Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A. ABLE INCORPORATED

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of A. ABLE INCORPORATED in RD #6, TOLL GATE HILL, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107462244.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A. Able Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A. Able Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
RD #6, TOLL GATE HILL
City
GREENSBURG
State
PA
ZIP
15601
Mailing
P.O. BOX 101, GREENSBURG, PA 15601
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
8734
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 28, 1993
Abate by
Dec 30, 1993
Penalty
Initial $225
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to:
(a)  At the hydrostatic test apparatus employees are exposed
to the hazard of compressed gas cylinder failure.  The
following conditions contribute to the existence of this hazard:
1.  The use of a compressed gas cylinder as a hydrostatic
pressure accumulator at pressures in excess of the rated
capacity of the cylinder had not been approved by a
competent person such as a professional engineer.
2.  The cylinder had not been placed within a protective
barrier or otherwise isolated in a manner that would not
subject employees to injury in the event of cylinder failure.
Feasible methods of abatement would include the following:
1.  Approval by a competent person that routine over-pressurization
of the cylinder would not cause the cylinder to fail in such a
way that creates a hazard to employees.
2.  Place the cylinder within a protective enclosure that would
prevent employee injury in the event of cylinder failure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $225.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 107462244.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.