Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: MACK PRINTING GROUP

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MACK PRINTING GROUP in 34 N CRYSTAL ST, EAST STROUDSBURG, PA 18301 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106474604.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mack Printing Group for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mack Printing Group is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MACK PRINTING GROUP
Site address
34 N CRYSTAL ST
City
EAST STROUDSBURG
State
PA
ZIP
18301
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (Y)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2732
Employees
254
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

12 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Nov 1, 1998
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,250 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act:  The employer
did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees
were required to perform tasks involving repetitive motions resulting in
stresses that had
caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders:
a)  Inserter lines - Employees were suffering upper extremity and back
repetitive
motion injuries while performing tasks including bending to floor level to
retrieve
inserts form baskets, twisting, jogging and fanning inserts.  The employer
did not
implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such
disorders.  The
injury and illness records for 1995 and 1996 documented a pattern of
repetitive
motion injuries.
b)  Perfect Binder - Employees were suffering upper extremity and back
repetitive
motion injuries while performing tasks including bending to floor level to
retrieve
inserts form baskets, twisting, jogging and fanning inserts.  The employer
did not
implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such
disorders.  The
injury and illness records for 1995 and 1996 documented a pattern of
repetitive
motion injuries.
c)  Stagers and Skid Stackers - Employees were suffering upper extremity
and back
repetitive motion injuries while performing tasks including bending to
floor level to
place magazines into baskets, twisting, and scooping magazines into piles
which are
held in a pinch grip.  The employer did not implement an effective control
strategy to
reduce or eliminate such disorders.  The injury and illness records for
1995 and 1996
documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this
hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program
consisting of the
following four elements.
(1)  Worksite analysis to recognize and identify  existing cumulative
trauma disorders
in the workplace.  This analysis should include development and use of an
ergonomic
checklist and employee questionnaire.  Periodic surveys of the worksite
shall be
conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering
controls.
Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged.
(2)  Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of CTDs.  The
program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of CTD
cases,  and
should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work.
Systematic
worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program.
(3)  Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to
evaluate the
effectiveness of the training.  Re-training should be done annually, or as
operations
change.  Training should address hazards associated with the job, the
risks of
developing CTDs, symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence
ofCTD.  A supervisor's training program should also be implemented to allow
recognition of the signs of CTDs and to reinforce the employer's  ergonomic
program.
(4)  Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work
practices and
administrative controls, and personal protective equipment where relevant.
(a)  Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration,
frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress.  These controls
may
include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventative
maintenance of
related equipment.  Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to
determine any contribution to ergonomic stress.
(b)  Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work
techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as
necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors.
Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include:
(i)  Train employees to perform jogging and fanning when needed
instead of performing them several times for one pile.
(ii) Train employees to grasp piles of comfortable size.
(c)  Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may
include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change or work
methods. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person.
Examples of engineering controls applicable in this workplace include:
(i)  Utilize automatic pocket feeders
(ii) Use equipment which mechanically jogs and fans the piles
(iii) Utilize a load leveler with a rotating top to create and even
transfer
from the pallet to the staging area.
(iv)  Alter conveyors to be height available
(v)  Utilize scissor lifts to reduce low level bending
(vi) Position a stacker (light activated) mechanism at the staging areas
to accumulate desired stacks of magazines which then can be bound
without employee manipulation.
(vii) Implement the recommendations outlined in the Liberty
Mutualergonomics report.
ABATEMENT SCHEDULE
Step 1 - Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis,
medical
management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3, above.
Step 2 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement
outlining a
schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and
engineering
controls as detailed in items 4(a) - 4(c).
ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH
PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF
WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA
DISORDERS.  SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED
DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD.
Step 3 - Implementation of administrative, work practice and engineering
controls as
described in items 4(a) - 4(c), above.
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:    STEP - 1     01/24/97
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:    STEP - 2     02/08/97
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:    STEP - 3     03/10/97
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $3250.00
  • · A (S) $4500.00
  • · Z (S) $4500.00

1910.147 C04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Penalty
Initial $4,500
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S)
  • · A (S) $4500.00
  • · Z (S) $4500.00

1910.147 C06 II

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Penalty
Initial $1,125
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O)
  • · A (S) $1125.00
  • · Z (S) $1125.00

1910.178 O01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Penalty
Initial $1,875 · Current $1,440 Reduced
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1440.00
  • · A (S) $1875.00
  • · Z (S) $1875.00

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 05 4 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Penalty
Initial $2,625 · Current $1,815 Reduced
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1815.00
  • · A (S) $2625.00
  • · Z (S) $2625.00

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Penalty
Initial $1,125 · Current $565 Reduced
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $565.00
  • · A (S) $1125.00
  • · Z (S) $1125.00

1910.95 L01

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O)
  • · A (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.157 G02

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O)
  • · A (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.178 P01

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O)
  • · A (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.305 B01

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O)
  • · A (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.305 I03 IIE

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O)
  • · A (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.1020 G01

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 1997
Abate by
Jan 24, 1997
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O)
  • · A (O)
  • · Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 106474604.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.