JIM THORPE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: HOBMAN CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HOBMAN CORPORATION in 268 WEST BROADWAY, JIM THORPE, PA 18229 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109364646.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOBMAN CORPORATION
- Site address
- 268 WEST BROADWAY
- City
- JIM THORPE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18229
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3612
- Employees
- 28
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 1, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $720 · Current $360 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform tasks involving repetitive motions resulting in stresses that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: A) Employees wiring switches, assembling transformers and assembling circuit boards in the main area were exposed to a hazard which was causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not implement an effective control stategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. Workmen's Compensation Form and employee questionnaires documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries, July 20, 1990. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ERGONOMICS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING FOUR ELEMENTS: 1) Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing cumulative trauma disorders in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged. 2) Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of CTDs. The program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of ctd cases, and should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. 3) Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing CTDs, symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence of CTD. A supervisor's training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of the signs of CTDs and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. 4) Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work practice, and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment where relavent. A) Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribution to ergonomic stresses. B) Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors. Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include: I) Employee rotation to the various jobs; II) Evaluate employer work techniques and eliminate or change motions that put increased stress on the employees' hands, wrists, elbows and shoulders. C) Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change of work methods. the goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable to this workplace include: I) Redesign the handles of the needle-nose pliers and wire cutters to reduce wrist deviation. II) Redesign work stations to move work to a lower level to eliminate awkward elbow and arm positions, angle work so that access is easier to the various wire attachment points. III) Provide foot rests for employees whose feet cannot rest flat on the floor. IV) Locate the stack of transformers at the start of the assembly line to an easily accessible area to eliminate the need to reach up and back to get a part. V) Pad all workbenches. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE STEP 1- Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3, above. STEP 2- Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in Items 4(a) - 4(c). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. STEP 3- Implementation of administrative, work practice and engineering controls, as described in Items 4(a) - 4(c), above.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $360.00
- — Z (S) $720.00
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $135.00
- — Z (S) $270.00
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $135.00
- — Z (S) $270.00
1903.2 A01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $90 · Current $45 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $45.00
- — Z (O) $90.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Oct 1, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $90 · Current $45 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $45.00
- — Z (O) $90.00
1910.1025 D05
- Issued
- Oct 1, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1990
1592
1910.1025 L01 I
- Issued
- Oct 1, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 1990
1592
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1990
More inspections at Hobman Corporation
View Hobman Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109364646.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.