Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FISH ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of FISH ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 1400 JEFFERSON ST., PASADENA, TX 77501 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107365751.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fish Engineering & Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fish Engineering & Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1400 JEFFERSON ST.
City
PASADENA
State
TX
ZIP
77501
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1777, PASADENA, TX 77501
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1799
Employees
225
Ownership type
A

192 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
a) atmospheric contamination by asphyxiating and flammable hydrocarbon
vapors when combustible gas detection equipment was not used in
accordance with manufacturers instructions. Sniffers were used to
sample for flammable vapors in nitrogen purge atmospheres in the
Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this
hazard is to follow the manufacturer's instructions (MSA Minigard) that
the equipment not be used in an oxygen deficient atmosphere as the
device that measures the Lower Explosive Limit of the sampled gas cannot
function properly in such an atmosphere; therefore, the reading will be
low.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1000.00
  • — Z (S) $1000.00

1910.134 B03

Serious Gravity 09 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
May 9, 1990
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $900.00

1910.134 B09

Serious Gravity 09 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
May 29, 1990
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $900.00

1910.134 B10

Serious Gravity 09 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
May 9, 1990
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $900.00

1910.1200 H01 III

Serious Gravity 09 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
May 19, 1990
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $900.00

1910.1200 H02 III

Serious Gravity 09 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 28, 1990
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $900.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee,
was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/
hazardous materials where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was
exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous
materials where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee
was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/
hazardous materials where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — A (W) $4000.00
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to
the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials
where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.55
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $521 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee, P.D. Stephens
was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/
hazardous materials where:
a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for
vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and
5 reactors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant
permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook
(Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit
Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725,
authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (W) $521.00
  • — Z (W) $4000.00

1904.2 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Penalty
Initial $100 · Current $100
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O) $100.00
  • — Z (O) $100.00

1910.20 G01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.20 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.134 E05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
May 23, 1990
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.134 F02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 181 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 1990
Abate by
Apr 24, 1990
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O)
  • — Z (O)

View Fish Engineering & Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 107365751.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.