MORRISTOWN, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: ALLIED SIGNAL
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ALLIED SIGNAL in 101 COLUMBIA TURNPIKE, MORRISTOWN, NJ 07960 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 107653891.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALLIED SIGNAL
- Site address
- 101 COLUMBIA TURNPIKE
- City
- MORRISTOWN
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07960
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8731
- Employees
- 1000
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 21, 1993
- Abate by
- May 24, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: the hazard of a runaway reaction and uncontrolled release of confined gases and reactants: a) On or about 11/9/92 one research technician was seriously hurt during a step in the pilot production of DMHA (dimethyl hydroxyl amine). During the quaternization step of the process in a 30 gallon reactor vessel, a sudden unexpected pressure rise resulted in the rapid uncontrolled release of confined gases. This event resulted in the attending technician suffering a broken arm. The employer did not adequately investigate or otherwise account for the effect of the separation and neutralization on the thermal sensitivity of O-MBDO and any possible subsequent effect on the quaternization phase of the DMHA process prior to its use in a pilot plant production level reaction. b) The most appropriate methods were not utilized to safely heat the O-MBDO and dimethyl sulfate mixture thereby increasing the risk of a runaway exothermic reaction during the quaternization phase of the pilot plant DMHA production. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct the hazard include: 1. Conduct a complete stability and process hazard analysis of the quaternization phase of DMHA production. This analysis must account for the effects of isolation and neutralization and subsequent use of "acidwashed" O-MBDO in the quaternization phase of DMHA production. 2. Completely re-evaluate the way the O-MBDO/DMS mixture is heated, with appropriate consideration given to its "strong exothermic reaction" and with emphasis on the use of the safest heating method available, e.g. hot water bath. Ref: Discussion Section of Dust-Tech Inc. 1992 Report Section "D".
More inspections at Allied Signal
View Allied Signal's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 107653891.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.