KRESGEVILLE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: KRESGEVILLE MANUFACTURING - SCOTTY'S FASHIONS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KRESGEVILLE MANUFACTURING - SCOTTY'S FASHIONS in ROUTE 209, KRESGEVILLE, PA 18333 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109368340.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KRESGEVILLE MANUFACTURING - SCOTTY'S FASHIONS
- Site address
- ROUTE 209
- City
- KRESGEVILLE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18333
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2341
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1991
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $1,300 Reduced
8302
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to repetitive motion disorders: (a) Trimming Department - employees trim loose threads from the waistband and hems of slacks using nippers. The evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1989, 1990 and 1991 documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. (b) Sewing Department - employees operate sewing machines to pin seams and attach pockets on ladies' slacks. The evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1989, 1990 and 1991 documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements. (1) Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing cumulative trauma disorders in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged. (2) Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of CTDs. The program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of CTD cases, and should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. (3) Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing CTDs, symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence of CTD. A supervisor's training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of the signs of CTDs and and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. (4) Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work practices and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment where relevant. (a) Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribution to ergonomic stress. (b) Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors. Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include: (i) Assure the understanding by managers, supervisors and workers of procedures for safe and proper work. (ii) Provide demonstations of proper work techniques to employees. (iii) Provide conditioning or break-in periods for new, reassigned, or returning employees. (iv) Monitor periodically the effectiveness of work practice techniques. (v) Modify or adjust work practices to coincide with the dynamics of the operation or process. (vi) For the trimmers, decrease the amount of scissor cuts taken to reduce the number of repetitions and yet produce an acceptable product. (c) Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change or work methods. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable in this workplace include: Trimmers (i) Replace the nippers with an ergonomically designed tool. (ii) Utilize adjustable hanging racks so the trimmers can adjust the work to a comfortable height to reduce awkward arm positions. (iii) Make tool handles longer to decrease tissue compression stress. (iv) Provide prop stools or standing stools to reduce employee fatigue. (v) Provide anti-fatigue mats to stand on. Sewers (i) Redesign the work station (work table and chair) to make it fully adjustable for each employee. (ii) Pad the edge of the work table to decrease the pressure on the forearms. (iii) Replace the scissors with an ergonimically designed tool. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE Step 1 - Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3, above. Step 2 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in items 4(a) - 4(c). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. Step 3 - Implementation of administrative, work practice and engineering controls as described in items 4(a) - 4(c), above.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $850 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850.00
- — Z (S) $1350.00
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $850 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850.00
- — Z (S) $1350.00
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1991
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1991
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1991
1910.20 G01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1991
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109368340.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.