BROOKLYN, NY —
OSHA Inspection: ELUL REALTY CORP.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ELUL REALTY CORP. in 14 53RD STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11232 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 106860513.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELUL REALTY CORP.
- Site address
- 14 53RD STREET
- City
- BROOKLYN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11232
- Mailing
- 40 EXCHANGE PLACE, NEW YORK, NY 10005
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 6512
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 19, 1995
- Abate by
- Jul 24, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: The hazard of being caught in while riding or falling through open shaft way doors because of inoperative shaft way door interlocks, as in: a)In building B; on freight elevators number F 1850 and F 1851, being caught in open shaft way doors while elevator was moving or falling through the opening, and, b)In building A; on freight elevator number F 1852, being caught in the open shaft way doors while the elevator was moving or falling through openings, and, c)In building C; on freight elevator number F 2875, being caught in the open shaft way doors while the elevator was moving or falling through openings, because; The employer failed to insure that interlocks installed on the freight elevators were operable as required by; ASME A 17.3 - 1993 - 2.7.1 Mechanical Locks and Electrical Contacts Permitted for Freight Elevators. (c) Hoist way-unit system combination mechanical locks and electric contacts may be used for manually opened vertically sliding counterbalanced doors or gates under the following conditions: (2) freight elevators with any travel for any door, the sill of which is within 5 ft (1.5 m.) of the bottom of the pit. Hazardous condition was caused by freight elevators that were equipped with non functioning shaft way door interlocks. The employees were exposed when operating, working or riding on the elevators, on or about March 23, 1995. Two of the elevators, numbers F 1852 and F 2875 were being operated under "cease use" violations from The Building Department of The City of New York. Abatement: Among others, a feasible and practical means of abatement would be to install or repair shaft way door electrical contacts as referenced by: ASME A.17.3 1993 2.7.1 (c)(2).
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 19, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Falling as much a six stories through gap at rear of car, being struck by shifting freight that may have hit stationary elements in the shaft way, being caught between moving elevators and shaft when riding, being struck by irregularities in shaft way due to the absence of elevator car rear enclosures because employer failed to enclose elevators as required by; ASME A 17.3 - 1993 - 3.4.1 Car Enclosures; Cars shall be fully enclosed on all non entrance sides and on the top. Employees were exposed when loading, working or riding on the elevators on or before March 23, 1995. Hazards were caused by the freight elevators not having enclosures at the rear of the cars. Elevator cars were numbered; F 1850 and F 1851 and were in building "B". Abatement: Among others, a feasible and practical means of abatement would be to install enclosures as referenced by: ASME A 17.3 - 1993 - 3.4.1 Car Enclosures.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 19, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: The hazard of being struck by or being caught between components of the elevator car and shaft way doors and irregularities in the shaft way because of the lack of front and rear elevator car gates which exposed them to: a)In building "B"; on freight elevators number F 1850 and F 1851 being exposed to hazards due to the lack of front gates on cars and, b)In building "A"; on freight elevator number F 1852 being exposed to hazards on pass through elevator due to the lack of front and rear car gates and; c)In building "C"; on freight elevator number F 2875 being exposed to hazards on pass through elevator due to the lack of front and rear car gates. Employees were exposed on or before March 23, 1995, when operating or riding on the moving elevators because; The employer failed to install or maintain car gates as required by ASME A 17.3 - 1993 - 3.4.2 Car Doors and Gates. (a) Doors, Gates, and Electric Contacts. Cars shall have a car door or gate provided at each entrance equipped with a car door or gate electric contact. Hazardous condition was caused by freight elevators that did not have front or rear car gates. The employees were exposed when operating or riding on the elevators. Abatement: Among others, a feasible and practical means of abatement would be to install or repair elevator car gates as referenced by ASME A 17.3 - 1993 - 3.4.2 (a).2
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 19, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: The hazard of, disorientation due to darkness and, being struck by stationary elements in shaft ways while elevators were moving in the dark, being struck by freight on cars in case of dislodgement in the dark because; Employer failed to install or maintain lights in freight elevators as required by ASME A 17.3 - 1993 3.4.5(a) Interiors of cars shall be provided with an electric light or lights. Not less than two lamps shall be provided and, 3.4.5(b) The minimum illumination at the car threshold with the door closed, shall not be less than: (2) for freight elevators; 2 1/2 ftc. (54 lux) Employees were exposed on or before March 23, 1995, when working or riding on freight elevators due to possible restricted vision due to darkness. Abatement: Among others a feasible and practical means of abatement would be to install lights with minimum illumination as required and specified by: ASME A 17.3 1993, 3.4.5(a) and 3.4.5(b).
