomist and may include work station redesign, tool
and handle redesign,  and use of mechanical lifting
aids.  The goal of this program should be to make the
job fit the person.
Examples of engineering controls applicable
in this workplace include:
(i)Utilize adjustable height and tilt
work stations.
(ii)Cut product to the smallest size
possible to provide for easier assembly.
(iii)Utilize light weight plastic
assembly pans.
(iv)Purchase and use a glue gun which has a
smaller hand grasp.
(v)Utilize an automatic frame folding
machine.
ABATEMENT SCHEDULE
Step 1 - Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite
analysis, medical management, and training and education, as
detailed in items 1-3, above.
Step 2 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of
abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the
administrative, work practice and engineering controls as
detailed in items 4(a) - 4(c).
ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH
PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE
CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS.  SIXTY (60) DAY
PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD.
Step 3 - Implementation of administrative, work practice and
engineering controls as described in items 4(a) - 4(c), above.
Recent events (5)
  • — I (S) $1575.00
  • — Z $1000.00
  • — A (S) $1575.00

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 01 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Nov 27, 1993
Penalty
Initial $1,125 · Current $675 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $675.00
  • — Z (S) $1125.00

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Nov 27, 1993
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Oct 28, 1993
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 01 3 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Nov 27, 1993
Penalty
Initial $1,125 · Current $675 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $675.00
  • — Z (S) $1125.00

1910.305 G01 III

Serious Gravity 02 5 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Nov 27, 1993
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.1200 H02 II

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Nov 12, 1993
Penalty
Initial $1,125 · Current $675 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $675.00
  • — Z (S) $1125.00

1910.22 B01

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Nov 12, 1993

1910.132 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 03 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Nov 27, 1993
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $450 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $450.00
  • — Z (O) $750.00

1910.157 G02

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Nov 27, 1993

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 1993
Abate by
Nov 12, 1993

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 106465248.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.