DUNMORE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: SPECIALTY DEFENSE SYSTEMS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SPECIALTY DEFENSE SYSTEMS in 530 SHERWOOD AVENUE, DUNMORE, PA 18512 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109368365.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SPECIALTY DEFENSE SYSTEMS
- Site address
- 530 SHERWOOD AVENUE
- City
- DUNMORE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3089
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $1,800 Reduced
8302
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform tasks involving repetitive motions resulting in stresses that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: (a) Rubber Edge Department - employees apply rubber strips to the edge of the helmets. The evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1989 and 1991 documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. (b) Panel Machine Operators - employees "build" layers of material into panels for use in the Preform Department. The evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1989 and 1991 documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. (c) Preform Department - employees assemble panels of material on machinery which preforms the helmet. The evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1989 and 1991 documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements. (1) Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing cumulative trauma disorders in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged. (2) Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of CTDs. The program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of CTD cases, and should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. (3) Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing CTDs, symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence of CTD. A supervisor's training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of the signs of CTDs and and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. (4) Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work practices and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment where relevant. (a) Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribution to ergonomic stress. (b) Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors. Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include: (i) Provide training sessions, including demonstrations of proper work techniques to employees, including managers, supervisors and exposed workers. (ii) Periodically monitor the effectiveness of work practice techniques. (iii) Provide conditioning and/or break-in periods for new or reassigned employees. (iv) Instruct employees to only use the force required (i.e. not excessive force) to apply rubber edging to helmets. (v) Instruct employees not to put force on the palms of their hands when rolling rubber edging and when flipping switches on preform machines. (c) Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change or work methods. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable in this workplace include: Rubber Edge Department: (i) Replace the wooden roller with an ergonimacally designed tool. (ii) Redesign the work station to a comfortable height to reduce awkward arm positions. (iii) Replace the razor knife with an ergonomically designed tool. Panel Machine Operators: (i) Redesign the trays so that they are easily pulled in and out. (ii) Redesign the work station so that employees are not reaching so far for materials. Preform Department: (i) Eliminate the need to open each toggle switch by having a main control to open half of the switches at a time. (ii) Redesign the work station to a comfortable height to eliminate awkward arm positions. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE Step 1 - Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3, above. Step 2 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in items 4(a) - 4(c). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. Step 3 - Implementation of administrative, work practice and engineering controls as described in items 4(a) - 4(c), above.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1800.00
- — Z (S) $2625.00
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $1,800 Reduced
8110
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1800.00
- — Z (S) $2625.00
1910.95 I02 I
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1991
8110
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $1,600 Reduced
8110
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1600.00
- — Z (S) $2625.00
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1991
8110
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1991
8110
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1991
8110
1910.95 L01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1991
8110
1910.106 E06 II
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $700 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700.00
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.1048 N02 I
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $700 Reduced
1290
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700.00
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Sep 27, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 1991
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Specialty Defense Systems
View Specialty Defense Systems's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109368365.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.