GRAND ISLAND, NE —
OSHA Inspection: MONFORT, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MONFORT, INC. in 555 S. STUHR ROAD, GRAND ISLAND, NE 68801 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109320937.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MONFORT, INC.
- Site address
- 555 S. STUHR ROAD
- City
- GRAND ISLAND
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68801
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 2137, GRAND ISLAND, NE 68802
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2011
- Employees
- 1600
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
identifies and details a schedule for the implementation of the medical management program developed in accordance with section III, above. The medical management program shall be developed and approved by a medical provider who is qualified in the recognition, evaluation and treatment of ergonomic related injuries Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The and illnesses, such as CTDs. Ninety (90) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. STEP 6 Implementation of an effective medical management program shall be completed. employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or were likely to cause serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were required to perform tasks involving ergonomic risk factors, including but not limited to, repetitive motions, high force and/or awkward postures, resulting in stressors that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorder(s): (a) CHUCK BONER: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the ergonomic stressors of back flexion, wrist extension, radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist, shoulder abduction and extension, and high force and frequency of repetition which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (b) CLOD PULLER AND CLOD PULLER MACHINE: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the ergonomic stressors of back flexion, wrist extension and flexion, radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist, shoulder abduction and extension, high force and frequency of repetition, and high acceleration and decelerations of the arm, hand and wrist which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (c) DROP ROUND: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the erognomic stressors of back flexion, wrist extension and flexion, radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist, shoulder abduction and flexion, high force and frequency of repetition, and high acceleration and decelerations of the arm, hand and wrist which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (d) AITCH BONER AND AITCH BONER/SEAMER: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the erognomic stressors of back flexion, wrist extension and flexion, radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist, shoulder abduction and flexion, high force and frequency of repetition which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (e) PULL OFF: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the erognomic stressors of back flexion, wrist extension and flexion, radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist, shoulder abduction and flexion, high force and frequency of repetition which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (f) BAGGING: Evaluation of this task (specifically, BAGGING CHUCKS) indicates that employees are exposed to the ergonomic stressors of back torsion, pinch grasp, shoulder abduction, high force and frequency of repetition which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (g) PACKER: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the erognomic stressors of back flexion, wrist extension and flexion, ulnar deviation of the wrist, shoulder abduction and flexion, high force and frequency of repetition which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (h) DEFLESHER: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the ergonomic stressors of back flexion, wrist deviations, shoulder abduction and flexion, high pinch and grasp force, and high frequency of repetition which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (i) RIB BONER: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the ergonomic stressors of back flexion, wrist flexion, radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist, shoulder abduction and flexion, high hand forces and frequency of repetition, and high accelerations and decelerations of the arm, hand and wrist which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (j) SHORT RIB BONER: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the ergonomic stressors of back flexion, wrist flexion, radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist,shoulder abduction and flexion, high pinch and grasp forces and frequency of repetition, which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. (k) HIDE TANK PULLER: Evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to the ergonomic stressors of back flexion, wrist flexion, extension and ulnar deviation, shoulder abduction and extension, high pinch, grasp, and pulling forces and frequency of repetition, which are causing or are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. A review of injury and illness records, such as those covering the period of time from January through October of 1992, document that a significant number of cumulative trauma disorders have been caused by exposure to these stressors. ABATEMENT METHODS: Feasible means to correct these hazards include the implementation of a comprehensive written ergonomics management program, developed by a qualified ergonomist, and a comprehensive medical management program developed by a qualified health care provider, which includes the following elements: I. WORKSITE ANALYSIS to recognize and identify existing ergonomic risk factors in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic illness checklist and employee questionnaire. Frequent surveys of the workplace shall be conducted by a qualified ergonomist to identify and evaluate ergonomic stressors and the work practices and engineering controls needed for their abatement. The survey shall include a job analysis of all high risk, restricted duty, and other jobs used within an administrative control schema. The job analysis shall specifically identify all ergonomic stressors and the body part affected. Employee participation in the program should be encouraged through a mechanism such as a safety committee. II. HAZARD PREVENTION AND CONTROL which includes the development and use of engineering, work practice and administrative control measures and personal protective equipment, where deemed relevant. a) Engineering controls are to be designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include workstation redesign, tool redesign, and changes in work methods. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of control measures applicable to the cited workstations listed above may include but are not limited to the following: 1) CHUCK BONER: i) Redesign knife handle for stab position. ii) Mechanical separation of the ribs, possibly when the chuck is still attached to the side that is hanging. iii) Additional crewing. 