MADISON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: SPECTRULITE CONSORTIUM, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SPECTRULITE CONSORTIUM, INC. in 1001 COLLEGE STREET, MADISON, IL 62060 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106550221.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SPECTRULITE CONSORTIUM, INC.
- Site address
- 1001 COLLEGE STREET
- City
- MADISON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3354
- Employees
- 370
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 25, 1995
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $63,000 · Current $30,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: ...the hazard of rapidly expanding steam vapor/molten metal explosion On or about November 29, 1994, and for at least the five (5) year period prior to that date, in the Magnesium Melt Room the employer did not make sure that only dry equipment was available for use when working with molten magnesium. Equipment was returned from repair and cleaning without the proper preparation to make sure that it was dry prior to being placed in the magnesium melting pots. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS ..... Provide the Magnesium Melt Crew and others in the area when equipment,scrap, and other additives are being introduced into the molten metal with remote handling equipment so that when it is necessary to introduce such materials into the molten metal this can be accomplished from a safe distance behind protective barriers. Provide the Magnesium Caster, whose job it is to stand at the casting mold and regulate the continuous casting of the magnesium, controls located behind a protective barrier. The protective barrier must have a reinforced glass window so that the Caster can observe the operation clearly as he controls the pour. Written procedures to make sure the equipment is dry and clean have not been consistently effective enough in the past to protect the employees life and safety as evidenced by numerous life-threatening spills, incidents, and explosions; however these procedures shall remain fully in effect since the potential explosions such as occurred on 11-29-95 are powerful enough to cause great destruction and injure employees out of the immediate area not protected by the barriers described above. ABATEMENT NORMALLY WILL BE MULTISTEP AS FOLLOWS: STEP 1: EFFECTIVE INTERIM PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND USED BY EXPOSED EMPLOYEES UNTIL FEASIBLE ENGINEERING CONTROLS CAN BE IMPLEMENTED. A WRITTEN PLAN DESCRIBING THE INTERIM PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE PREPARED IN DETAIL AND SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE WITHIN ONE WEEK OF RECEIPT OF THIS CITATION. STEP 2: SUBMIT TO THE AREA DIRECTOR A WRITTEN, DETAILED PLAN OF ABATEMENT OUTLINING A SCHEDULE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENGINEERING MEASURES TO CONTROL EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE TO HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AS REFERENCED IN THIS CITATION. THIS PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, TARGET DATES FOR THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS WHICH MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ABATEMENT DATES REQUIRED BY THIS CITATION: (1)EVALUATION OF ENGINEERING CONTROL OPTIONS;(2)SELECTION OF OPTIMUM CONTROL METHODS AND COMPLETION OF DESIGN; (3)PROCUREMENT, INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF SELECTED CONTROL MEASURES; AND (4)TESTING AND ACCEPTANCE OR MODIFICATION/REDESIGN OF CONTROLS NOTE:ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A COMPETENT SAFETY PROFESSIONAL OR OTHER TECHNICALLY QUALIFIED PERSON. Thirty-(30) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. STEP 3: ABATEMENT SHALL HAVE BEEN COMPLETED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FEASIBLE ENGINEERING AND/OR ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS UPON VERIFICATION OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN ACHIEVING COMPLIANCE. STEP 1 WEEK STEP 2 60 DAYS STEP 3 120 DAYS
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $30000.00
- — Z (W) $63000.00
1910.146 D05 II
- Issued
- May 25, 1995
- Abate by
- May 31, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $63,000 · Current $50,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $50000.00
- — Z (W) $63000.00
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- May 25, 1995
- Abate by
- May 30, 1995
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Spectrulite Consortium, INC.
View Spectrulite Consortium, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 106550221.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.