WILKES-BARRE, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: TAMMS INDUSTRIES CO.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TAMMS INDUSTRIES CO. in 730 CASEY AVENUE, WILKES-BARRE, PA 18702 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109366161.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TAMMS INDUSTRIES CO.
- Site address
- 730 CASEY AVENUE
- City
- WILKES-BARRE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18702
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2891
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
16 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $630 · Current $330 Reduced
8301
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform lifting tasks resulting in stresses that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries: A) Powder Plant, manual filling of the blenders, the evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such injuries. The injury and illness records for 1988, 1989 and 1990 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries. b) Powder Plant, packing and palletizing of blended products, the evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such injuries. The injury and illness records for 1988, 1989 and 1990 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements: 1) Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing manual lifting hazards in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged through a mechanism such as a safety committee. 2) Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of manual lifting injuries. The program should address recognition, evaluation, treatment and referral of lifting cases. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. 3) Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risk of manual material handling and how to prevent lifting injuries. A supervisor's training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of manual lifting hazards and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. 4) Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work practices and adminstrative controls: a) Administrative controls and implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to manual lifting hazards. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, multiple person lifts, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. b) Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, proper placement of loads, and reduction of weight lifted. Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include: I) Reduce the weight of the bags being packed (Instance B); II) Change the lift from a one person lift to a multiple person lift (Instance A and B); and III) Train employees and supervisors to recognize and eliminate poor lifting techniques that put stress on the back and arms such as twisting and pulling (Instances A and B). c) Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and use of mechanical lifting aids. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable in this workplace include: I) Mechanical lifting aids may be used to transfer the bags of material to the blender and also to transfer the bags from the packer to the pallet (Instances A and B); II) Redesign the work station so that awkward positions can be avoided such as load location (Instances A and B); and III) Lift tables can be used to decrease the vertical distance traveled (Instances A and B). ABATEMENT SCHEDULE STEP 1- Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in Items 1-3, above. STEP 2- Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in Items 4(a)-4(c). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASUSRES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. STEP 3- Implementation of administrative, work pratice and engineering controls as described in Items 4(a)-4(c), above.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $330.00
- · Z (S) $630.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 20, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $540 · Current $225 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to mechanical and/or engulfment hazards while working in a confined space: A) Employees cleaning out the blenders were exposed to mechanical and/or engulfment hazards in that a permit system and a confined space entry program were not implemented, January 29, 1991. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is the establishment of a confined space entry program consisting of at least the following: 1) Implementation of confined space entry permit procedures which lists the precautions to be taken. The following "checklist" or precautions should be included on the entry permit: hazard(s) identified; testing and emergency procedures established; electrical equipment de-energized and locked-out; contaminants diluted by purging or ventilation; lifelines and safety belts utilized, and rescue equipment in place and tested. 2) Conduct atmosphere monitoring and testing prior to entry and during the time period that work is being performed in the confined space. Testing shall be for oxygen content and toxic substance concentrations. 3) Attach a safety belt and lifeline to the employee entering the confined space. 4) Provide a trained standby employee outside of the blenders to maintain communication with the confined space workers, unobstructed lifelines, and procedures for obtaining immediate help in the event of an emergency. Rescuers should be instructed and drilled in rescue procedures. Rescuers should be informed not to enter the confined area unless others are standing by in the event that additional help is required. the rescuer should be equipped with proper personal protective equipment including a lifeline and safety belt. 5) Instruct employees as to the nature of the hazards involved and the necessary precautions to be taken in regard to entry into the blenders. Employees should be trained with emphassis on the hazards associated with their work, the proper entry procedures to be followed and the required personal protective equipment needed when entry is made. Rescuers should be trained in artificial respiration techniques and basic first-aid procedures. 6) Provide sufficient exhaust ventilation to keep the concentration of toxic substances in the blenders to within permissable exposure limits to ensure that ventilation exhaust ducts discharge clear of working areas. 7) Provide readily available emergency standby equipmet consisting of a safety line and/or harness of sufficient length and where the internal atmosphere is oxygne deficient or contains toxic gases, a self-contained breathing apparatus or a supplied-air respirator should be utliized by the employee entering the confined space and one available for rescue. 8) All entrances to confined spaces should be posted: "Danger, confined space, entry by permit only".
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $540.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $140 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $140.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.24 F
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 22, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $140 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $140.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 1991
1910.24 I
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 22, 1991
1910.37 I
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 22, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $140 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $140.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 7, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.134 E05
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 7, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $140 Reduced
9135
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $140.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.134 E05 I
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 7, 1991
9135
1910.1000 C
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 1991
9135
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $140 Reduced
9135
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $140.00
- · I (S) $140.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 22, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $140 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $140.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.1200 F01 I
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $250.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.1200 F01 II
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 7, 1991
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Apr 22, 1991
- Abate by
- May 22, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $90
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O) $90.00
More inspections at Tamms Industries CO.
View Tamms Industries CO.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 109366161.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.