FORT LAUDERDALE, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE in 5301 SW 31ST AVENUE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109689992.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
- Site address
- 5301 SW 31ST AVENUE
- City
- FORT LAUDERDALE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33312
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8011
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 7, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing of likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: (a) On or about January 28 February 7, 1994, the Medical Examiner, Associate Medical examiners and other Pathologists, Morgue Curators, and other employees were exposed to hazards of tuberculosis (TB) infection or disease in the morgue during autopsy procedures which may aerosolize infectious particles e.g. sawing, irrigating!, and in adjacent and contiguous areas of the building not physically separated from and potentially contaminated by air recirculated from the morgue, where: (1) Periodic employee medical evaluations and PPD tuberculin skin testing were not offered and made available for all exposed employees. (2) Worker education and training was not developed and implemented for all exposed employees. (3) Feasible engineering control measures were not fully implemented and maintained for employee protection. Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing this hazard include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Provide free medical screening for workers which includes the following: (i) Preplacement exams; provide new employees in the covered workplace preplacement health assessment including history and a PPD tuberculin skin test. (ii) Administration and interpretation of skin tests; offer all employees in the covered workplace the Mantoux skin test free of charge, conducted in accordance with standard medical practice, and at a time and place convenient to the employee. (iii) Periodic evaluations; provide periodic employee medical evaluations which include PPD tuberculin skin testing every (6) months for workers with frequent exposure to individuals with TB. Provide all other workers in the covered workplace testing annually. Note; workers with a documented positive TB skin test who have received documented adequate treatment for disease or preventive therapy for infection are exempt unless they develop symptoms. (iv) Reassessment following exposure or change of health; additionally, provide any employee experiencing an unprotected occupational exposure to a person with infectious tuberculosis disease a revaluation and repeat PPD testing in accordance with current CDC guidelines. (2) Provide case management of infected employees which include the following: (i) Protocol for new converters; provide appropriate physical, laboratory and radiographic evaluation to determine whether the employee has TB disease as soon as possible, normally within 72 hours, following detection of a PPD conversion. Provide prophylactic therapy in accordance with current CDC guidelines. (ii) Medical removal of infectious employees; When workers with infectious TB disease are detected by medical evaluation, remove infectious workers from duty until there is no risk of transmission of TB. (iii) Return to work; return workers on medical removal to work when adequate treatment for TB disease is instituted, cough has resolved, and a health care professional certifies that the employee is no longer infectious. (3) Provide worker education and training prior to initial assignment, and at least annually, which includes at least the following elements; (i) Nature and transmissibility of TB (ii) Risk factors for disease development (iii) Signs, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of TB disease (iv) Institutional protocols (v) Engineering controls (vi) Workplace controls, including personal hygiene protection (vii) Personal protective equipment (4) Implement feasible engineering controls as follows on the basis of qualitative risk assessment and the ability of each method to provide employee protection: (i) Perform autopsies on individuals with suspected or confirmed TB disease in appropriately isolated autopsy rooms. (ii) Keep autopsy rooms under negative pressure to induce airflow into the rooms from all surroundings areas (e.g. corridors, ceiling plenums, plumbing chases, etc.) (iii) Ventilation control methods should include the following; (a) Direction of airflow into autopsy rooms must be monitored (demonstrated) at least monthly to assure maintenance of negative pressure. (b) Air flow exhausted from containment rooms must be transported through ducts dedicated to "biohazard air" and these ducts may communicate only with other contaminated air into adjacent areas. (c) The opening and closing of doors in containment rooms which are not equipped with an anteroom must employ a combination of controls and practices to minimize spillage of contaminated air into adjacent areas. ABATEMENT NOTE: ASHRAE recommends that autopsy rooms have ventilation that provides at least 12 totalair changes per hour. In addition these rooms should have good distribution of air flow in the room, negative pressure with respect to adjacent areas, and room air exhausted directly to the outside of the building. (iv) In laboratories, conduct all aerosolgenerating manipulations of clinical specimens of (or containing, or that may potentially contain) Mycobacterium tuberculosis in appropriate Class I, II, or III biological safety cabinets (BSC). (a) Recertify BSC annually, at a minimum, and whenever the HEPA filters are replaced, the BSC is moved, or maintenance is performed on the BSC. (b) Determine appropriate biosafety levels for laboratory operations from the advisory guidelines in Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities (CDC). References: 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing transmission of tuberculosis in healthcare settings, with special focus on HIVrelated issues. MMWR 1990; 39(No. RR17):129. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/NIH. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities. 3rd ed., May 1993 (HHS Pub.#CDC! 938395). 3. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers. 1987 ASHRAE handbook: heating, ventilating, and airconditioning systems and applications. Atlanta, Georgia: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc. 1987:23 123.12. ABATEMENT NOTE: MULTISTEP ABATEMENT PLAN IS AS FOLLOWS; Step 1: (a) Employee medical monitoring program shall be tuberculin (PPD) skin testing of appropriate frequency. (b) Employee training shall be developed and implemented. (c) A written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering measures to control or reduce employee exposure to TB as referenced in this citation shall be submitted to the Area Director. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation. (1) Evaluation of engineering control options; (2) Selection of optimum control methods; (3) Procurement, installation, and operation of selected control measures; and (4) Testing or acceptance or modification/redesign of controls. NOTE: All proposed control measures shall be approved by a competent, technically qualified person. Forty five(45) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. Step 2: Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of engineering controls and upon verification of their effectiveness.
Recent events (2)
- · R (S) $1260.00
- · Z (S) $3150.00
1910.134 A02
- Issued
- Apr 7, 1994
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,260 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · R (S) $1260.00
- · Z (S) $3150.00
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Apr 7, 1994
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,260 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · R (S) $1260.00
- · Z (S) $3150.00
1910.1030 C01 IIB
- Issued
- Apr 7, 1994
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 1994
Recent events (2)
- · R (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.1030 C01 IIC
- Issued
- Apr 7, 1994
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 1994
Recent events (2)
- · R (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Apr 7, 1994
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · R (S) $900.00
- · Z (S) $1800.00
1910.1030 D02 IX
- Issued
- Apr 7, 1994
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 1994
Recent events (2)
- · R (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.1030 E02 I
- Issued
- Apr 7, 1994
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,260 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · R (S) $1260.00
- · Z (S) $3150.00
1910.1030 G02 IIA
- Issued
- Apr 7, 1994
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,260 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · R (S) $1260.00
- · Z (S) $3150.00
1910.1030 C02 I
- Issued
- Apr 1, 1994
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 1994
Recent events (2)
- · R (S)
- · Z (S)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 109689992.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.