BOSTON, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: THE FLATLEY COMPANY
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of THE FLATLEY COMPANY in 18 TREMONT STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107542300.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE FLATLEY COMPANY
- Site address
- 18 TREMONT STREET
- City
- BOSTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02108
- Mailing
- 50 BRAINTREE HILL OFFICE PARK, BRAINTREE, MA 02184
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 6531
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 16, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $2,625
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that, employees were exposed to the following conditions: (a) (1) Second Floor Roof: The double hung windows located on the second floor roof adjacent to the platforms leading from stairwells 1 and 2 were not labeled fire window frames, as required by NFPA 80 Section 12-1.1, 1983. (a) (2) Basement: The basement window located beneath the base of the swinging stair when it is extended was not a labeled fire window frame, as required by NFPA 80 Section 12-1.1, 1983. One method, among other methods to abate these conditions is to install fire rated windows and window frames. (b) Second Floor Roof: The double hung windows located on the second floor roof adjacent to the platform leading from stairwells 1 and 2 were not of the fixed type nor were they equipped with automatic closures, as required by NFPA 80 Section 12-5, 1983. One method among other methods to abate the condition is to install automatic closures or fix the windows in a closed position. (c) Second Floor Roof: The second floor roof, which serves as an integral component of the means of egress for stairwells 1 and 2 did not have a fire resistance rating of two hours, as required by NFPA 101 5-2.2.5.3, 1991. One method among other methods to abate the condition is to construct the second floor roof with a material that has a fire resistance rating of two hours. (d) Stairwells 1 and 2: The existing signs located in stairwells 1 and 2 were inadequate in that the signs did not indicate the terminus of the top and bottom of the stairwells and the floor of exit discharge. Also, the existing signs were not readily visible when the doors were in the open and closed positions, as requiured by NFPA 101 Section 5-2.2.6.6, 1991. One method among other methods to abate the condition is to affix appropriate signs at each floor landing of stairwells 1 and 2. (e) Second Floor Roof: The handrails of the swinging stairs located on the second floor roof were not designed to prevent the possibility of injury to individuals in that shear points and nip points were created when the stairs swing downward, as required by NFPA 101 Section 5-2.8.7.5, 1991. One method among other methods to abate the condition is to guard the nip points and shear points. (f) Second Floor Roof: A locking device was installed on the swinging stairs, in violation of NFPA 101 Section 5-2.8.7.9, 1991. One method among other methods to abate the condition is to remove the locking device. (g) Stairwell 2, 12th Floor: The fire escape ladder located between the 12th and 11th floor did not comply with the requirements of NFPA 101 Section 27-2.2.10, 1991. One method among other methods to abate the condition is to install a standard set of stairs.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $2625.00
1910.36 B01
- Issued
- Dec 16, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $2,625
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $2625.00
1910.36 B02
- Issued
- Dec 16, 1992
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $2,625
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2625.00
- · Z (S) $2625.00
1910.36 B06
- Issued
- Dec 16, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $1,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1625.00
- · Z (S) $2625.00
1910.37 A
- Issued
- Dec 16, 1992
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $2,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2250.00
- · Z (S) $2625.00
1910.37 H01
- Issued
- Dec 16, 1992
- Abate by
- Feb 1, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $1,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1625.00
- · Z (S) $2625.00
1910.37 K02
- Issued
- Dec 16, 1992
- Abate by
- Feb 1, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $1,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1625.00
- · Z (S) $2625.00
More inspections at The Flatley Company
View The Flatley Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 107542300.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.