BRAINTREE, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: CARTER RICE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CARTER RICE in 28 IVORY STREET, BRAINTREE, MA 02184 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107446312.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CARTER RICE
- Site address
- 28 IVORY STREET
- City
- BRAINTREE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02184
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 5113
- Employees
- 48
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 12, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $2,125 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employeeshave injured their backs while handling cartons of paper weighing up to 160 lbs. for up to 16 hours per day in the Warren Dept. The handling of the cartons involves the following three stressful actions: (a) Breaking apart glued-together cartons. (b) Sliding the carton off the storage rack pallet while the pallet is on the forks of a fork truck. (c) Lowering the carton onto the shipping pallet while holding the carton at one end, some of the following methods of abatement and/or combinations of them may be used to deal with this problem: (1) Provide a materials handling device to handle the cartons. (2) Refuse to receive cartons of paper over a certain weight. (3) Refuse to receive cartons of paper that are glued together. (4) Have two men working together in the Warren Department. (5) Provide a tool to break glued-together cartons apart and enforce its use. (6) Rotate warehouse employees. (7) Hire more employees to reduce the hours warehouse employees are being required to work. Abatement Schedule Step 1 - Effective administrative protection, such as employee training physical assessment, job rotation, etc., shall be provided as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering or permanent administrative controls can be implemented which will reduce employee exposure to nominal risk. Step 2 - A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee injury due to annual lifting tests. Engineering controls to reduce musculoskeletal stresses include, but are not limited to: job redesign, reduction of the lifting aids. This plan shall include, at a minumum, target dates for the following actions, which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation. (1) Evaluation of the conditions, locations and manual lifting activities that the employees are performing at the onset of musculoskeletal injuries. (2) Evaluation of applicable control measures. (3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; (4) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls; All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. 90-day progress reports are required during the abatement period. Step 3 - Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon veri- fication of their effectiveness in reducing the occurrance of musculoskeletal injuries.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $2125.00
- · A (S) $2125.00
- · Z (S) $2625.00
1910.30 A04
- Issued
- Mar 12, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- · A (O)
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.176 A
- Issued
- Mar 12, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · A (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Mar 12, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · A (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · A (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.304 F05 V
- Issued
- Mar 12, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · A (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 1992
1910.305 G01 I
- Issued
- Mar 12, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 1992
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 1992
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 107446312.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.