MIAMI, FL —
OSHA Inspection: WESTCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WESTCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC. in 2500 SW 75TH AVE., MIAMI, FL 33155 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109691360.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WESTCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC.
- Site address
- 2500 SW 75TH AVE.
- City
- MIAMI
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33155
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8069
- Employees
- 280
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
19 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,275 · Current $2,275
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: %% The employer did not furnish to employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: On or about April 26, 1994, Nurses, Respiratory Therapists, Emergency Room Techs, X-ray Technicians and other employees were expsosed to the hazard of being infected with tuberculosis (TB) in the the performance of their job duties due to the repeated, prolonged, indoor contact with patients who were infectious, or suspected of being infectious, with TB in that employees had potential exposure to the exhaled air of individuals with suspected or confirmed TB disease and/or performed, or were exposed during performance of high-hazard procedures (e.g. aerosolized medication treatment, bronchoscopy, sputum induction, endotracheal intub ation, and suctioning procedures which have the potential to generate potentially infectious airborne respiratory secretions or infectious airborne particles when performed on individuals with suspected or confirmed TB disease where; (1) A protocol for early identification of individuals with active TB was not developed and implemented. (2) Periodic employee medical evaluations and PPD tuberculin skin testing was not offered and made available to all employees exposed to TB. (3) Worker education and training to ensure employee knowledge of hazards of TB and compliance with appropriate controls was not developed and implemented for all employees exposed to TB. (4) Feasible engineering control measures were not fully implemented and maintained for employee protection from hazards of TB. Feasible and useful abatement methods for reducing this hazard include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Develop and implement a protocol for early identification of individuals with active TB. (2) Provide medical screening for workers which includes the following: (i) Periodic evaluations; provide initial and periodic employee medical evaluations which include PPD tuberculin skin testing every six (6) months for workers with frequent exposure to individuals with TB. Provide all other workers in the covered workplace testing annually. NOTE: Workers with a documented positive TB skin test who have received documented adequate treatment for disease or preventative therapy for infection are exempt unless they develop symptoms.NOTE: Evaluations must include Mantoux skin test free of charge, conducted in accordance with standard medical practice, and at a time and place convenient to the employee. (ii) Reassessment following exposure or change of health; additionally, provide any employee experiencing an unprotected occupational exposure to a person with infectious tuberculosis disease a revaluation and repeat PPD testing in accordance with current CDC guidelines. (3) Provide case management which includes appropriate physical, laboratory, and radiographic evaluations of new converters to determine whether the employee has TB disease as soon as possible, normally within 72 hours, following detection of a PPD conversion. Provide prophylactic therapy in accordance with current CDC guidelines. (4) Provide medical removal when workers with infectious TB diseases are detected by medical evaluation. Remove infectious workers from duty until there is no risk of transmission of TB. Return workers on medical removal to work when adequate treatment for TB disease is instituted cough has resolved, and a health care professional certifies that the employee is no longer infectious. (5) Implement feasible engineering controls as follows on the basis of qualitative risk assessment and the ability of each method to provide employee protection: (i) Place individuals with suspected or confirmed TB disease in AFB (acid fact bacilli) isolation/ holding/ interview rooms and perform "high risk" procedures such as sputum inductions, bronchoscopy, aerosol generating procedures, and other treatments provided. (ii) Keep AFB isolation rooms/procedures rooms under negative pressure to induce airflow into the room from all surrounding areas (e.g. adjoining hallways, offices, processing areas. ceiling plenums, plumbing chases, etc.) (iii) Monitor (demonstrate) direction of airflow frequently to assure maintenance of negative pressure, frequently, and after adjustment or maintenance is performed on the systems. (iv) Employ a combination of controls and workpractices to minimize spillage of contaminated air from AFB containment rooms/isolation rooms/procedures rooms when opening and closing doors and to assure door closure. NOTE: Air flow exhausted from isolation rooms must be transported through ducts and systems which are recognized as containing "biohazard air" and which are designed and operated to ensure maintenance of negative pressure during normal operations and during interruptions (e.g. power failures and required maintenance). (6) Provide worker education and training prior to initial assignment and at least annually, which includes at least the following elements; (i) Nature and transmissibility of TB (ii) Risk factors for disease development (iii) Signs, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of TB disease (iv) Institutional protocols (v) Engineering controls (vi) Workpractice controls, including personal hygiene protection (vii) Personal protective equipment References: 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing transmission of tuberculosis in health-care settings, with special focus on HIV related issues. MMWR 1990; 39(No. RR-17):1-29. 2. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers. 1987 ASHRAE handbook: heating ventilating, and air-conditioning systems and applications. Atlanta, Georgia: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc. 1987:23 1-23.12. ABATEMENT NOTE: MULTI-STEP ABATEMENT PLAN IS AS FOLLOWS; Step 1:(a) Institutional policy shall be developed and implemented for early identification of individuals/patients with active TB. (b) Employee medical monitoring program shall be established and include/ revised to include/ tuberculin (PPD) skin testing of appropriate frequency. (c) Employee training shall be developed and implemented. (d) A written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for theimplementation of engineering measures to control or reduce employee exposure to TB as referenced in this citation shall be submitted to the Area Director. This plan shall include, at minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation. (1) Evaluation of engineering control options; (2) Selection of optimum control methods; (3) Procurement, installation, and operation of selected control measures; and (4) Testing or acceptance or modification/redesign of controls. Abatement Plan Due (Step 1) 30 days Step 2:Abatement Shall have been completed by the implementation of engineering controls and upon verification of their effectiveness. NOTE: All proposed control measures shall be approved by a competent, technically qualified person. Thirty (30) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. Final Abatement Due (Step 2) 90 days
1910.134 B01
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $975 · Current $975
1910.134 B10
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 1994
1910.145 F04
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $975 · Current $975
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $1,300
1910.1030 C01 IIC
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $1,300
1910.1030 D02 VIIA
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
1910.1030 D04 IIA
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $2,275 · Current $2,275
1910.1030 D04 IIA
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 1994
1910.1030 F02 IV
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $975 · Current $975
1910.1030 F03 II
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $975 · Current $975
1910.1030 F03 IV
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,525 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — A (S) $3525.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.1030 F05
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $975 · Current $975
1910.1030 H01 IIB
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $1,300
1910.1048 D02 I
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,300 · Current $1,300
1910.1048 I03
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 21, 1994
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $650 · Current $650
1910.1200 G10
- Issued
- Aug 25, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 1994
1910.134 B10
- Issued
- Aug 24, 1994
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 1994
More inspections at Westchester General Hospital, INC.
View Westchester General Hospital, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109691360.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.