MIDDLETOWN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: BLUEWATER ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of BLUEWATER ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC. in 1349 RIVER ROAD, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06450 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 109180067.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BLUEWATER ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Site address
- 1349 RIVER ROAD
- City
- MIDDLETOWN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06450
- Mailing
- 3459 ACWORTH DUE WEST ROAD, SUITE 206, ACWORTH, GA 30101
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1799
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
20 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.65 Q01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.150 E01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.150 E02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.501 B04 I
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.352 C
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $65,600
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $65600
- — Z (S) $0
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $0 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recogn ized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that the method used to clean the 561 main fuel gas line pipes - blowing nat ural gas through them at high velocity - was not implemented in such a way as to protect employees from the hazard of an explosion caused by venting large amoun ts of natural gas into areas where it could accumulate and where, or in close pr oximity to where, ignition sources existed. The following conditions and practic es contributed to the existence of this hazard: the vent pipe configured close t o and below scaffolding, in close proximity to the Power Generation Building, in between two approximately 115 foot tall Heat Recovery Steam Generators (HRSGs) and well below the tops of all of those structures; the failure to eliminate ope n flame ignition sources, including but not limited to propane heaters; construc tion work occurring during the gas blow process; individuals other than those essential to conducting the gas blows working in the area during the gas b low process; and the inability to readily control the amount and pressure of gas flowing through the main gas fuel line. On February 7, 2010, employees were exp osed to serious or fatal impact and other injuries from an explosion hazard crea ted when a large amount of natural gas was blown at high velocity through CT#1 M ain Knockout Drum Vent Pipe (561-TNK-1002) into the area between the two HRSGs a nd close to buildings, scaffolding, partially enclosed work areas, and other str uctures that were adjacent to the Power Generation Building in which employees w orked and in or around which open flame ignition sources, including but not limi ted to propane heaters, existed, construction work was occurring, and numerous e mployees non-essential to conducting the gas blow were working. When natural gas is chosen for this method of cleaning gas line pipes, feasible means of abatement to eliminate or materially reduce the hazard are to ensure th at the vent pipe is positioned vertically and above the Power Generation Buildin g and all other nearby structures, or horizontally to a location away from struc tures that could inhibit the adequate dispersal of the gas; ensure that any and all ignition sources are eliminated; ensure that any and all construction activi ty ceases during the gas blow process; ensure that all workers other than those essential to conducting the gas blows are removed from the building and area aro und which the gas blows are occurring; and ensure the use of devices to control the amount and pressure of gas vented, such as a fast closing pipe shut-off valv e and a gas pressure control valve.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $0
- — Z (W) $70000
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $0 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recogn ized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that the method use d to clean the 561 main fuel gas line pipes - blowing natural gas through them a t high velocity - was not implemented in such a way as to protect employees from the hazard of an explosion caused by venting large amounts of natural gas into areas where it could accumulate and where, or in close proximity to where, ignit ion sources existed. The following conditions and practices contributed to the e xistence of this hazard: the vent pipe configured close to and below scaffolding , in close proximity to the Power Generation Building, in the area immediately e ast of the two approximately 115 foot tall Heat Recovery Steam Generators (HRSGs ) and well below the tops of all of those structures; the failure to eliminate o pen flame ignition sources, including but not limited to propane heaters; constr uction work occurring during the gas blow process; individuals other than those essential to conducting the gas blows working in the area during the gas blow pr ocess; and the inability to readily control the amount and pressure of gas flowing through the main gas fuel line. On February 7, 2010, employees were expo sed to serious or fatal impact and other injuries from an explosion hazard creat ed when a large amount of natural gas was blown at high velocity through CT#2 Ma in Knockout Drum Vent Pipe (561-TNK-2002) into the area immediately east of HRSG number 2 and close to buildings, scaffolding, partially enclosed work areas, an d other structures that were adjacent to the Power Generation Building in which employees worked and in or around in which open flame ignition sources, includin g but not limited to propane heaters, existed, construction work was occurring, and numerous employees non-essential to conducting the gas blow were working. Wh en natural gas is chosen for this method of cleaning gas line pipes, feasible me ans of abatement to eliminate or materially reduce the hazard are to ensure that the ve nt pipe is positioned vertically and above the Power Generation Building and all other nearby structures, or horizontally to a location away from structures tha t could inhibit the adequate dispersal of the gas; ensure that any and all ignit ion sources are eliminated; ensure that any and all construction activity ceases during the gas blow process; ensure that all workers other than those essential to conducting the gas blows are removed from the building and area around which the gas blows are occurring; and ensure the use of devices to control the amoun t and pressure of gas vented, such as a fast closing pipe shut-off valve and a g as pressure control valve.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $0
- — Z (W) $70000
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $0 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recogn ized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that the method used to clean the 561 main fuel gas line pipes - blowing natural gas through the m at high velocity - was not implemented in such a way as to protect employees f rom the hazard of an explosion caused by venting large amounts of natural gas in to areas where it could accumulate and where, or in close proximity to where, ig nition sources existed. The following conditions and practices contributed to th e existence of this hazard: the vent pipe configured close to and below scaffold ing, in close proximity to the Power Generation Building, in the area immediatel y east of the two approximately 115 foot tall Heat Recovery Steam Generators (HR SGs) and well below the tops of all of those structures; the failure to eliminat e open flame ignition sources, including but not limited to propane heaters; con struction work occurring during the gas blow process; individuals other than tho se essential to conducting the gas blows working in the area during the gas blow process; and the inability to readily control the amount and pressure of gas fl owing through the main gas fuel line. On February 7, 2010, employees were exposed to serious or fa tal impact and other injuries from an explosion hazard created when a large amou nt of natural gas was blown at high velocity through CT#2 Pilot Gas Filter Separ ator "A" Vent Pipe (561- SEP-2000A) into the area immediately east of HRSG numbe r 2 and close to buildings, scaffolding, partially enclosed work areas, and othe r structures that were adjacent to the Power Generation Building in which employ ees worked and in or around in which open flame ignition sources, including but not limited to propane heaters, existed, construction work was occurring, and nu merous employees non-essential to conducting the gas blow were working. When nat ural gas is chosen for this method of cleaning gas line pipes, feasible means of abatement to eliminate or materially reduce the hazard are to ensure that the vent pipe is positioned vertically and above the Power Generation Building and a ll other nearby structures, or horizontally to a location away from structures t hat could inhibit the adequate dispersal of the gas; ensure that any and all ign ition sources are eliminated; ensure that any and all construction activity ceas es during the gas blow process; ensure that all workers other than those essenti al to conducting the gas blows are removed from the building and area around whi ch the gas blows are occurring; and ensure the use of devices to control the amo unt and pressure of gas vented, such as a fast closing pipe shut-off valve and a gas pressure control valve.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $0
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $65,300 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $65300
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $65,300 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $65300
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $65,300 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $65300
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $65,300 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $65300
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $65,300 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $65300
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $65,300 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $65300
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $65,300 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $65300
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $65,300 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (U) $65300
- — Z (W) $70000
1926.352 C
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $0 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $0
- — Z (W) $70000
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $70000
- — Z (W) $0
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $0
- — Z (W) $0
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2010
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
- Emphasis program
- X
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $0
- — Z (W) $0
More inspections at Bluewater Energy Solutions, INC.
View Bluewater Energy Solutions, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109180067.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.