Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: YUKON PRINCESS FISHERIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of YUKON PRINCESS FISHERIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP in F/V YUKON PRINCESS, DUTCH HARBOR, AK 99692 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109432260.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Yukon Princess Fisheries Limited Partnership for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Yukon Princess Fisheries Limited Partnership is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
F/V YUKON PRINCESS
City
DUTCH HARBOR
State
AK
ZIP
99692
Mailing
641 EWING ST., SEATTLE, WA 98199
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2092
Employees
28
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Maritime safety.

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1995
Abate by
Mar 20, 1995
Penalty
Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to a recognized hazard of electrical shock and burns:
(a)F/V Yukon Princess:  Employees working or walking on the starboard side
of the
vessel were exposed to the live electrical conductors that were pulled
from an
electrical duplex box strain relief and the ground wire was severed at the
break.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would
be to repair the broken strain relief and correct the ground wire.
Recent events (2)
  • · D (S) $1250.00
  • · Z (S) $1250.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1995
Abate by
Mar 20, 1995
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to a recognized hazard of electrical shock and burns:
(a)F/V Yukon Princess:  Employees working in the vessel tool/compressor
room
were exposed to live 240 volt electrical conductors on the State 510E hot
water
heater where the protective cover was not in place to prevent employee
contact
with live electrical conductors.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would
be to reinstall the cover over the controls and live conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • · D (S)
  • · Z (S)

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1995
Abate by
Apr 17, 1995
Penalty
Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to a recognized hazard of electrical shock, amputation, or
inadvertent restart of
machinery:
(a)F/V Yukon Princess:  Employees working on equipment on the vessel such
as
compressors, conveyors, electrical control, etc. were exposed and
subjected to
possible personal injury because the employer failed to provide a
lockout/tagout
energy control program to protect employees.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would
be to implement a lockout/tagout program for the vessel.
Recent events (2)
  • · D (S) $1250.00
  • · Z (S) $1250.00

1910.101 A

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1995
Abate by
Apr 17, 1995
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (2)
  • · D (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1995
Abate by
Mar 28, 1995
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (2)
  • · D (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1995
Abate by
Mar 21, 1995
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (2)
  • · D (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1918.11 A

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1995
Abate by
Apr 7, 1995
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (2)
  • · D (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1918.105 A

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 1995
Abate by
Mar 20, 1995
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (2)
  • · D (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

View Yukon Princess Fisheries Limited Partnership's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 109432260.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.