NAKNEK, AK —
OSHA Inspection: HIGHLAND LIGHT, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of HIGHLAND LIGHT, INC. in F/T HIGHLAND LIGHT-NAKNEK Y, NAKNEK, AK 99633 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109431809.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HIGHLAND LIGHT, INC.
- Site address
- F/T HIGHLAND LIGHT-NAKNEK Y
- City
- NAKNEK
- State
- AK
- ZIP
- 99633
- Mailing
- 123 N. 36TH ST., SUITE 230, SEATTLE, WA 98107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2092
- Employees
- 98
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Maritime health.
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 15, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a recognized hazard of electrical shock or burns: (a)F/T Highland Light: Employees working in the maintenance shop had occasion to use or be near a Jet drill press (serial number 090040) with a flexible electric light bulb attachment. The light socket was broken, exposing live 110 volt electrical wires. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to disconnect the light bulb attachment. (b)F/T Highland Light: Employees had occasion to work near a General Electric circuit breaker panel box (EM-010347) with exposed bus bars. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns in the event of accidental contact while flipping switches at the panel box. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to replace the circuit breaker. (c)F/T Highland Light: Employees had occasion to work near an AB493 series electrical panelboard located in the forward end of the processing deck. The panelboard was not dead fronted, exposing employees to possible electrical shock or burns in the event of accidental contact with bare electrical conductors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to replace the missing dead front. (d)F/T Highland Light: Employees working on the processing deck had occasion to use or be near the starboard hatch door with an electrical extension cord running through it to a 110-volt trouble light. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns in the event the hatch door is closed on the extension cord and the insulation is abraded. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to remove the extension cord from the doorway. (e)F/T Highland Light: Employees had occasion to work near an AB493 series electrical panelboard located in the control lab. The panelboard was not dead fronted, exposing employees to possible electrical shock or burns in the event of accidental contact with bare electrical conductors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct his hazard would be to replace the missing dead front. (f)F/T Highland Light: Employees working on the process deck had occasion to work near an extension cord run from the hospital office through two hatch doors, wrapped around steel piping, and ultimately to a string of overhead lights on the processing deck. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns in the event the hatch door(s) are closed on the extension cord and the insulation is abraded. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to hard wire an electrical outlet near the processing deck. (g)F/T Highland Light: Employees working in the electrical distribution room had occasion to work near a 110 volt distribution panel that was not dead fronted to cover two openings. The upper opening measured 2-1/2 inches by 12 inches and the lower opening was 30 inches by 36 inches. Employees were exposed to possible electrical shock or burns in the event of accidental contact with bare electrical conductors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to replace the missing dead front. (h)F/T Highland Light: Employees working on the processing deck had occasion to work near energized 100 volt electrical wires. The electrical wires were adjacent to a walkway and approximately 12 inches off the floor. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns in the event of accidental contact with bare electrical conductors. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to de-energize the electrical circuit. (i)F/T Highland Light: Employees working in the galley had occasion to work near extension cords run from the galley through the freight elevator door to a power drill and radio. This condition exposed employees to possible electrical shock or burns in the event the elevator door is closed on the extension cords and the insulation is abraded. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to remove the extension cords when work in not in progress.
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Aug 15, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Aug 15, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 1995
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Aug 15, 1995
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 1995
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Aug 15, 1995
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Aug 15, 1995
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 1995
1910.134 E03
- Issued
- Aug 15, 1995
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 1995
1910.134 F02 IV
- Issued
- Aug 15, 1995
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 1995
More inspections at Highland Light, INC.
View Highland Light, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in AK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109431809.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.