2) CLOD PULLER AND CLOD PULLER MACHINE: i) Redesign knife handle for stab position. ii) Modify conveyor so that beginning cuts are made at chest level. iii) Provide mechanical assist to pull clod away from the meat as the cuts are being made. iv) Redesign the clod puller job so that the clod puller machine job is not necessary. v) If the clod puller machine is retained then redesign the hook and workstation such that postures are improved and the force and highly dynamic activity is lessened by; develop twosided powered hook to attach onto opposing sides of the clod, move power hook switch from floor to handle in the left hand. 3) DROP ROUND: i) Modify conveyor so that both beginning and ending cuts are made at chest level. ii) Provide a mechanical assist to pull the round away from the meat as the cuts are being made. iii) Provide additional crewing. 4) AITCH BONER AND AITCH BONER/SEAMER: i) Provide a mechanical assist for pulling the aitch bone from the round such as a hydraulic or mechanical draw chain to grasp onto the aitch bone while teeth or hook hold the round. 5) PULL OFF: i) Provide a mechanical sorter or ram controlled by the worker. ii) Provide a hydraulic pull with pivot on slide to move meat. iii) Either elevate the main conveyor 4-6" or lower the secondary conveyor. iv) Train workers to slide meat rather than lift it. 6) BAGGING: i) Place empty bags closer to steel rods to eliminate long reaches. ii) Redesign bagging station, to use roll bag tubing which is cut off and sealed at the bottom of bag. Use air assist to help open the bag. 7) PACKER: i) Adjust height of worker with a platform or lower arriving conveyor. ii) Redesign workstations so that the worker stands next to the conveyor, between boxes, not behind boxes. iii) Eliminate overhead reach for new boxes, have the sticker close, and have box supply replenished by another worker. iv) Have automated or powered pusher for moving the full box onto the lower conveyor. v) Install diverter or narrow conveyor to reduce reach. 8) DEFLESHER: i) Provide powered clamps to help lift and orient the hide for the first cycle. ii) Install the second machine such that the hide is automatically fed into it after the first cycle. 9) RIB BONER: i) Placing the work surface at 90 from conveyor facing oncoming ribs to lessen reach. ii) Provide mechanical holding and pulling device with hook to help pull fat off ribs. iii) Provide additional crewing. 10) SHORT RIB BONER: i) Discard ribs to side of conveyor under workstation. %% ii) Eliminate the overhead conveyor. iii) Provide a small mechanical assist with hook or jaws to replace the hand held hook. 11) HIDE TANK PULLER: i) Design a pushing and pulling device such as a hydraulic pull to eliminate the high pulling forces. ii) Provide conveyor hooks that are closer to the water height. iii) Aerating the water beneath the hides at the hooking point to float them and assist in finding the appropriate corner to hook. b) Administrative controls shall be implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of employee exposure to ergonomic stressors. These controls may include but are not limited to job rotation and reduction of repetition rate through additional staffing or the reduction of line speeds. For any administrative control schema, a detailed job analysis must be performed on each job within the schema to assure that parallel stressors, body part movements or musculoskeletal system usage are not present. A preventative maintenance program for engineering controls shall be developed and implemented. The effect of the utilization of various types of personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to assure that currently used equipment is not exacerbating or causing ergonomic stressors. c) Work practice controls shall be implemented which may include but are not limited to proper work techniques, new employee conditioning and ramp-in of injured employees or of employees returning from leave or other absences. III. MEDICAL MANAGEMENT which includes accurate recordkeeping of ergonomic illness cases. The program shall address early recognition, evaluation and referral of cumulative trauma disorder (CTDs) illness cases, and should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work, including work hardening prior to return to full duty. The medical management program is to be established under the supervision of a physician or occupational health nurse (OHN) with training in the prevention and treatment of CTD's. Systematic worksite review by the medical practitioners shall also be included in the program. Discrimination against employees for reporting or incurring a CTD shall be prohibited. The program shall include, but is not limited to, the following elements in order to prevent and/or limit the severity and exacerbation of CTDs: a) Qualified health care providers shall be trained in the early recognition, evaluation, treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention of CTDs, OSHA recordkeeping requirements, and physical assessment of employees. b) Health care providers shall perform workplace walkthroughs which will allow the identification of potential light duty jobs, and the direct observation of individual work practices in order to remain knowledgeable about operations described by employees. This shall be done when new jobs are established or as jobs change and shall be documented. Appropriate assignments to light duty jobs will be made and tracking of employees shall be performed so as to assure that an employee's medical condition is not aggravated or exacerbated. c) A written ergonomic job analysis describing the various ergonomic hazards found on each job shall be developed and made available to the health care providers. The employees in the health department shall provide input to the development of the job analysis. Periodic review and revision of the ergonomic job analysis shall be conducted, particularly when jobs change. d) A CTD surveillance shall be performed in order to identify jobs needing intervention to eliminate ergonomic hazards. Surveillance shall be both passive, by reviewing data such as illness records, and active, through administration of an employee symptom survey. Health care providers will provide input in this surveillance to identify high risk departments, production lines, or jobs. e) A CTD evaluation shall be done to identify individuals with any sign or symptoms of CTD, allowing early treatment to limit the conditions' severity. The health care provider should perform a CTD evaluation of employees assigned to jobs with known ergonomic hazards or areas found to have CTD problems by surveillance. The CTD evaluation shall include a medical and occupational history, and physical examination of the musculoskeletal and nervous systems as they relate to CTD's. The examination shall include inspection, palpation, range of motion (active, passive, and resisted), and other pertinent maneuvers of the upper extremities and back. Examples of the pertinent maneuvers for the hands and wrists include Tinel's test, Phalen's test, and Finkelstein's test. Such evaluations shall be documented. f) Evaluation and treatment of employees