DELMONT, PA —
OSHA Inspection: CNG TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CNG TRANSMISSION CORPORATION in ROUTE 22, DELMONT, PA 15626 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 108751413.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CNG TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
- Site address
- ROUTE 22
- City
- DELMONT
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15626
- Mailing
- 445 W. MAIN STREET, CLARKSBURG, WV 26302
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4922
- Employees
- 1300
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 1996
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $3,250 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to hazards arising from the unexpected rupture of a tank: (a) Tank #1; Inspection and testing of certain tank components which acted to keep pressure in the tank to below 5 p.s.i. were not adequate. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard are: 1. Any safety devices, or devices which serve as safety devices in that they act to maintain pressure in the tank to below 5 p.s.i. shall be part of a regularly scheduled inspection and testing program. Any defects/problems which are discovered that may affect the proper functioning of these devices will be immediately corrected. The company will send this protocol to the Pittsburgh Area Office of OSHA within 15 days of the signing of this settlement agreement for review. 2. All inspections of the safety devices referred to above will be performed by qualified individuals. 3. Only OBM parts will be used in the above referenced devices. 4. Atmospheric corrosion inspections will continue to be conducted. 5. The "Protectoseal" units will continue to be cleaned on an annual basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $3250.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 1996
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 1996
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employmnent and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) #1 Tank; Workers performing maintenance, repairs and services to the "Protectoseal" pressure relieving devices on the 12,000 gallon distillate tank and the device either clogged or malfunctioned causing the tank to fail. Inspection revealed the device interior was corroded and the top plate "O" ring was crushed and flattened. There was no documented quality control system for testing and repair. This condition exposed workers to fire and explosion hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to have a documented quality control program and repair personnel trained and qualified meeting all applicable provisions of American Petroleum Institute API 510 Seventh Edition dated March, 1992 with Supplements 1 and 2.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 1996
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $3,250 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to hazards arising from the unexpected rupture of a tank: (a) Tank #1; Sufficient devices specifically designed to maintain pressure in the tank to below 5 p.s.i. were not in place. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard are: 1. The tank will be equipped with an emergency relief device that will provide a pressure relief backup to the "Protectoseal" unit, ensuring that the pressure in the tank is maintained at below 5 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $3250.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 1996
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 1996
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) #1 Tank; Workers performing maintenance services and repairs to the distorted and bulged distillate vessel and it's pressure relieving devices and there were no permanent and progressive records such as the manufacturer's data report, the results of inspection, repairs and alterations of the vessel and it's devices. The vessel failed which caused the workers to be exposed to fire and explosion hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to have permanent and progressive records and results of inspections, repairs, alterations or rerating meeting all applicable provisions of American Petroleum Institute API 510 standard dated March, 1992 Seventh Edition with Supplements 1 and 2.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 5, 1996
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $3,250 · Current $3,250
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) #1 Tank; Workers pressurizing a 12,000 gallon storage tank with pressures that ranged between 5 and 17 p.s.i. and the tank was not designed nor certified for such use. Additionally, the details and construction records were not available. On 11/12/95 the tank exploded as a result of excessive pressure thereby exposing workers to fire and explosion hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to have the manufacturer's data report or the subject of approval by an authorized inspector meeting the rules of American Petroleum Institute Standard API 620 Fourth Edition dated February, 1970.ary,
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3250.00
- — Z (S) $3250.00
More inspections at CNG Transmission Corporation
View CNG Transmission Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 108751413.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.