NEWTON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: UT AUTOMOTIVE
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of UT AUTOMOTIVE in HIGHWAY 130 AND MARSHALL DRIVE, NEWTON, IL 62448 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106556327.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UT AUTOMOTIVE
- Site address
- HIGHWAY 130 AND MARSHALL DRIVE
- City
- NEWTON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62448
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3714
- Employees
- 800
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 18, 1994
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: .....Employees working in the rotary department were exposed to excessive ergonomic stress caused by repetitive motions associated with the manufacture and assembly of automotive wiring harnesses. The repetitive motion associated with the work processes required by this manufacture and assembly caused, aggravated, or precipitated carpal tunnel syndrome, tendinitis, strains and numbness of the hands, wrist, shoulder, back and other musculoskeletal effects. The employer shall develop, document, and implement a comprehensive ergonomic program which addresses the method in which the following elements will be met: 1. Worksite Analysis (additional studies to add to and improve on the studies in #5 below as needed). 2. Hazard Prevention and Control. 3. Medical Management, include full implementation of 1991 Memo on recording cumulative Trauma Disorders on the OSHA 200 Log. 4. Training and Education. 5. Implement (insofar as feasible) fully the recommendations of the two consultant studies (The Joyce Institute and Biomechanics Corp. of America). The employer shall determine the effectiveness and implement the following if necessary: A. Proper work techniques B. Employee conditioning C. Regular monitoring D. Feedback E. Maintenance F. Adjustments and modifications G. Enforcement WORKSITE ANALYSIS 1. Use the assistance of an expert by education, training and experience in the field of ergonomics to conduct a comprehensive study of the workplace aimed at a more extensive exposition of the workplace ergonomic hazards that affect workers and that can result in static posture and repetitive motion related disease. 2. Analyze trends of injuries and illnesses from existing records such as the OSHA 200 logs, first aid logs, and related information. Identify relatedpopulations including: departments, job titles, length of employment, or other related groups and analyze trends. 3. Use a combination of worker questionnaires, as appropriate, and medical examinations to identify and establish a baseline of workers who have symptoms associated with work related muscle strain and/or cumulative trauma disorders (CTD). 4. Redesign the work stations to achieve minimum ergonomic stress to the workers. After 60 days, use worker questionnaires to establish whether further improvements are needed in engineering and administrative controls. Make further adjustments in work station and task design. After another 60 days reevaluate the revisions. HAZARD PREVENTION AND CONTROL Investigate a series of work station and work process changes that include: 1. Preferred techniques for completing assigned tasks shall be determined and documented to reduce worker stress. 2. Redesign the work stations to assure employee body positions are maintained in a manner that limits stressful forces for an assigned job. Engineering controls shall be developed to minimize or eliminate static, awkward postures, repetitive motions, and excessive force. 3. Establish a tool selection and maintenance program that is based on the following: --- Use ergonomically designed tools with handles and tool angles that maintain the wrist in a neutral position. --- The handle length of tools should be at least 4 inches long to allow the worker some freedom of hand placement on the handle. Avoid fluted or ridged handles which only fit a certain percentage of workers' hands comfortably. --- Ensure that ergonomic tools are used as intended. Pistol handled power drivers should be used on vertical surfaces. Inline handled power drivers should be used on horizontal surfaces. --- For trigger activated tools, use trigger strips that can be operated by 2 or 3 fingers, instead of trigger buttons. --- Ensure that the weight of the tools is kept low. Tools heavier than 1-2 pounds should be supported by a counter-balance. Evaluate the present counter-balance systems to ensure that the tool's center of gravity is aligned with the center of thegrasping hand. --- Establish a regular inspection schedule for power tools to ensure that they are operated at the optimum performance, for instance, check the counter-balance systems. Ensure that employees have the ability to maintain their own tools, for instance, lubrication of power tools. --- Implement preventative maintenance program and assure tools are used as intended. --- Use jigs or guides to hold parts being worked on. 4. Ensure standing drills are designed to the appropriate height to minimize the amount of stress placed on the back, shoulders, and hands. Design handles on standing drills to a comfortable size with vibration damping materials. 5. Implement the use of personal protective equipment as a preventative measure. When gloves are selected they should reduce the transmission of vibration energy to the hands and protect against exposure to cold trauma. Note braces, splints, and back belts are not considered personal protective equipment. 6. Effective housekeeping measures must be implemented to assure adequate pathways on and off the trailers. Controls shall be implemented to prevent slippery surfaces. 7. Methods shall be devised to gradually integrate new and returning employees into a full workload. Care shall be taken to assure that employees who have medical restrictions are accommodated and perform activities within the limits of those restrictions. 8. Administrative controls such as employee rotation shall be implemented where they will reduce ergonomic stressors. It is understood by OSHA that any employee rotation controls will have to be negotiated with the union. 9. The employer will identify specific alternative, light duty jobs that will be utilized to address employees with medical restrictions that do not allow them to conduct their regular assignments. 10. Regular monitoring of all aspects of the program shall be completed by the appropriate personnel. MEDICAL MANAGEMENT Establish a series of programs aimed at securing medical identification and treatment of workers' ergonomic injuries and illnesses that include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Monitor new and CTD damaged workers. Determine whether they are performing tasks using the company prescribed methods, practices and workplace configurations. Periodically review the performance with the worker, supervisor, safety and health personnel and the medical staff. 2. Encourage workers to advise company management as to repetitive motion disorder symptoms they experience, as soon as possible, so medical intervention can take place. 3. In coordination with the injured worker's doctor, after a CTD illness, provide work that is consistent with the worker's capabilities. TRAINING AND EDUCATION 1. Assure training of managers, supervisors, and engineers to develop awareness of ergonomic hazards and to supply techniques that may be used to remedy stressors. 2. Develop a training program that instructs workers in the recognition of neutral postures for the body, arm, and hand to avoid repetitive motion or cumulative trauma disorders. Train workers to use minimum stress methods for task performance and enforce its use. DISCLAIMERS: 1. You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2. The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate abatement method. The employer shall be required to submit to the Area Director a detailed plan in writing, outlining the Ergonomics Program and current status of abatement efforts every 90 days until effective abatement is approved. ABATEMENT PERIODS: 6/20/94: a. Provide copy of written program addressing four main elements. b. Outline methods for addressing elements A-G of program. c. Discuss all steps that have been taken to reduce ergonomic stresses on employee tasks.d. Explain in detail all work station modification and changes. 9/19/94: a. Completion of initial worksite analysis and results. b. Copy of initial employee, supervisor, and management training programs. c. Discuss all steps that have been taken to reduce ergonomic stresses on employee tasks. d. Explain in detail all work station modification and changes. 12/19/94: a. Discuss all steps that have been taken to reduce ergonomic stresses on employee tasks. 12/19/94: All abatement efforts shall be completed.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $2700.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Mar 18, 1994
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $540 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $540.00
- — Z (O) $900.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Mar 18, 1994
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $540 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $540.00
- — Z (O) $900.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Mar 18, 1994
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $540 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $540.00
- — Z (O) $900.00
1904.4
- Issued
- Mar 18, 1994
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $1620.00
- — Z (O) $2700.00
1904.4
- Issued
- Mar 18, 1994
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1904.5 C
- Issued
- Mar 18, 1994
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at UT Automotive
View UT Automotive's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 106556327.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.