SOMERSET, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: SEEGER INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SEEGER INC. in 500 MEMORIAL DRIVE, SOMERSET, NJ 08873 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 108901067.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SEEGER INC.
- Site address
- 500 MEMORIAL DRIVE
- City
- SOMERSET
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08873
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3429
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $525 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that on or about 4/15/92, employees were exposed to hydrochloric acid fumes: a- Pollution Area, employee is required to enter and clean an open surface fiberglass tank used for water treatment. The tank contains dydrochloric acid fumes which could over come and asphixiate an individual. The confined spaced entry procedures of the company are deficient, in that: 1- The employer did not completely evaluate the hazard of confined spaces. 2- The employer did not establish a written permit system, to certify that all hazards have been evaluated. 3- The employer did not provide adequate training to employees so that they can work safely in the confined space areas. 4- The employer did not provide, maintain or ensure the proper use of the equipment necessary for safe entry. 5- There was no rescue equipment provided to the standby personnel. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to implement a confined space entry procedure which includes, but is not limited to, the following items: 1- Provide instruction and training as to the nature of the hazards involved and the necessary precautions to be taken relative to confined space entry. 2- Post written confined space entry procedures adjacent to all vessel or basement entry ports. 3- Issue a proper entry permit prior to confined space entry to ensure that all hazards have been evaluated. 4- Conduct atmospheric testing to determine potential oxygen deficiency and the presence of air contaminants. 5- Where it has been determined that the confined space contains a hazardous concentration of an air contaminant and/or an oxygen deficiency, use of mechanically-induced ventilation in the confined space before entry and during occupancy and/or use of respiratory protective equipment, which provides adequate protection against the hazards involved, shall be provided. 6- Provisions for a standby, observer, located outside the confined space area, and readily available standby equipment, consisting of a safety line, harness and appropriate selfcontained respiratory equipment. 7- Hot work or the use of an open flame shall not be begun within a confined space until an appropriate entry permit had been issued.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $525.00
- · Z (S) $875.00
1910.23 B01 I
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $315 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $315.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.24 B
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $315 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $315.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $525 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $525.00
- · Z (S) $875.00
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $420.00
- · Z (S) $700.00
1910.165 B02
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $525 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $525.00
- · Z (S) $875.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $420.00
- · Z (S) $700.00
1910.217 C02 IV
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $525 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $525.00
- · Z (S) $875.00
1910.303 G02
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $420.00
- · Z (S) $700.00
1910.134 B02
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 1992
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Oct 13, 1992
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 1992
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 108901067.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.