CHESTERFIELD, MO —
OSHA Inspection: ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL in 232 SOUTH WOODS MILL ROAD, CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106702061.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL
- Site address
- 232 SOUTH WOODS MILL ROAD
- City
- CHESTERFIELD
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63017
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8062
- Employees
- 2000
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of being infected by HBV through direct contact with blood or other body fluids and HBV vaccinations were not offered to health care workers working in SPD Department. Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing the hazard, among others are: offer HBV vaccinations to all employees where potential exposure to blood and body fluids is a substantial risk.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of being infected by HIV and/or HBV through direct contact with blood or other body fluids and appropriate medical follow-up procedures were not established for health care workers in job categories of nursing service, SPD, housekeeping and laundry located throughout the facility. Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing the hazard, among others are: (1) Implementation of follow-up procedures after possible exposure to HIV and/or HBV. If a health care worker has a percutaneous (needlestick or cut) or a mucosa membrane (splash to eye, nasal mucusa, or mouth) exposure to body fluids, or has a cutanueous exposure to blood when the worker's skin is chapped, abraded, or otherwise non- intact, the source patient shall be informed of the incident and tested for HIV and HBV infections, after consent is obtained. If patient consent is refused or if the source patient tests positive, the health care worker shall be evaluated clinically and by HIV antibody testing as soon as possible and advised to report and seek medical evaluation of any acute febrile illness that occurs within 12 weeks after exposure. HIV seronegative workers shall be retested 6 weeks post exposure and on a periodic basis thereafter (12 weeks and 6 months after exposure). Follow up procedures shall be taken for health care workers, exposed or potentially exposed to HBV. The type of procedure depends on the immunization status of the worker (i.e. whether HBV vaccination has been received and antibody response is adequate) and the HBV serologic status of the source patient. The CDC Immunization Practices Advisory Committee has published its recommendations regarding HBV post exposure prophylaxis in table format in the June 17, 1985 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. (a) Employees throughout the facility were not receiving HIV testing following an unknown source needlestick or puncture. (b) Employees throughout the facility were not receiving training following an unknown source needlestick or puncture, on the need to report any febrile illness.
1910.1047 H02
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
1910.1047 J03 I
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
1904.2 B02
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1910.20 G01 I
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 1991
1910.20 G01 II
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 1991
1910.20 G01 III
- Issued
- Oct 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 1991
More inspections at ST. Luke'S Hospital
View ST. Luke'S Hospital's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 106702061.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.