ALEXANDER CITY, AL ·
OSHA Inspection: GEORGE W. HARDY, FAMILY DENTISTRY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GEORGE W. HARDY, FAMILY DENTISTRY in 119 CHURCH STREET, ALEXANDER CITY, AL 35010 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107008856.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GEORGE W. HARDY, FAMILY DENTISTRY
- Site address
- 119 CHURCH STREET
- City
- ALEXANDER CITY
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35010
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8021
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 23, 1992
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $281 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of being infected with HBV and/or HIV through direct contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials: (a) Employees were exposed due to lack of use of long sleeve lab coats or appropriate clothing during dental procedures. Scrub suits worn by employees had short sleeves, thus leaving the arms exposed. (b) The hazard of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens through an incomprehensive exposure control plan. (1) Employees were exposed due to not having had the Hepatitis B vaccination. The exposure control plan did not specify which employees should be offered the vaccination and a tiame frame for beginning the injection series. (2) Employees were exposed due to improper disposal of bio- hazardous materials. The exposure control plan did not specify what was to be considered biohazardous material, and disposed of accordingly. Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing these hazards, among others are: 1. Requiring the use of long sleeve lab coats, orappropriate clothing by employees at risk of directly contacting blood or other poten- tially infectious materials. 2. Establishing and implementing an exposure control plan that includes having employees at risk vaccinated for Heaptitis B as soon as possible after being employed and proper disposal of all infectious waste, as required by CPL 2-2.44B. 3. Providing training for all employees in the use of personal protective equipment, timely vaccination of employees at risk to Hepatitis B, proper disposal of all infectious waste, and precautionary measures for employee protection against bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $281.25
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jan 23, 1992
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $281 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $281.25
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.20 G01 III
- Issued
- Jan 23, 1992
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 1992
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 107008856.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.