Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SUPERMARKET SERVICES CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUPERMARKET SERVICES CORPORATION in KEYSTONE INDUSTRIAL PARK, P.O. BOX 180, DUNMORE, PA 18512 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109365627.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Supermarket Services Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Supermarket Services Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
KEYSTONE INDUSTRIAL PARK, P.O. BOX 180
City
DUNMORE
State
PA
ZIP
18512
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
5087
Employees
614
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 08 1 instance 614 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Feb 8, 1992
Penalty
Initial $720 · Current $432 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to
perform lifting tasks resulting in stresses that had caused, were
causing, or were likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries:
A) Super Market Services, Inc., employees selecting and stocking
non perishable items, December 7, 1990. The evaluation of this
manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to a
hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries.
The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to
reduce or eliminate such injuries. the injury and illness records
for 1988 and 1989 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management
program consisting of the following four elements:
1) Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing manual lifting
hazards in the workplace. This analysis should include development
and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire.
Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at leastannually
to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee
participation in the ergonomic program should be encourage through
a mechanism such as a safety committee.
2) Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of manual
lifting injuries. The program should address recognition,
evaluation, treatment and referral of lifting cases. Systematic
worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the
program.
3) Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to
evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be
done annually, or as operations change. Training should address
hazards associated with the job, the risks of manual handling, and
how to prevent lifting injuries. A supervisor's training program
should also be implemented to allow recognition of manual lifting
hazards, and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program.
4) Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work
practices and administrative controls:
a) Administrative controls are included which reduce the duration,
frequency, and severity of exposure to manual lifting hazards.
These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repititions,
multiple person lifts, and preventative maintenanceof related
equipment.
b) Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work
techniques, new employee conditioning, proper placement of loads,
and reduction of weight lifted.
Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include:
I) Set a limit on weight of individual lifts to be lifted by one
employee;
II) Splitting of heavy item cases prior to transfer from selecting
slots to flow through racks;
III) Limited weight of goods slotted in second tier;
IV) Limited height of palletized goods for second tier selection;
V) Rotate pallets when front items have been selected from each
slot.
c) Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist andmay
include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and use of
mechanical lifting aids. The goal of this program should be to make
the job fit the person.
Examples of engineering controls applicable in this workplace include:
I) Place heavy items on floor so pallets can be accessed from
all sides;
II) Use scissor jacks for heaviest items to be selected.
STEP 1-
Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical
management, and training and education, as detailed in Items 1-3, above.
STEP 2-
Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement
outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative,
work practice and engineering controls as detailed in Items 4(a)-4(c).
ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR
USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS
WHICH CAUSE MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS
REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD.
STEP 3-
Implementation of administrative, work practice and engineering controls
as described in Items 4(a)-4(c), above.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $432.00
  • — Z (S) $720.00

1910.36 B04

Serious Gravity 09 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Mar 30, 1991
Penalty
Initial $810 · Current $486 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $486.00
  • — Z (S) $810.00

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 07 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Mar 30, 1991
Penalty
Initial $630 · Current $378 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $378.00
  • — Z (S) $630.00

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 307 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Mar 30, 1991
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $270 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $270.00
  • — Z (S) $450.00

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Mar 30, 1991
Penalty
Initial $270 · Current $162 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $162.00
  • — Z (S) $270.00

1910.37 Q01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Mar 30, 1991

1910.1200 E04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 614 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Apr 14, 1991
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.1200 F05 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 614 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Apr 14, 1991
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.1200 G01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 614 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Apr 14, 1991
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 614 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1991
Abate by
Apr 14, 1991

View Supermarket Services Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109365627.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.