WEST BOYLSTON, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: WALTER C. CRANSTON COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WALTER C. CRANSTON COMPANY in 205A WEST BOYLSTON STREET, WEST BOYLSTON, MA 01583 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107459950.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WALTER C. CRANSTON COMPANY
- Site address
- 205A WEST BOYLSTON STREET
- City
- WEST BOYLSTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01583
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7538
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 11, 1989
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $200 · Current $150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a) BEING STRUCK AND/OR CRUSHED BY FALLING LIFT AND SUSPENDED LOAD. THE TWO-POST DESIGN AUTOMOBILE LIFTS LOCATED IN BAY 6 DID NOT HAVE A WORKABLE AUTOMATIC MECHANICAL DEVICE, CAPABLE OF HOLDING THE LIFT AND ITS SUSPENDED LOAD IN THE FULLY EXTENDED POSITION AS REQUIRED IN ANSI B153.1-1974. THE EXISTING MECHANICAL DEVICE WAS NOT EQUIPPED WITH THE SPRING LOADED LOCKING MECHANISM NECESSARY FOR PROPER FUNCTIONING. IN THE EVENT OF HYDRAULIC FAILURE, THE SAFETY DEVICE WOULD NOT BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING THE SUSPENDED LOAD. A FEASIBLE AND USEFUL METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS TO REPAIR THE EXISTING SAFETY SUPPORTS AND CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN THEM SO THAT THEY ARE ALWAYS IN WORKING ORDER.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $150.00
- · Z (S) $200.00
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 1989
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $120 · Current $90 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $90.00
- · Z (S) $120.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 1989
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 1989
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 107459950.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.