with complaints consistent with CTDs shall be based on protocols triggered by medical history and physical examination. Written protocols for health surveillance for the evaluation, treatment and follow-up of workers with signs and symtoms of CTDs shall be developed and used. These protocols shall be documented in writing, reviewed, and updated, by a physician, at least annually. Conservative medical treatment shall be followed for initial symptoms and signs, in order to prevent increased morbidity of CTD cases. If initial treatment of the CTD has not resulted in prompt improvement or resolution of the signs or symptoms, the employee shall be taken off the job causing the problem, or placed on restrictions by the health care provider. The restricted employee will be placed on appropriate jobs, consistent with their capability, which do not pose parallel stressors, by health care providers familiar with the job requirements. Symtomatic employees shall be followed-up to determine the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment. Employees with severe symptoms, positive physical findings, disorders, or signs resistant to treatment shall be immediately referred to a physician for further evaluation. In no event shall employees with signs or symptoms undergo conservative treatment for longer that two weeks without first being referred to a physician for evaluation. Conservative therapy and time away from the job causing the problem deserves an adequate trial before surgical intervention is contemplated. Recommendations for surgery should be referred for a second opinion to a physician other than a surgeon. Appropriate amount of time off work after surgery shall be assured. A physical evaluation of the worker after time away from work, to assess work capabilities should be performed to ensure appropriate job placement upon return to work. If the employee is being medically followed for CTDs, the medical department will review the ergonomic analysis on the job causing the problems. If a job has no ergonomic analysis available, the job will be analyzed for ergonomic stressors. g) The health care providers shall be responsible for entering the appropriate information onto the OSHA forms and thus should be appropriately and adequately trained on OSHA's recordkeeping requirements. Health care providers shall ensure the appropriate documentation of medical treatment (including self-administered treatment) and the retention of such documents. h) Evaluation of the medical management program should be performed on a periodic basis to assure effectiveness of all of the elements. A formal documented tracking and surveillance program to monitor CTD trends in the plant and to follow those employees being treated for CTDs shall be instituted. i) The foregoing recommendations for specific medical management actions are made as a result of the following problems in the current medical program observed during the inspection: %% 1) The employer failed to staff health service with appropriately trained health care providers as indicated by instances in which employees were inadequately assessed, either initially or when determining whether employees suffering from injuries and illnesses, such as CTDs, experienced significant symptoms, and/or were not provided with effective medical treatment, thus, resulting in aggravation to existing and development of further injuries and illnesses. 2) Employees were not given an appropriate type or length of restricted work activity as indicated by instances in which employees were assigned jobs that failed to meet restrictions and subsequently suffered aggravation to existing injuries and illnesses. 3) Employees were not promptly and appropriately referred to a physician for evaluation or treatment as indicated by instances in which employees, who were not promptly referred to a physician, suffered aggravation to existing injuries and illnesses, such as CTD, and development of further injuries and illnesses. 4) The employer failed to appropriately record medical findings, such as objective symptoms, whenever employees suffering injuries or illnesses visited the establishment's health service facility and were examined by health care providers or obtained medical treatment with the knowledge of the health service staff, thus causing an inaccurate history of employee medical conditions leading to possible aggravation of existing injuries and/or development of further injuries and illnesses such as CTDs. 5) Employer failed to conduct a plant-wide CTD symptom survey to monitor CTD trends in the plant. IV. TRAINING AND EDUCATION for employees. Training should address the hazards associated with the job, the risk factors which cause cumulative trauma disprders (CTDs), symptoms of exposure including signs and symptoms of cumulative trauma disorders, and how to prevent the occurrence of CTDs including the use of engineering and administrative controls and their maintenance. Retraining should be performed at least annually and as operations change. Supervisors should receive additional training sufficient to assure competency in the oversight of the program and control measures within their areas of responsibility. Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training, should be developed and implemented. ABATEMENT OF THE CITATION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: STEP 1 Implementation of an effective ergonomic program for worksite analysis, engineering controls, and training and education, as detailed in sections I, II, and IV, above. STEP 2 Submit to the Area Director a written plan of abatement which identifies and details a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice, and engineering controls as detailed in section II, above. All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by an ergonomist who is qualified in the evaluation of workplace conditions which cause ergonomic stressors. One-hundred twenty (120) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. STEP 3 Implementation of administrative, work practice, and engineering controls shall be completed. STEP 4 Development of an effective medical management program which contains the elements detailed in section III, above. STEP 5 Submit to the Area Director a written plan of abatement which
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1993
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $2000.00
- — Z (O) $3000.00
1904.4
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1993
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O) $7000.00
1910.95 D01 II
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1993
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $400 Reduced
8111
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $400.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1910.1200 E01 II
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1993
- Abate by
- May 17, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1200 E02 II
- Issued
- Apr 19, 1993
- Abate by
- May 17, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Monfort, INC.
View Monfort, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109320937.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.