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 19, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $450
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: The hazard of a falling elevator car because elevator operator not knowing the capacity of freight elevators might have overloaded car beyond it's capacity. Condition was caused due to the absence of elevator capacity plates. Elevator operators could overload cars number F 1850 - F 1851 in building "B" andnumber F 1852 in building "A" because; Employer failed to install capacity of elevator plates as required by; ASME a 17.3 - 1993, 3.7.4 Capacity Plates, (a) Every elevator shall be provided with a capacity plate permanently and securely fastened in place and located in a conspicuous position inside the car, it shall indicate the rated load of the elevator in pounds, and for freight elevators, this plate or a separate plate shall indicate: (2) for freight elevators used for industrial truck loading where the truck is not usually carried by the elevator but used only for loading and unloading, the maximum load the elevator is designed to support while being loaded and unloaded. Employees were exposed when working on elevators on or before March 23, 1995. Elevator cars had been loaded and unloaded with electric fork lift equipment weighing up to 1,300 lbs. (591 k.) Abatement: Among others, a feasible and practical means of abatement would be; to install elevator capacity plates as referenced in;ASME A 17.3 - 1993, 3.7.4 Capacity Plates.y
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 19, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: The hazard of being struck by stationary elements in shaft ways or falling in shaft way while riding as passengers because elevator cars did not have front or in some cases rear gates due to the absence of signage prohibiting passengers from riding the freight elevators because; Employer failed to install signage as required by; ASME A 17.3 - 1993, 3.7.5 Signs on Freight Elevators, In addition to the capacity plates shall be provided in the elevators not permitted to carry passengers which read: "THIS IS NOT A PASSENGER ELEVATOR, NO PERSONS OTHER THAN THE OPERATOR AND FREIGHT HANDLERS ARE PERMITTED TO RIDE ON THIS ELEVATOR". The sign shall be located in a conspicuous position and permanently and securely fastened to the car enclosure. The signs shall be readily legible with 1/2 inch (13 mm) high letters. Employees were exposed, on or before March 23, 1995, when riding on freight elevators numbers F 1850, F 1851, F 1852 and F 2875. Elevators did not have front or rear gates or enclosures and were intrinsically dangerous. Abatement: A feasible and practical means of abatement would be to install signage as referenced by; ASME a 17.3 - 1993, 3.7.5 Signs on Freight Elevators.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 19, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: The hazard of being trapped in elevator car (in case of fire or emergency) due to not having car emergency signalling devices because; Employer failed to install or maintain in working condition alarm signals in elevators number 2875 - in building "C" and number 1852 -in building "A", as required by: ASME A 17.3 - 1993 - 3.11(a)(1) Car Emergency Signalling Devices, (a) Elevators shall be provided with the following: (1) an audible signalling device, operating from the emergency stop switch, when provided, and from a switch marked "ALARM" which is located inside the building and audible inside the car and outside the hoist way. One signalling device may be used for a group of elevators. Employees were exposed when working on the elevators on or about March 23, 1995. Abatement: Among others a feasible and practical means of abatement would be to install alarm signals as referenced in ASME a 17.3 - 3.11.1(a)(1) Car Emergency Signalling Devices.ng
1910.37 Q01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $450
More inspections at Elul Realty Corp.
View Elul Realty Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 106860513.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.