GREENSBURG, PA —
OSHA Inspection: A. ABLE INCORPORATED
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of A. ABLE INCORPORATED in RD #6, TOLL GATE HILL, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107462244.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A. ABLE INCORPORATED
- Site address
- RD #6, TOLL GATE HILL
- City
- GREENSBURG
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15601
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 101, GREENSBURG, PA 15601
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8734
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 28, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $225
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) At the hydrostatic test apparatus employees are exposed to the hazard of compressed gas cylinder failure. The following conditions contribute to the existence of this hazard: 1. The use of a compressed gas cylinder as a hydrostatic pressure accumulator at pressures in excess of the rated capacity of the cylinder had not been approved by a competent person such as a professional engineer. 2. The cylinder had not been placed within a protective barrier or otherwise isolated in a manner that would not subject employees to injury in the event of cylinder failure. Feasible methods of abatement would include the following: 1. Approval by a competent person that routine over-pressurization of the cylinder would not cause the cylinder to fail in such a way that creates a hazard to employees. 2. Place the cylinder within a protective enclosure that would prevent employee injury in the event of cylinder failure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $225.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 107462244.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.