KEENE, NH —
OSHA Inspection: NATIONAL SERVICE GROUP, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of NATIONAL SERVICE GROUP, INC. in ROSE LN., KEENE, NH 03431 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 108781964.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NATIONAL SERVICE GROUP, INC.
- Site address
- ROSE LN.
- City
- KEENE
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03431
- Mailing
- 161 RIVER RD., ELIOT, ME 03903
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1799
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
16 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of fire, explosion, oxygen deficiency, and toxic atmospheres: a.Rose Lane Jobsite - On or about 8/31/93, employees of National Service Group Inc. were exposed to potential fire, explosion, oxygen deficiency or toxic levels of materials such as, but not limited to, xylene, toluene, n-butyl acetate, and nbutyl alcohol while applying and spray finishing coating in a confined space (Tank #4) without the benefit of a fully developed and implemented confined space entry program, in that elements such as, but not limited to the following, were not addressed: (1)The hazards involved were not properly identified and addressed prior to entry. The hazards also were not examined with respect to hazard exposure, magnitude and likelihood and consequences, staging for hazard control, and impact on the need for emergency response. (2)The permit did not address the changing conditions in the tank during spray operations. (3)The space was not marked as a "confined space." (4)The attendant/rescue person was not stationed at the tank opening. Attendant duties are as follows: (a)Provide standby assistance to occupants entering the confined space. (b)Direct occupants to exit the confined space when any irregularities are observed. (c)Initiate evacuation and emergency procedures. (d)Monitor for conditions that could adversely affect the entry. (e)Remain at the entry point unless relieved by another attendant. (5)The attendant and occupant were not in constant two-way communication. (6)When ventilation was not possible or feasible, alternative protective measures or methods to remove air contaminants or protect occupants were not determined by the qualified person prior to authorizing entry. (7)Appropriate retrieval equipment was not used whenever a person enters a permit required confined space.(8)A plan of action was not written with provisions to conduct a timely rescue for individuals in a confined space should an emergency have arisen. Included in the provisions should be, at least: (a)Determination of what methods of rescue must be implemented to retrieve individuals. (b)Designation of rescue personnel that are immediately available when entries are conducted. (c)Type and availability of equipment needed to rescue individuals. (d)An effective means to summon rescuers in a timely manner. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct these hazards is to implement and enforce a confined space entry program in accordance with American National Standard Safety Requirements for Confined Spaces (ANSI)Z117.1-1989. b.Rose Lane Jobsite - On or about 8/31/93, employees of National Service Group Inc. were exposed to potential fire and explosion hazards while applying a flammable spray finishing coating in a tank where the components of the airless spray coating application system had not been tested to determine the quality of electrical conductivity; proper electrical bonding procedures had not been taken; and equipment of different manufacturers had been combined in the same system. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct these hazards is to follow the airless spray system's manufacturer recommendations as well as the National Fire Protection Association NFPA-77 entitled, "Recommended Practice on Static Electricity."
1926.21 B06 I
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 1994
1926.59 G08
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $375
1926.103 D11
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $375
1926.103 F02 II
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $375
1926.103 H04
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 1994
1926.152 A01
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1926.152 D02
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1926.152 E02
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $375
1926.350 A07
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $375
1926.350 J
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1926.407 B
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
1926.451 C13
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $375
1926.103 D02
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1994
1926.350 A09
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1994
1926.1148 D01 I
- Issued
- Jan 28, 1994
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1994
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 108781964.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.