PASADENA, TX —
OSHA Inspection: FISH ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of FISH ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 1400 JEFFERSON ST., PASADENA, TX 77501 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107365751.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FISH ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 1400 JEFFERSON ST.
- City
- PASADENA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77501
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1777, PASADENA, TX 77501
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1799
- Employees
- 225
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
192 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a) atmospheric contamination by asphyxiating and flammable hydrocarbon vapors when combustible gas detection equipment was not used in accordance with manufacturers instructions. Sniffers were used to sample for flammable vapors in nitrogen purge atmospheres in the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to follow the manufacturer's instructions (MSA Minigard) that the equipment not be used in an oxygen deficient atmosphere as the device that measures the Lower Explosive Limit of the sampled gas cannot function properly in such an atmosphere; therefore, the reading will be low.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.134 B03
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- May 9, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $900.00
1910.134 B09
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- May 29, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $900.00
1910.134 B10
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- May 9, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $900.00
1910.1200 H01 III
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- May 19, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $900.00
1910.1200 H02 III
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $900
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $900.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee, was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/ hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/ hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — A (W) $4000.00
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $522 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.55
- — Z (W) $4000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee, P.D. Stephens was exposed to the possible release and/or ignition of flammable/ hazardous materials where: a) Hot work permits with combustible gas monitoring were not used for vehicle entry into the reactor areas of the Polyethylene Plants 4 and 5 reactors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement and enforce an effective plant permit system such as stipulated in Fish's Supervisors Handbook (Standard Procedures for Permit Issuance and Vehicle Entry Permit Program), and in Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, page 725, authored by Frank P. Less, published by Butterworth.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $521.00
- — Z (W) $4000.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $100 · Current $100
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $100.00
- — Z (O) $100.00
1910.20 G01 III
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.20 G02
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 E05
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- May 23, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 F02 IV
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Fish Engineering & Construction, INC.
View Fish Engineering & Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 107365751.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.