COLUMBUS, KS ·
OSHA Inspection: ACE ELECTRIC CO., INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ACE ELECTRIC CO., INC. in HWY. #69 SOUTH, COLUMBUS, KS 66725 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106624273.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ACE ELECTRIC CO., INC.
- Site address
- HWY. #69 SOUTH
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 66725
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 151, COLUMBUS, KS 66725
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3694
- Employees
- 425
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 24, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $720 · Current $360 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that, employees were exposed to ergonomic hazards resulting from biomechanical stressors causing or likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders (CTD): (a) The evaluation of coil wrapping operations in Department 100 indicates that 20 employees are exposed to hazards, such as, flexion, extension, abduction, wrist twisting, pinch grip, and radial deviation which are causing or likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. The injury and illness records for 1989 and 1990 document a pattern of cumulative trauma disorders. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include, but are not limited to: 1. Reduction in quanity produced per day per worker by a. Reduction in quota b. Job rotation c. Rotation in type of coil taped 2. More breaks More frequent breaks of short duration. (Stamping and restocking of coils should not be considered breaks. Those jobs also have stressors. 3. Reemphasis on proper work techniques 4. Modify the head of taper by tilting head of taper machine to right to keep body upright instead of leaning to left to see action of taper. 5. Provide chairs that are adjustable in height and lumbar support to minimize back and shoulder strain. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE STEP #1 A. Effective administration controls, such as employee training, physical assessment, job enlargement, job rotation, etc., shall be provided as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering or permanent administrative control can be implemented which will reduce employee exposure to nominal risk. This may involve reduced line speed, reduced piece rate, or limiting overtime work to decrease the amount of repetitive motion work per employee. B. Submit to the Area Director a written compliance program and plan of action outlining a schedule for the implementation of a medical program to identify and control CTDs. C. Design a baseline symptoms survey and complete catalog of job activities. D. Develop light duty and restricted work program for employees with early CTD symptoms. STEP #2 Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule of the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures to biomechanical stressors causing CTDs. The plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation: A. Implementation of workplace education and awareness program which should include the following elements: 1. Instruction of employees in causes of the prevention on CTD. 2. Training of managers and engineers to understand the causes and means to prevent CTDs. Specifically, this should include: a. The causes and the solutions to CTDs; b. Job(s) where the potential for CTDs exist; c. Ergonomic methods of task and work station design; d. Proper oeprations and maintenance of newly implemented control measures. B. Development, testing, and implementation of engineering methods to control employee exposure to biomechanical stressors in the jobs referenced in this citation. This will include: 1. Evaluation of the extent and lcoation of the hazard source; 2. Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; 3. Implementation of control measures; 4. Assurance of control measures effectiveness by monitoring CTD incidents rate for changed jobs. C. Implementation of an ergonomic surveillance, evaluation, and modification program which should include the following elements: 1. Develop a tracking program to identify jobs associated with CTDs to prevent successive or repeated injury or illness on the same jobs. 2. Perform an ergonomic assessment and redesign of operations identified in the tracking program to identify stressors which may be produced by the environment, tools, work station design, or work methods and to provide solutions which will eliminate or significantly reduce the stresses. STEP #3 A. Conduct a symptom's survey plantwide to identify CTDs. B. Initiate semi-annual records review to monitor CTD trends. C. Implement a medical management protocol. D. Implement medical supervisory and employee training. E. Initiate and complete an analysis of all restricted-duty jobs. F. Initiate baseline health surveillance regarding CTD. All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a technically-qualified ergonomist. Ninety (90) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. The 90-day require- ment for the submission of progress reports may be shortened or length- ened by the Area Director depending on the specific circumstances.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $360.00
- · Z (S) $720.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Jun 24, 1991
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $100 · Current $100
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $100.00
- · Z (S) $100.00
More inspections at ACE Electric CO., INC.
View ACE Electric CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 106624273.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.