Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HOBMAN CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HOBMAN CORPORATION in 268 WEST BROADWAY, JIM THORPE, PA 18229 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109364646.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hobman Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hobman Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HOBMAN CORPORATION
Site address
268 WEST BROADWAY
City
JIM THORPE
State
PA
ZIP
18229
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3612
Employees
28
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 08 10 instances 17 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 1990
Abate by
Dec 30, 1990
Penalty
Initial $720 · Current $360 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to
perform tasks involving repetitive motions resulting in stresses that
had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumulative trauma
disorders:
A) Employees wiring switches, assembling transformers and assembling
circuit boards in the main area were exposed to a hazard which was
causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer
did not implement an effective control stategy to reduce or eliminate
such disorders. Workmen's Compensation Form and employee
questionnaires documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries,
July 20, 1990.
AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO
CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ERGONOMICS MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING FOUR ELEMENTS:
1) Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing cumulative
trauma disorders in the workplace. This analysis should include
development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee
questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted
at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering
controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be
encouraged.
2) Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of CTDs.
The program should address early recognition, evaluation, and
referral of ctd cases, and should include conservative treatment
and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the
medical team should also be included in the program.
3) Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to
evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be
done annually, or as operations change. Training should address
hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing CTDs,
symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence of CTD. A
supervisor's training program should also be implemented to allow
recognition of the signs of CTDs and to reinforce the employer's
ergonomic program.
4) Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work
practice, and administrative controls, and personal protective
equipment where relavent.
A) Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration,
frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These
controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and
preventative maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective
equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribution to
ergonomic stresses.
B) Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work
techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and
modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors.
Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include:
I) Employee rotation to the various jobs;
II) Evaluate employer work techniques and eliminate or change motions
that put increased stress on the employees' hands, wrists, elbows
and shoulders.
C) Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may
include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change
of work methods. the goal of this program should be to make the job
fit the person.
Examples of engineering controls applicable to this workplace include:
I) Redesign the handles of the needle-nose pliers and wire cutters
to reduce wrist deviation.
II) Redesign work stations to move work to a lower level to eliminate
awkward elbow and arm positions, angle work so that access is
easier to the various wire attachment points.
III) Provide foot rests for employees whose feet cannot rest flat on
the floor.
IV) Locate the stack of transformers at the start of the assembly line
to an easily accessible area to eliminate the need to reach up and
back to get a part.
V) Pad all workbenches.
ABATEMENT SCHEDULE
STEP 1-
Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical
management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3, above.
STEP 2-
Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement
outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work
practice and engineering controls as detailed in Items 4(a) - 4(c).
ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR
USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS
WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS
REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD.
STEP 3-
Implementation of administrative, work practice and engineering
controls, as described in Items 4(a) - 4(c), above.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $360.00
  • — Z (S) $720.00

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 1990
Abate by
Oct 16, 1990
Penalty
Initial $270 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $135.00
  • — Z (S) $270.00

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 1990
Abate by
Oct 16, 1990
Penalty
Initial $270 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $135.00
  • — Z (S) $270.00

1903.2 A01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 1990
Abate by
Oct 4, 1990
Penalty
Initial $90 · Current $45 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $45.00
  • — Z (O) $90.00

1904.2 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 1990
Abate by
Oct 16, 1990
Penalty
Initial $90 · Current $45 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $45.00
  • — Z (O) $90.00

1910.1025 D05

Other-than-serious Gravity 03 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 1990
Abate by
Oct 16, 1990

Hazardous substances 1592

1910.1025 L01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 03 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 1990
Abate by
Oct 31, 1990

Hazardous substances 1592

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 1990
Abate by
Oct 16, 1990

View Hobman Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109364646.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.