Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: OCEANTRAWL INC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of OCEANTRAWL INC in F/T NORTHERN JAEGER, NAKNEK, AK 99633 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107106205.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Oceantrawl INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Oceantrawl INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
OCEANTRAWL INC
Site address
F/T NORTHERN JAEGER
City
NAKNEK
State
AK
ZIP
99633
Mailing
2025 FIRST AVENUE, 1200 MARKET PLACE TOWER, SEATTLE, WA 98121
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2092
Employees
136
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 4 instances 136 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 1996
Abate by
Aug 17, 1996
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to a recognized hazard of electrical shock or burns:
(a)F/T Northern Jaeger:  The employer's lockout/tagout program did not
contain
lockout/tagout procedures for each individual piece of machinery or
equipment
which had more than one source of energy or the potential of stored
energy.
This
condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns in the
event all
energy sources were not isolated during machinery and equipment repair.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct
this hazard would be to develop, document, and utilize energy control
procedures
for each individual machine or piece of equipment.
(b)F/T Northern Jaeger, galley:  Three 220-volt electrical panels did not
have a
minimum of three feet front working space and access to the panel was
blocked.
This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns in
the
event of contact with and/or repairs to machinery or equipment that cannot
be
deenergized
quickly due to blocked access to electrical panels.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct
this hazard would be to remove the supplies blocking access to the
electrical
panels.
(c)F/T Northern Jaeger, trawl deck, port side:  Employee(s) had occasion
to work
near and/or use a portable hand grinder powered by an extension cord.  The
ground prong was missing from the extension cord and the outer insulation
was
frayed adjacent to the female connection.  This condition exposed
employee(s) to
possible electrical shock or burns in the event of contact with bare
electrical
conductors or energized equipment.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct
this hazard would be to discard the extension cord.
(d)F/T Northern Jaeger, outside rain gear room:  Employee(s) had occasion
to work
near a hatch door with an electrical extension cord running through it to
a
110volt
submergible pump.  This condition exposed employees to possible
electrical
shock or burns in the event the hatch door was closed on the extension
cord and
the insulation abraded.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct
this hazard would be to remove the extension cord from metal pinch points.
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $2500.00

1910.215 A04

Repeat Gravity 02 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 1996
Abate by
Aug 13, 1996
Penalty
Initial $10,000 · Current $3,750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (R) $3750.00
  • · Z (R) $10000.00

1910.215 B09

Repeat Gravity 02 1 instance
Issued
Aug 9, 1996
Abate by
Aug 13, 1996
Recent events (2)
  • · F (R)
  • · Z (R)

View Oceantrawl INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 107106205.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.