LAUDERDALE LAKES, FL —
OSHA Inspection: FLORIDA MEDICAL CENTER LTD DBA FLORIDA MEDICAL CTR
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FLORIDA MEDICAL CENTER LTD DBA FLORIDA MEDICAL CTR in 5000 WEST OAKLAND PARK BLVD., LAUDERDALE LAKES, FL 33309 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109682633.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FLORIDA MEDICAL CENTER LTD DBA FLORIDA MEDICAL CTR
- Site address
- 5000 WEST OAKLAND PARK BLVD.
- City
- LAUDERDALE LAKES
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33309
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8062
- Employees
- 1456
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1993
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $2,275 · Current $1,140 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: On or about May 27, to June 3, 1993, Nurses, Respiratory Therapists and other employees were exposed to the hazard of being infected with tuberculosis (TB) through repeated, prolonged indoor contact with patients who are infectious, or suspected of being infectious, with TB in that employees had potential exposure to the exhaled air of individuals with suspected or confirmed TB disease, and/or performed, or were exposed during performance of, high-hazard procedures (such as aerosolized medication treatment, bronchoscopy, sputum induction, endotracheal entubation, and suctioning procedures, and autopsies which have the potential to generate potentially infectious airborne respiratory secretions) performed on individuals with suspected or confirmed TB disease where; (1) A protocol for early identification and treatment of individuals with active TB was not developed and implemented. (2) Periodic employee medical evaluations and PPD tuberculin skin testing was not of appropriate frequency for workers with frequent exposure to patients with TB or who are involved with high hazard procedures. (3) Worker education and training to ensure employee knowledge of hazards of TB and compliance with appropriate controls was not developed and implemented for all exposed employees. (4) Feasible engineering control measures were not fully implemented and maintained for employee protection. Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing this hazard, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control, among others, are: (1) Develop and implement a protocol for early identification of individuals/patients with active TB. (2) Provide medical screening for workers which includes the following: (i) Periodic evaluations; provide initial and periodic employee medical evaluations which include PPD tuberculin skin testing every six (6) months for workers with frequent exposure to patients with TB or who are involved with high hazard procedures. Provide all other workers in the covered workplace testing annually. Note; workers with a documented positive TB skin test who have received documented adequate treatment for disease or preventative therapy for infection are exempt unless they develop symptoms. NOTE: Evaluations must include Mantoux skin test free of charge, conducted in accordance with standard medical practice, and at a time and place convenient to the employee. (ii) Reassessment following exposure or change of health; additionally, provide any employee experiencing an unprotected occupational exposure to a person with infectious tuberculosis disease a revaluation and repeat PPD testing in accordance with current CDC guidelines. (3) Provide case management which includes appropriate physical, laboratory, and radiographic evaluations of new converters to determine whether the employee has TB disease as soon as possible, normally within 72 hours, following detection of a PPD conversion. Provide prophylactic therapy in accordance with current CDC guidelines. (4) Provide medical removal when workers with infectious TB disease are detected by medical evaluation. Remove infectious workers from duty until there is no risk of transmission of TB. Return workers on medical removal to work when adequate treatment for TB disease is instituted, cough has resolved, and a health care professional certifies the the employee is no longer infectious. (5) Implement feasible engineering controls as follows on the basis of qualitative risk assessment and the ability of each method to provide employe protection: (i) Place individuals with suspected or confirmed TB disease in AFB (acid fast bacilli) isolation rooms. perform high-risk procedures on individuals with suspected or confirmed TB disease in designated treatment room. (ii) keep AFB isolation and treatment rooms under negative pressure to induce airflow into the room from all surrounding areas (e.g. corridors, ceiling plenums, plumbing chases, etc). NOTE: Air flow exhausted from isolation/treatment rooms must be transported through ducts and systems which are recognized as containing "biohazard air" and hwich are designed and operated to ensure maintenance of negative pressure during normal operations and during interuptions (e.g. power failures and required maintenance). (6) Provide worker education and training prior to initial assignment, and at least annually, which includes at least the following elements; (i) Nature and transmissibility of TB (ii) Risk factors for disease development! (iii) Signs, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of TB disease (iv) Institutional protocols (v) Engineering controls (vi) Workpractice controls, including personal hygiene protection (vii) Personal protective equipment (7) In laboratories, conduct all aerosol-generating manipulatins of clinical specimens of (or containing, or that may potentially contain) Mycobacterium tuberculosis in appropriate Class I, II or III biological safety cabinets (BSC). (a) Recertify BSC annually, at a minimum, and whenever the HEPA filers are replaced, the BSC is moved, or maintenance is performed on the BSC. (b) Determine appropriate biosafety levels for laboratory operations from the advisory guidelines in Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities (CDC/NIOSH). References: 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing transmission of tuberculosis in health-care settings, with special focus on HIVrelated issues. MMWR 1990; 39(NO. RR-17):1-29. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/NIH. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical facilities. 3rd ed., 1993 (HHS Pub #(NIH)040-00508-3. ABATEMENT NOTE: MULTI-STEP ABATEMENT PLAN IS AS FOLLOWS; Step 1: (a) Institutional policy shall be drafted and implemented for early identification of individuals/patients with active TB. (b) Employee medical monitoring program shall be revised to include tuberculin (PPD) skin testing of appropriate frequency. (c) Employee training shall be developed and implemented. (d) A written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering measures to control or reduce employee exposure to TB as referenced in this citation shall be submitted to the Area Director. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation. (1) Evaluation of engineering control optionsl; (2) Selection of optimum control methods; (3) Procurement, installation, and operation of selected control measures; and (4) Testing or acceptance or modification/redesign of controls. NOTE: All proposed control measures shall be approved by a competent, technically qualified person. Thirty (30) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. Step 2. Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of engineering controls and upon verification of their effectiveness.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1140.00
- — Z (S) $2275.00
1910.134 A02
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $650 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $650.00
- — Z (S) $1300.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 1993
1910.1030 F01 IIA
- Issued
- Aug 11, 1993
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $650 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $650.00
- — Z (S) $1300.00
1910.1030 F02 IV
- Issued
- Aug 11, 1993
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1030 F05
- Issued
- Aug 11, 1993
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1030 C02 IB
- Issued
- Aug 11, 1993
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 1993
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 11, 1993
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 1993
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Aug 11, 1993
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 1993
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109682633.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.